FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.13.7

नासच्छास्त्रेषु सज्जेत नोपजीवेत जीविकाम् । वादवादांस्त्यजेत्तर्कान्पक्षं कंच न संश्रयेत् ॥ ७ ॥
nāsac-chāstreṣu sajjeta
[naasach-chaastreshu sajjeta]
nopajīveta jīvikām
[nopajeeveta jeevikaam]
vāda-vādāṁs tyajet tarkān
[vaada-vaadaams tyajet tarkaan]
pakṣaṁ kaṁca na saṁśrayet
[paksham kamcha na samshrayet]
na — not asat-śāstreṣu — literature like newspapers, novels, dramas and fiction sajjeta — one should be attached or should indulge in reading na — nor upajīveta — one should try to live jīvikām — upon some professional literary career vāda-vādān — unnecessary arguments on different aspects of philosophy tyajet — one should give up tarkān — arguments and counterarguments pakṣam — faction kaṁca — any na — not saṁśrayet — should take shelter of.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nāsac-chāstreṣu sajjeta
na
not
asat-śāstreṣu
literature like newspapers, novels, dramas and fiction
sajjeta
one should be attached or should indulge in reading
nopajīveta jīvikām
vāda-vādāṁs tyajet tarkān
pakṣaṁ kaṁca na saṁśrayet
na
nor
upajīveta
one should try to live
jīvikām
upon some professional literary career
vāda-vādān
unnecessary arguments on different aspects of philosophy
tyajet
one should give up
tarkān
arguments and counterarguments
pakṣam
faction
kaṁca
any
na
not
saṁśrayet
should take shelter of.
Literature that is a useless waste of time — in other words, literature without spiritual benefit — should be rejected. One should not become a professional teacher as a means of earning one’s livelihood, nor should one indulge in arguments and counterarguments. Nor should one take shelter of any cause or faction.

A person desiring to advance in spiritual understanding should be extremely careful to avoid reading ordinary literature. The world is full of ordinary literature that creates unnecessary agitation in the mind. Such literature, including newspapers, dramas, novels and magazines, is factually not meant for advancement in spiritual knowledge. Indeed, it has been described as a place of enjoyment for crows ( tad vāyasaṁ tīrtham ). Anyone advancing in spiritual knowledge must reject such literature. Furthermore, one should not concern oneself with the conclusions of various logicians or philosophers. Of course, those who preach sometimes need to argue with the contentions of opponents, but as much as possible one should avoid an argumentative attitude. In this connection, Śrīla Madhvācārya says:

aprayojana-pakṣaṁ na saṁśrayet

nāprayojana-pakṣī syān na vṛthā śiṣya-bandha-kṛt na codāsīnaḥ śāstrāṇi na viruddhāni cābhyaset

na vyākhyayopajīveta na niṣiddhān samācaret evam-bhūto yatir yāti tad-eka-śaraṇo harim

“There is no need to take shelter of unnecessary literature or concern oneself with many so-called philosophers and thinkers who are useless for spiritual advancement. Nor should one accept a disciple for the sake of fashion or popularity. One should be callous to these so-called śāstras, neither opposing nor favoring them, and one should not earn one’s livelihood by taking money for explaining śāstra. A sannyāsī must always be neutral and seek the means to advance in spiritual life, taking full shelter under the lotus feet of the Lord.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
One should not be attached to material literature or maintain oneself by an occupation. One should give up controversial arguments and not take either side in an argument. Furthermore, one should not take either side in an argument.
Reject literature without spiritual benefit, do not teach for livelihood, avoid argument, and do not take sides in disputes. Mental nutrition matters as much as physical. What you read writes you.
Reflection Questions
  • What in your reading diet would Nārada classify as 'useless waste of time'?
  • What single substitution this week would feed you more spiritually?
📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 13