Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.9.3
स एव हि ददौ भागं परोक्षमसुरान् प्रति ।
यजमानोऽवहद् भागं मातृस्नेहवशानुग: ॥ ३ ॥
sa eva hi dadau bhāgaṁ
[sa eva hi dadau bhaagam]
parokṣam asurān prati
[paroksham asuraan prati]
yajamāno ’vahad bhāgaṁ
[yajamaano ’vahad bhaagam]
mātṛ-sneha-vaśānugaḥ
[maatri-sneha-vashaanugah]
Word-for-word
saḥ
—
he (Viśvarūpa)
eva
—
indeed
hi
—
certainly
dadau
—
offered
bhāgam
—
share
parokṣam
—
without the knowledge of the demigods
asurān
—
the demons
prati
—
unto
yajamānaḥ
—
performing sacrifice
avahat
—
offered
bhāgam
—
share
mātṛ-sneha
—
by affection for his mother
vaśa-anugaḥ
—
being compelled.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa eva hi dadau bhāgaṁ
saḥ
he (Viśvarūpa)
eva
indeed
hi
certainly
dadau
offered
bhāgam
share
parokṣam asurān prati
parokṣam
without the knowledge of the demigods
asurān
the demons
prati
unto
yajamāno ’vahad bhāgaṁ
yajamānaḥ
performing sacrifice
mātṛ-sneha-vaśānugaḥ
avahat
offered
bhāgam
share
mātṛ-sneha
by affection for his mother
vaśa-anugaḥ
being compelled.
Although offering clarified butter in the sacrificial fire in the name of the demigods, without the knowledge of the demigods he also offered oblations to the demons because they were his relatives through his mother.
Purport
Because of Viśvarūpa’s affection for the families of both the demigods and the demons, he appeased the Supreme Lord on behalf of both dynasties. When he offered oblations in the fire on behalf of the asuras, he did so secretly, without the knowledge of the demigods.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Translation
Offering a share to the demons without the knowledge of the devatās, he had the demons obtain a share, out of affection for his mother.
Parokṣam means that he offered in a low voice some oblations to the demons so that the devatās did not notice. Offering that share, he had them attain it (avahat). His grandmother was a demon.
Personal Guidance
Privately, Viśvarūpa also offered oblations to the demons (his mother's relatives) without the demigods knowing. Loyalty by blood can quietly subvert loyalty by office.
Reflection Questions
- Where am I quietly serving two camps that should not both be served?
- Which blood loyalty would I have to renounce to be wholly faithful to my current duty?
My note
Source: vedabase.io