Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.7.21
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
Lord Brahmā recognized the brahminical qualifications of Bṛhaspati, who was the spiritual master of the demigods because of his awareness of the Supreme Brahman. Bṛhaspati was very much in control of his senses and mind, and therefore he was a most qualified brāhmaṇa. Lord Brahmā chastised the demigods for not properly respecting this brāhmaṇa, who was their guru. Lord Brahmā wanted to impress upon the demigods that one’s guru should not be disrespected under any circumstances. When Bṛhaspati entered the assembly of the demigods, they and their king, Indra, took him for granted. Since he came every day, they thought, they did not need to show him special respect. As it is said, familiarity breeds contempt. Being very much displeased, Bṛhaspati immediately left Indra’s palace. Thus all the demigods, headed by Indra, became offenders at the lotus feet of Bṛhaspati, and Lord Brahmā, being aware of this, condemned their neglect. In a song we sing every day, Narottama dāsa Ṭhākura says, cakṣu-dāna dila yei, janme janme prabhu sei: the guru gives spiritual insight to the disciple, and therefore the guru should be considered his master, life after life. Under no circumstances should the guru be disrespected, but the demigods, being puffed up by their material possessions, were disrespectful to their guru. Therefore Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (11.17.27) advises, ācāryaṁ māṁ vijānīyān nāvamanyeta karhicit/ na martya-buddhyāsūyeta: the ācārya should always be offered respectful obeisances; one should never envy the ācārya, considering him an ordinary human being.
- NRM SB 06-07-21-40
- Balaram Shakti Pr SB 06-07-21-26 - Thane
- BJP SB 06-07-21-40 - 2001-03-28
- Madhavananda Pr SB 06-07-21 - Never Disrespect Guru - 2012-02-24 Punjabi Bagh
- Sundar Nimai Pr SB 06-07-21-40 Telugu - Indra offends his Spiritual Master Brihaspati Part-02 - 2022-12-16 ISKCON Habibpur
- Bhanu Sw SB 06-07-21-22 - 2012-06-05
- Whose accurate naming of my failure am I avoiding?
- Can I sit with a harsh truth without making the messenger soften it?
My note
Source: vedabase.io