FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.1.20

अत्र चोदाहरन्तीममितिहासं पुरातनम् । दूतानां विष्णुयमयो: संवादस्तं निबोध मे ॥ २० ॥
atra codāharantīmam
[atra chodaaharanteemam]
itihāsaṁ purātanam
[itihaasam puraatanam]
dūtānāṁ viṣṇu-yamayoḥ
[dootaanaam vishnu-yamayoh]
saṁvādas taṁ nibodha me
[samvaadas tam nibodha me]
atra — in this connection ca — also udāharanti — they give as an example imam — this itihāsam — the history (of Ajāmila) purātanam — which is very old dūtānām — of the order carriers viṣṇu — of Lord Viṣṇu yamayoḥ — and of Yamarāja saṁvādaḥ — the discussion tam — that nibodha — try to understand me — from me.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
atra codāharantīmam
atra
in this connection
ca
also
udāharanti
they give as an example
imam
this
itihāsaṁ purātanam
itihāsam
the history (of Ajāmila)
purātanam
which is very old
dūtānāṁ viṣṇu-yamayoḥ
dūtānām
of the order carriers
viṣṇu
of Lord Viṣṇu
yamayoḥ
and of Yamarāja
saṁvādas taṁ nibodha me
saṁvādaḥ
the discussion
tam
that
nibodha
try to understand
me
from me.
In this regard, learned scholars and saintly persons describe a very old historical incident involving a discussion between the order carriers of Lord Viṣṇu and those of Yamarāja. Please hear of this from me.

The Purāṇas, or old histories, are sometimes neglected by unintelligent men who consider their descriptions mythological. Actually, the descriptions of the Purāṇas, or the old histories of the universe, are factual, although not chronological. The Purāṇas record the chief incidents that have occurred over many millions of years, not only on this planet but also on other planets within the universe. Therefore all learned and realized Vedic scholars speak with references to the incidents in the Purāṇas. Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī accepts the Purāṇas to be as important as the Vedas themselves. Therefore in Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu he quotes the following verse from the Brahma-yāmala:

śruti-smṛti-purāṇādi- pañcarātra-vidhiṁ vinā aikāntikī harer bhaktir utpātāyaiva kalpate

“Devotional service of the Lord that ignores the authorized Vedic literatures like the Upaniṣads, Purāṇas and Nārada-pañcarātra is simply an unnecessary disturbance in society.” A devotee of Kṛṣṇa must refer not only to the Vedas, but also to the Purāṇas. One should not foolishly consider the Purāṇas mythological. If they were mythological, Śukadeva Gosvāmī would not have taken the trouble to recite the old historical incidents concerning the life of Ajāmila. Now the history begins as follows.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Concerning this subject, the wise cite the ancient story of Ajāmila. Please here from me that story in which there is a conversation between the servants of Viṣṇu and Yama. He narrates a story to show the meaning of his statement. Hear from me that story in which there is the conversation of the servants of Viṣṇu and Yama.
To illustrate the power of even unconscious chanting, Śukadeva introduces the historical episode of Viṣṇudūtas and Yamadūtas. The Purāṇas are not myth — they are recorded history meant to teach us how grace actually works.
Reflection Questions
  • Do I quietly dismiss the Purāṇic narratives as legend, or do I let them instruct my life?
  • Which historical incident from śāstra has shaped how I live — and which should?
📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 1