FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.1.11

श्रीबादरायणिरुवाच कर्मणा कर्मनिर्हारो न ह्यात्यन्तिक इष्यते । अविद्वदधिकारित्वात्प्रायश्चित्तं विमर्शनम् ॥ ११ ॥
śrī-bādarāyaṇir uvāca
[shree-baadaraayanir uvaacha]
karmaṇā karma-nirhāro
[karmanaa karma-nirhaaro]
na hy ātyantika iṣyate
[na hy aatyantika ishyate]
avidvad-adhikāritvāt
[avidvad-adhikaaritvaat]
prāyaścittaṁ vimarśanam
[praayashchittam vimarshanam]
śrī-bādarāyaṇiḥ uvāca — Śukadeva Gosvāmī, the son of Vyāsadeva, replied karmaṇā — by fruitive activities karma-nirhāraḥ — counteraction of fruitive activities na — not hi — indeed ātyantikaḥ — final iṣyate — becomes possible avidvat-adhikāritvāt — from being without knowledge prāyaścittam — real atonement vimarśanam — full knowledge of Vedānta.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-bādarāyaṇir uvāca
śrī-bādarāyaṇiḥ uvāca
Śukadeva Gosvāmī, the son of Vyāsadeva, replied
karmaṇā karma-nirhāro
karmaṇā
by fruitive activities
karma-nirhāraḥ
counteraction of fruitive activities
na hy ātyantika iṣyate
na
not
avidvad-adhikāritvāt
hi
indeed
ātyantikaḥ
final
iṣyate
becomes possible
avidvat-adhikāritvāt
from being without knowledge
prāyaścittaṁ vimarśanam
prāyaścittam
real atonement
vimarśanam
full knowledge of Vedānta.
Śukadeva Gosvāmī, the son of Vedavyāsa, answered: My dear King, since acts meant to neutralize impious actions are also fruitive, they will not release one from the tendency to act fruitively. Persons who subject themselves to the rules and regulations of atonement are not at all intelligent. Indeed, they are in the mode of darkness. Unless one is freed from the mode of ignorance, trying to counteract one action through another is useless because this will not uproot one’s desires. Thus even though one may superficially seem pious, he will undoubtedly be prone to act impiously. Therefore real atonement is enlightenment in perfect knowledge, Vedānta, by which one understands the Supreme Absolute Truth.

The guru, Śukadeva Gosvāmī, has examined Parīkṣit Mahārāja, and it appears that the King has passed one phase of the examination by rejecting the process of atonement because it involves fruitive activities. Now Śukadeva Gosvāmī is suggesting the platform of speculative knowledge. Progressing from karma-kāṇḍa to jñāna-kāṇḍa, he is proposing, prāyaścittaṁ vimarśanam: “Real atonement is full knowledge.” Vimarśana refers to the cultivation of speculative knowledge. In Bhagavad-gītā, karmīs, who are lacking in knowledge, are compared to asses. Kṛṣṇa says in Bhagavad-gītā (7.15) :

na māṁ duṣkṛtino mūḍhāḥ prapadyante narādhamāḥ māyayāpahṛta-jñānā āsuraṁ bhāvam āśritāḥ

“Those miscreants who are grossly foolish, lowest among mankind, whose knowledge is stolen by illusion, and who partake of the atheistic nature of demons, do not surrender unto Me.” Thus karmīs who engage in sinful acts and who do not know the true objective of life are called mūḍhas, asses. Vimarśana, however, is also explained in Bhagavad-gītā (15.15) , where Kṛṣṇa says, vedaiś ca sarvair aham eva vedyaḥ: the purpose of Vedic study is to understand the Supreme Personality of Godhead. If one studies Vedānta but merely advances somewhat in speculative knowledge and does not understand the Supreme Lord, one remains the same mūḍha. As stated in Bhagavad-gītā (7.19) , one attains real knowledge when he understands Kṛṣṇa and surrenders unto Him ( bahūnāṁ janmanām ante jñānavān māṁ prapadyate ). To become learned and free from material contamination, therefore, one should try to understand Kṛṣṇa, for thus one is immediately liberated from all pious and impious activities and their reactions.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śukadeva said: Completely counteracting sin is not at all possible by performing atonement, for it is done out of ignorance. Real atonement is attaining jñāna. By presenting a conclusion, Śukadeva again tests Parīkṣit who has passed the test. By atonement (karmanā) there cannot be complete (ātyantika) destruction of the sin (karma), but quick relief, because of the condition of the jīva who is qualified by ignorance. Sin appears repeatedly because of the presence of the seed of sin, ignorance. The chief atonement is jñāna (vimarśanam), since jñāna removes ignorance. By presenting the opinion of the jñānīs, Śukadeva again tests Parīkṣit.
Śukadeva agrees: atonement that is itself fruitive cannot end fruitive desire. He moves the conversation to the platform of knowledge — real atonement is enlightenment in the Absolute Truth through proper study of Vedānta.
Reflection Questions
  • Am I trying to fix bad karma with more karma, or am I seeking actual understanding of who I am?
  • What would 'real knowledge' look like in my life — and am I actually pursuing it, or just collecting information?
📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 1