FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.24.5

अन्तर्धानो नभस्वत्यां हविर्धानमविन्दत । य इन्द्रमश्वहर्तारं विद्वानपि न जघ्निवान् ॥ ५ ॥
antardhāno nabhasvatyāṁ
[antardhaano nabhasvatyaam]
havirdhānam avindata
[havirdhaanam avindata]
ya indram aśva-hartāraṁ
[ya indram ashva-hartaaram]
vidvān api na jaghnivān
[vidvaan api na jaghnivaan]
antardhānaḥ — the king of the name Antardhāna nabhasvatyām — unto his wife Nabhasvatī havirdhānam — of the name Havirdhāna avindata — obtained yaḥ — who indram — King Indra aśva-hartāram — who was stealing the horse of his father vidvān api — although he knew it na jaghnivān — did not kill.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
antardhāno nabhasvatyāṁ
antardhānaḥ
the king of the name Antardhāna
nabhasvatyām
unto his wife Nabhasvatī
havirdhānam avindata
havirdhānam
of the name Havirdhāna
avindata
obtained
ya indram aśva-hartāraṁ
yaḥ
who
indram
King Indra
aśva-hartāram
who was stealing the horse of his father
vidvān api na jaghnivān
vidvān api
although he knew it
na jaghnivān
did not kill.
Mahārāja Antardhāna had another wife, named Nabhasvatī, and by her he was happy to beget another son, named Havirdhāna. Since Mahārāja Antardhāna was very liberal, he did not kill Indra while the demigod was stealing his father’s horse at the sacrifice.

It is understood from various scriptures and Purāṇas that the King of heaven, Indra, was very expert in stealing and kidnapping. He could steal anything without being visible to the proprietor, and he could kidnap anyone’s wife without being detected. Once he raped the wife of Gautama Muni by using his disappearing art, and similarly by becoming invisible he stole the horse of Mahārāja Pṛthu. Although in human society such activities are considered abominable, the demigod Indra was not considered to be degraded by them. Although Antardhāna could understand that King Indra was stealing the horse from his father, he did not kill Indra, for he knew that if one who is very powerful sometimes commits an abominable act, it should be disregarded. In Bhagavad-gītā (9.30) it is clearly stated:

api cet sudurācāro bhajate mām ananya-bhāk sādhur eva sa mantavyaḥ samyag vyavasito hi saḥ

Thus the Lord says that even if a devotee commits an abominable act, he should be considered a sādhu, or a pious man, because of his unflinching devotion to the Lord. The devotees of the Lord never willingly commit any sinful act, but sometimes they commit something abominable due to their previous habits. Such acts should not be taken very seriously, however, because the devotees of the Lord are very powerful, whether they are on the heavenly planets or on this planet. If by chance they commit something abominable, it should not be taken into account, but should be overlooked.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Antardhāna, who did not kill Indra while Indra was stealing his father's horse, though he knew about it, in another wife, named Nabhasvatī, obtained a son named Havirdhāna. Nabhasvatī was another wife. Antardhāna, though knowing Indra had stolen the horse, did not kill him. Because of that Indra gave him the power of being invisible.
Antardhāna had another wife Nabhasvatī and son Havirdhāna; being liberal, he didn't kill Indra during the horse-theft. Generosity that refrains from final violence preserves long-term peace.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I tempted to finish off a wrongdoer when restraint would preserve future relations?
  • What does 'being liberal' look like with someone who has already wronged me?
📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 24