FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.22.13

कच्चिन्न: कुशलं नाथा इन्द्रियार्थार्थवेदिनाम् । व्यसनावाप एतस्मिन्पतितानां स्वकर्मभि: ॥ १३ ॥
kaccin naḥ kuśalaṁ nāthā
[kachchin nah kushalam naathaa]
indriyārthārtha-vedinām
[indriyaarthaartha-vedinaam]
vyasanāvāpa etasmin
[vyasanaavaapa etasmin]
patitānāṁ sva-karmabhiḥ
[patitaanaam sva-karmabhih]
kaccit — whether naḥ — our kuśalam — good fortune nāthāḥ — O masters indriya-artha — sense gratification as the ultimate goal of life artha-vedinām — persons who understand only sense gratification vyasana — illness āvāpe — got etasmin — in this material existence patitānām — those who are fallen sva-karmabhiḥ — by their own ability.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kaccin naḥ kuśalaṁ nāthā
kaccit
whether
naḥ
our
kuśalam
good fortune
nāthāḥ
O masters
indriyārthārtha-vedinām
indriya-artha
sense gratification as the ultimate goal of life
artha-vedinām
persons who understand only sense gratification
vyasanāvāpa etasmin
vyasana
illness
āvāpe
got
etasmin
in this material existence
patitānāṁ sva-karmabhiḥ
patitānām
those who are fallen
sva-karmabhiḥ
by their own ability.
Pṛthu Mahārāja inquired from the sages about persons entangled in this dangerous material existence because of their previous actions. Could such persons, whose only aim is sense gratification, be blessed with any good fortune?

Mahārāja Pṛthu did not ask the Kumāras about their good fortune, for the Kumāras are always auspicious by dint of their life in celibacy. Since they are always engaged on the path of liberation, there was no question of ill fortune. In other words, brāhmaṇas and Vaiṣṇavas who are strictly following the path of spiritual advancement are always fortunate. The question was asked by Pṛthu Mahārāja for his own sake, since he was in the position of a gṛhastha and in charge of the royal authority. Kings are not only gṛhasthas, who are generally absorbed in sense gratification, but are sometimes employed to kill animals in hunting because they have to practice the killing art; otherwise it is very difficult for them to fight their enemies. Such things are not auspicious. Four kinds of sinful activities — associating with woman for illicit sex, eating meat, intoxication and gambling — are allowed for the kṣatriyas. For political reasons, sometimes they have to take to these sinful activities. Kṣatriyas do not refrain from gambling. One vivid example is the Pāṇḍavas. When the Pāṇḍavas were challenged by the opposite party, Duryodhana, to gamble and risk their kingdom, they could not refrain, and by that gambling they lost their kingdom, and their wife was insulted. Similarly, the kṣatriyas cannot refrain from fighting if challenged by the opposite party. Therefore Pṛthu Mahārāja, taking consideration of all these facts, inquired whether there is any auspicious path. Gṛhastha life is inauspicious because gṛhastha means consciousness for sense gratification, and as soon as there is sense gratification, one’s position is always full of dangers. This material world is said to be padaṁ padaṁ yad vipadāṁ na teṣām, dangerous in every step ( Bhāg. 10.14.58 ). Everyone in this material world is struggling hard for sense gratification. Clearing all these points, Mahārāja Pṛthu inquired from the four Kumāras about the fallen conditioned souls who are rotting in this material world due to their past bad or inauspicious activities: “Is there any possibility for their auspicious spiritual life?” In this verse, the word indriyārthārtha-vedinām is very significant. It indicates persons whose only aim is to satisfy the senses. They are also described as patitānām, or fallen. Only one who stops all activities for sense gratification is considered to be elevated. Another significant word is sva-karmabhiḥ. One becomes fallen by dint of his own past bad activities. Everyone is responsible for his fallen condition because of his own activities. When activities are changed to devotional service, one’s auspicious life begins.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Is there hope for fallen persons like us who only know the goal of sense gratification, and who have fallen into saṁsāra which produces only suffering? Is there hope for us who only know the goal of happiness of sense objects (indriyārthārtha-vedinām), who have fallen in saṁsāra (etasmin), which gives rise to suffering (vyasanāvape)?
Related verses
Pṛthu asks: can those entangled by sense-gratification be blessed? The question on behalf of others is itself the disciple's act of service; he doesn't ask for himself.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose questions am I bringing to my teachers, and whose am I only asking for myself?
  • Where could I represent others' deeper concerns in my next conversation with a wise person?
📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 22