Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.14.39-40
तदुपद्रवमाज्ञाय लोकस्य वसु लुम्पताम् ।
भर्तर्युपरते तस्मिन्नन्योन्यं च जिघांसताम् ॥ ३९ ॥
चोरप्रायं जनपदं हीनसत्त्वमराजकम् ।
लोकान्नावारयञ्छक्ता अपि तद्दोषदर्शिन: ॥ ४० ॥
tad upadravam ājñāya
[tad upadravam aajnaaya]
lokasya vasu lumpatām
[lokasya vasu lumpataam]
bhartary uparate tasminn
[bhartary uparate tasminn]
anyonyaṁ ca jighāṁ-satām
[anyonyam cha jighaam-sataam]
cora-prāyaṁ jana-padaṁ
[chora-praayam jana-padam]
hīna-sattvam arājakam
[heena-sattvam araajakam]
lokān nāvārayaṣ chaktā
[lokaan naavaarayash chaktaa]
api tad-doṣa-darśinaḥ
[api tad-dosha-darshinah]
Word-for-word
tat
—
at that time
upadravam
—
the disturbance
ājñāya
—
understanding
lokasya
—
of the people in general
vasu
—
riches
lumpatām
—
by those who were plundering
bhartari
—
the protector
uparate
—
being dead
tasmin
—
King Vena
anyonyam
—
one another
ca
—
also
jighāṁ satām
—
desiring to kill
cora-prāyam
—
full of thieves
jana-padam
—
the state
hīna
—
bereft of
sattvam
—
regulation
arājakam
—
without a king
lokān
—
the thieves and rogues
na
—
not
avārayan
—
they subdued
śaktāḥ
—
able to do so
api
—
although
tat-doṣa
—
the fault of that
darśinaḥ
—
considering.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tad upadravam ājñāya
tat
at that time
upadravam
the disturbance
ājñāya
understanding
lokasya vasu lumpatām
lokasya
of the people in general
vasu
riches
lumpatām
by those who were plundering
bhartary uparate tasminn
bhartari
the protector
uparate
being dead
tasmin
King Vena
anyonyaṁ ca jighāṁ-satām
anyonyam
one another
ca
also
jighāṁ satām
desiring to kill
cora-prāyaṁ jana-padaṁ
cora-prāyam
full of thieves
jana-padam
the state
hīna-sattvam arājakam
hīna
bereft of
sattvam
regulation
arājakam
without a king
lokān nāvārayaṣ chaktā
lokān
the thieves and rogues
na
not
avārayan
they subdued
api tad-doṣa-darśinaḥ
śaktāḥ
able to do so
api
although
tat-doṣa
the fault of that
darśinaḥ
considering.
Upon seeing the dust storm, the saintly persons could understand that there were a great deal of irregularities due to the death of King Vena. Without government, the state was devoid of law and order, and consequently there was a great uprising of murderous thieves and rogues, who were plundering the riches of the people in general. Although the great sages could subdue the disturbance by their powers — just as they could kill the King — they considered it improper on their part to do so. Thus they did not attempt to stop the disturbance.
Purport
The saintly persons and great sages killed King Vena out of emergency, but they did not choose to take part in the government in order to subdue the uprising of thieves and rogues, which took place after the death of King Vena. It is not the duty of brāhmaṇas and saintly persons to kill, although they may sometimes do so in the case of an emergency. They could kill all the thieves and rogues by the prowess of their mantras, but they thought it the duty of kṣatriya kings to do so. Thus they reluctantly did not take part in the killing business.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Translation
Though they understood the disturbance to the population by people mutually looting wealth and killing, and understood that almost the whole population without a King had become thieves, devoid of sense control, the kṣatriyas, capable of preventing this, though seeing it happen, did not stop those who were looting others when the King had died.
The order of the sentence is as follows. Understanding the disturbance to the population by looters of wealth and killers, and understanding that almost the whole population had become thieves, persons capable of preventing this, even seeing it happen, the kṣatriyas, protecting only themselves, and being indifferent, thinking “Why should we protect others?” did not stop those who were looting others.
Related lectures
Personal Guidance
The sages, who had killed Vena out of emergency, didn't take up government themselves — saintly persons act decisively then withdraw. The mature pattern: intervene where necessary, then return to your own dharma.
Reflection Questions
- Where am I refusing to withdraw after necessary intervention, mistaking presence for service?
- What would a clean exit look like for me from a domain I entered as emergency aid?
My note
Source: vedabase.io