FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.13.22

किं वांहो वेन उद्दिश्य ब्रह्मदण्डमयूयुजन् । दण्डव्रतधरे राज्ञि मुनयो धर्मकोविदा: ॥ २२ ॥
kiṁ vāṁho vena uddiśya
[kim vaamho vena uddishya]
brahma-daṇḍam ayūyujan
[brahma-dandam ayooyujan]
daṇḍa-vrata-dhare rājñi
[danda-vrata-dhare raajni]
munayo dharma-kovidāḥ
[munayo dharma-kovidaah]
kim — why vā — also aṁhaḥ — sinful activities vene — unto Vena uddiśya — seeing brahma-daṇḍam — the curse of a brāhmaṇa ayūyujan — they desired to award daṇḍa-vrata-dhare — who carries the rod of punishment rājñi — unto the king munayaḥ — the great sages dharma-kovidāḥ — completely conversant with religious principles.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kiṁ vāṁho vena uddiśya
kim
why
vā
also
aṁhaḥ
sinful activities
vene
unto Vena
uddiśya
seeing
brahma-daṇḍam ayūyujan
brahma-daṇḍam
the curse of a brāhmaṇa
ayūyujan
they desired to award
daṇḍa-vrata-dhare rājñi
daṇḍa-vrata-dhare
who carries the rod of punishment
rājñi
unto the king
munayo dharma-kovidāḥ
munayaḥ
the great sages
dharma-kovidāḥ
completely conversant with religious principles.
Vidura also inquired: How is it that the great sages, who were completely conversant with religious principles, desired to curse King Vena, who himself carried the rod of punishment, and thus awarded him the greatest punishment [brahma-śāpa]?

It is understood that the king is able to give punishment to everyone, but in this case it appears that the great sages punished him. The king must have done something very serious; otherwise how could the great sages, who were supposed to be the greatest and most tolerant, still punish him in spite of their elevated religious consciousness? It appears also that the king was not independent of the brahminical culture. Above the king was the control of the brāhmaṇas, and if needed the brāhmaṇas would dethrone the king or kill him, not with any weapon, but with the mantra of a brahma-śāpa. The brāhmaṇas were so powerful that simply by their cursing one would immediately die.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Why did the sages, conversant with dharma, understanding their act would be sinful, punish and curse Vena, the King who is responsible for punishing others? Aṁhaḥ means offense. The King has the right to punish, and the sages have no right to punish the King.
How could the sages — knowing dharma — curse the king who himself holds the rod of punishment? Authority figures are not above being corrected by even more rooted authority; truth outranks office.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do I confuse my office with the truth, and resent correction that's actually warranted?
  • Whose office have I deferred to past the point where deeper authority should have stepped in?
📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 13