FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.32.12-15

आद्य: स्थिरचराणां यो वेदगर्भ: सहर्षिभि: । योगेश्वरै: कुमाराद्यै: सिद्धैर्योगप्रवर्तकै: ॥ १२ ॥ भेदद‍ृष्टय‍ाभिमानेन नि:सङ्गेनापि कर्मणा । कर्तृत्वात्सगुणं ब्रह्म पुरुषं पुरुषर्षभम् ॥ १३ ॥ स संसृत्य पुन: काले कालेनेश्वरमूर्तिना । जाते गुणव्यतिकरे यथापूर्वं प्रजायते ॥ १४ ॥ ऐश्वर्यं पारमेष्ठ्यं च तेऽपि धर्मविनिर्मितम् । निषेव्य पुनरायान्ति गुणव्यतिकरे सति ॥ १५ ॥
ādyaḥ sthira-carāṇāṁ yo
[aadyah sthira-charaanaam yo]
veda-garbhaḥ saharṣibhiḥ
[veda-garbhah saharshibhih]
yogeśvaraiḥ kumārādyaiḥ
[yogeshvaraih kumaaraadyaih]
siddhair yoga-pravartakaiḥ
[siddhair yoga-pravartakaih]
bheda-dṛṣṭyābhimānena
[bheda-drishtyaabhimaanena]
niḥsaṅgenāpi karmaṇā
[nihsangenaapi karmanaa]
kartṛtvāt saguṇaṁ brahma
[kartritvaat sagunam brahma]
puruṣaṁ puruṣarṣabham
[purusham purusharshabham]
sa saṁsṛtya punaḥ kāle
[sa samsritya punah kaale]
kāleneśvara-mūrtinā
[kaaleneshvara-moortinaa]
jāte guṇa-vyatikare
[jaate guna-vyatikare]
yathā-pūrvaṁ prajāyate
[yathaa-poorvam prajaayate]
aiśvaryaṁ pārameṣṭhyaṁ ca
[aishvaryam paarameshthyam cha]
te ’pi dharma-vinirmitam
[te ’pi dharma-vinirmitam]
niṣevya punar āyānti
[nishevya punar aayaanti]
guṇa-vyatikare sati
[guna-vyatikare sati]
ādyaḥ — the creator, Lord Brahmā sthira-carāṇām — of the immobile and mobile manifestations yaḥ — he who veda-garbhaḥ — the repository of the Vedas saha — along with ṛṣibhiḥ — the sages yoga-īśvaraiḥ — with great mystic yogīs kumāra-ādyaiḥ — the Kumāras and others siddhaiḥ — with the perfected living beings yoga-pravartakaiḥ — the authors of the yoga system bheda-dṛṣṭyā — because of independent vision abhimānena — by misconception niḥsaṅgena — nonfruitive api — although karmaṇā — by their activities kartṛtvāt — from the sense of being a doer sa-guṇam — possessing spiritual qualities brahma — Brahman puruṣam — the Personality of Godhead puruṣa-ṛṣabham — the first puruṣa incarnation saḥ — he saṁsṛtya — having attained punaḥ — again kāle — at the time kālena — by time īśvara-mūrtinā — the manifestation of the Lord jāte guṇa-vyatikare — when the interaction of the modes arises yathā — as pūrvam — previously prajāyate — is born aiśvaryam — opulence pārameṣṭhyam — royal ca — and te — the sages api — also dharma — by their pious activities vinirmitam — produced niṣevya — having enjoyed punaḥ — again āyānti — they return guṇa-vyatikare sati — when the interaction of the modes takes place.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ādyaḥ sthira-carāṇāṁ yo
ādyaḥ
the creator, Lord Brahmā
sthira-carāṇām
of the immobile and mobile manifestations
veda-garbhaḥ saharṣibhiḥ
yogeśvaraiḥ kumārādyaiḥ
yaḥ
he who
veda-garbhaḥ
the repository of the Vedas
siddhair yoga-pravartakaiḥ
bheda-dṛṣṭyābhimānena
niḥsaṅgenāpi karmaṇā
saha
along with
kartṛtvāt saguṇaṁ brahma
puruṣaṁ puruṣarṣabham
ṛṣibhiḥ
the sages
yoga-īśvaraiḥ
with great mystic yogīs
kumāra-ādyaiḥ
the Kumāras and others
siddhaiḥ
with the perfected living beings
yoga-pravartakaiḥ
the authors of the yoga system
bheda-dṛṣṭyā
because of independent vision
abhimānena
by misconception
sa saṁsṛtya punaḥ kāle
kāleneśvara-mūrtinā
jāte guṇa-vyatikare
yathā-pūrvaṁ prajāyate
aiśvaryaṁ pārameṣṭhyaṁ ca
te ’pi dharma-vinirmitam
niḥsaṅgena
nonfruitive
niṣevya punar āyānti
api
although
guṇa-vyatikare sati
karmaṇā
by their activities
kartṛtvāt
from the sense of being a doer
sa-guṇam
possessing spiritual qualities
brahma
Brahman
puruṣam
the Personality of Godhead
puruṣa-ṛṣabham
the first puruṣa incarnation
saḥ
he
saṁsṛtya
having attained
punaḥ
again
kāle
at the time
kālena
by time
īśvara-mūrtinā
the manifestation of the Lord
jāte guṇa-vyatikare
when the interaction of the modes arises
yathā
as
pūrvam
previously
prajāyate
is born
aiśvaryam
opulence
pārameṣṭhyam
royal
ca
and
te
the sages
api
also
dharma
by their pious activities
vinirmitam
produced
niṣevya
having enjoyed
punaḥ
again
āyānti
they return
guṇa-vyatikare sati
when the interaction of the modes takes place.
My dear mother, someone may worship the Supreme Personality of Godhead with a special self-interest, but even demigods such as Lord Brahmā, great sages such as Sanat-kumāra and great munis such as Marīci have to come back to the material world again at the time of creation. When the interaction of the three modes of material nature begins, Brahmā, who is the creator of this cosmic manifestation and who is full of Vedic knowledge, and the great sages, who are the authors of the spiritual path and the yoga system, come back under the influence of the time factor. They are liberated by their nonfruitive activities and attain the first incarnation of the puruṣa, but at the time of creation they come back in exactly the same forms and positions they previously had.

That Brahmā becomes liberated is known to everyone, but he cannot liberate his devotees. Demigods like Brahmā and Lord Śiva cannot give liberation to any living entity. As it is confirmed in Bhagavad-gītā, only one who surrenders unto Kṛṣṇa, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, can be liberated from the clutches of māyā. Brahmā is called here ādyaḥ sthira-carāṇām. He is the original, first-created living entity, and after his own birth he creates the entire cosmic manifestation. He was fully instructed in the matter of creation by the Supreme Lord. Here he is called veda-garbha, which means that he knows the complete purpose of the Vedas. He is always accompanied by such great personalities as Marīci, Kaśyapa and the seven sages, as well as by great mystic yogīs, the Kumāras and many other spiritually advanced living entities, but he has his own interest, separate from the Lord’s. Bheda-dṛṣṭyā means that Brahmā sometimes thinks that he is independent of the Supreme Lord, or he thinks of himself as one of the three equally independent incarnations. Brahmā is entrusted with creation, Viṣṇu maintains and Rudra, Lord Śiva, destroys. The three of them are understood to be incarnations of the Supreme Lord in charge of the three different material modes of nature, but none of them is independent of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Here the word bheda-dṛṣṭyā occurs because Brahmā has a slight inclination to think that he is as independent as Rudra. Sometimes Brahmā thinks that he is independent of the Supreme Lord, and the worshiper also thinks that Brahmā is independent. For this reason, after the destruction of this material world, when there is again creation by the interaction of the material modes of nature, Brahmā comes back. Although Brahmā reaches the Supreme Personality of Godhead as the first puruṣa incarnation, Mahā-Viṣṇu, who is full with transcendental qualities, he cannot stay in the spiritual world.

The specific significance of his coming back may be noted. Brahmā and the great ṛṣis and the great master of yoga (Śiva) are not ordinary living entities; they are very powerful and have all the perfections of mystic yoga. But still they have an inclination to try to become one with the Supreme, and therefore they have to come back. In the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam it is accepted that as long as one thinks that he is equal with the Supreme Personality of Godhead, he is not completely purified or knowledgeable. In spite of going up to the first puruṣa-avatāra, Mahā-Viṣṇu, after the dissolution of this material creation, such personalities again fall down or come back to the material creation.

It is a great falldown on the part of the impersonalists to think that the Supreme Lord appears within a material body and that one should therefore not meditate upon the form of the Supreme but should meditate instead on the formless. For this particular mistake, even the great mystic yogīs or great stalwart transcendentalists also come back again when there is creation. All living entities other than the impersonalists and monists can directly take to devotional service in full Kṛṣṇa consciousness and become liberated by developing transcendental loving service to the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Such devotional service develops in the degrees of thinking of the Supreme Lord as master, as friend, as son and, at last, as lover. These distinctions in transcendental variegatedness must always be present.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Sometimes, Brahmā, creator of the moving and non-moving beings, the knower of the Vedas, along with the sages, the lords of yoga, the Kumāras and other perfected beings, and practitioners of yoga, because of seeing difference and false identity by conceptions of being a doer enters into the Supreme Lord by execution of activities with detachment, but is born again after some time by the force of the Lord in the form of time, with the disturbance of the guṇas. The sages also, endowed with powers by their pious acts, come back when the guṇas become disturbed. “How can we understand that Brahmā gets liberation but he does not desire to liberate his devotees?” Brahmā’s liberation is also only an appearance. In the Gītā the Lord says mām eva ye prapadyante māyām etāṁ taranti te: those who surrender to me cross over my māyā. (BG 4.11) From this it is understood that even Brahmā does not get liberation if he does not have bhakti. What to speak of his inferiors then! That is explained these verses. Brahmā, though the cause (ādyaḥ) of living beings, though the knower of all the Vedas, along with sages like Marīci, the most perfect of yogīs, what to speak of practicing yogīs, has false identity because of seeing that he is different from the Lord. “I, Brahmā, am the creator, Viṣṇu is the maintainer, Śiva is the destroyer.” Thus thinking himself the best doer, he enters into Lord endowed with auspicious qualities (saguṇam) at the time of great destruction, and again, after some time, when mahat-tattva and other elements again appear because of disturbance of the guṇas, he is born again as Brahmā (yathā pūrvam). The sages accompanying Brahmā, enjoying powers such as aṇima by their karma, jñāna and yoga in the previous mahākalpa, come back again at the beginning of the next mahākalpa. How is it possible for the greatest of yogīs like the Kumāras and other perfected beings and gurus omniscient through yoga practice to have false conceptions of identity and to see difference? How could they be great masters of yoga but have false identity and see difference? Without false conceptions, they search out the undifferentiated Brahman, but, having the conception that Brahman takes on variety only through māyā, they see difference in the personal form of Lord who actually excludes difference, just as one sees difference between material objects. And they identify themselves as realizers of Brahman and reject the Lord with form. With this vision and identity, they think they are doers, having a right to action. Therefore they return. What has been described here are Brahmā, sages, yogīs, jñānīs and Kumāras who are devoid of bhakti in some particular universe. The Brahmās and sages of all other universes have bhakti, and thus attain liberation and prema-bhakti with dāsya and other relationships according to their degree of bhakti.
The cosmology here is not abstract scenery — it locates the reader inside a vast, intelligent order. Seeing your tiny role in this design quietly cools the urge to make yourself the centre. Its centre of gravity is Supreme Personality of Godhead.
Reflection Questions
  • Where have you been demanding outcomes from a system you did not design?
  • How could awe of the creation become a daily practice and not just a Sunday feeling?
📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 32