FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.27.2

स एष यर्हि प्रकृतेर्गुणेष्वभिविषज्जते । अहंक्रियाविमूढात्मा कर्तास्मीत्यभिमन्यते ॥ २ ॥
sa eṣa yarhi prakṛter
[sa esha yarhi prakriter]
guṇeṣv abhiviṣajjate
[guneshv abhivishajjate]
ahaṅkriyā-vimūḍhātmā
[ahankriyaa-vimoodhaatmaa]
kartāsmīty abhimanyate
[kartaasmeety abhimanyate]
saḥ — that very living entity eṣaḥ — this yarhi — when prakṛteḥ — of material nature guṇeṣu — in the modes abhiviṣajjate — is absorbed ahaṅkriyā — by false ego vimūḍha — bewildered ātmā — the individual soul kartā — the doer asmi — I am iti — thus abhimanyate — he thinks.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa eṣa yarhi prakṛter
saḥ
that very living entity
eṣaḥ
this
yarhi
when
prakṛteḥ
of material nature
guṇeṣv abhiviṣajjate
guṇeṣu
in the modes
abhiviṣajjate
is absorbed
ahaṅkriyā-vimūḍhātmā
ahaṅkriyā
by false ego
vimūḍha
bewildered
ātmā
the individual soul
kartāsmīty abhimanyate
kartā
the doer
asmi
I am
iti
thus
abhimanyate
he thinks.
When the soul is under the spell of material nature and false ego, identifying his body as the self, he becomes absorbed in material activities, and by the influence of false ego he thinks that he is the proprietor of everything.

Actually the conditioned soul is forced to act under the pressure of the modes of material nature. The living entity has no independence. When he is under the direction of the Supreme Personality of Godhead he is free, but when, under the impression that he is satisfying his senses, he engages in sense gratificatory activities, he is actually under the spell of material nature. In Bhagavad-gītā it is said, prakṛteḥ kriyamāṇāni: one acts according to the particular modes of nature he has acquired. Guṇa refers to the qualities of nature. He is under the qualities of nature, but he falsely thinks that he is the proprietor. This false sense of proprietorship can be avoided simply by engaging oneself in devotional service under the direction of the Supreme Lord or His bona fide representative. Arjuna, in Bhagavad-gītā, was trying to accept for himself the responsibility for killing his grandfather and teacher in the fight, but he became freed from that proprietorship of action when he acted under the direction of Kṛṣṇa. He fought, but he was actually freed from the reactions of fighting, although in the beginning, when he was nonviolent, unwilling to fight, the entire responsibility was upon him. That is the difference between liberation and conditioning. A conditioned soul may be very good and act in the mode of goodness, but still he is conditioned under the spell of material nature. A devotee, however, acts completely under the direction of the Supreme Lord. Thus his actions may not appear to be of a very high quality to the common man, but the devotee has no responsibility.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When the jīva, in waking and dream state, becomes absorbed in the guṇas of prakṛti, bewildered by ego, he thinks that he is the doer. Two verses describe saṁsāra due to false identity. This takes place during waking and dream states.
The verse insists on the Lord's specific identity — not an idea of God but a person with name, form, and intent. Vague spirituality cannot reach what only personal address can. Its centre of gravity is Supreme Personality of Godhead.
Reflection Questions
  • What in your life are you treating as 'mine' that the verse would call 'His'?
  • What single attribute of the Lord, taken seriously today, would reorganize a corner of your life?
📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 27