FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.24.37

एष आत्मपथोऽव्यक्तो नष्ट: कालेन भूयसा । तं प्रवर्तयितुं देहमिमं विद्धि मया भृतम् ॥ ३७ ॥
eṣa ātma-patho ’vyakto
[esha aatma-patho ’vyakto]
naṣṭaḥ kālena bhūyasā
[nashtah kaalena bhooyasaa]
taṁ pravartayituṁ deham
[tam pravartayitum deham]
imaṁ viddhi mayā bhṛtam
[imam viddhi mayaa bhritam]
eṣaḥ — this ātma-pathaḥ — path of self-realization avyaktaḥ — difficult to be known naṣṭaḥ — lost kālena bhūyasā — in the course of time tam — this pravartayitum — to introduce again deham — body imam — this viddhi — please know mayā — by Me bhṛtam — assumed.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
eṣa ātma-patho ’vyakto
eṣaḥ
this
ātma-pathaḥ
path of self-realization
naṣṭaḥ kālena bhūyasā
taṁ pravartayituṁ deham
avyaktaḥ
difficult to be known
naṣṭaḥ
lost
kālena bhūyasā
in the course of time
tam
this
pravartayitum
to introduce again
deham
body
imaṁ viddhi mayā bhṛtam
imam
this
viddhi
please know
mayā
by Me
bhṛtam
assumed.
This path of self-realization, which is difficult to understand, has now been lost in the course of time. Please know that I have assumed this body of Kapila to introduce and explain this philosophy to human society again.

It is not true that Sāṅkhya philosophy is a new system of philosophy introduced by Kapila as material philosophers introduce new kinds of mental speculative thought to supersede that of another philosopher. On the material platform, everyone, especially the mental speculator, tries to be more prominent than others. The field of activity of the speculators is the mind. There is no limit to the different ways in which one can agitate the mind, and thus one can put forward an unlimited number of theories. Sāṅkhya philosophy is not like that; it is not mental speculation. It is factual, but at the time of Kapila it was lost.

In due course of time, a particular type of knowledge may be lost or may be covered for the time being; that is the nature of this material world. A similar statement was made by Lord Kṛṣṇa in Bhagavad-gītā. Sa kāleneha mahatā yogo naṣṭaḥ: “In course of time the yoga system as stated in Bhagavad-gītā was lost.” It was coming in paramparā, in disciplic succession, but due to the passage of time it was lost. The time factor is so pressing that in the course of time everything within this material world is spoiled or lost. The yoga system of Bhagavad-gītā was lost before the meeting of Kṛṣṇa and Arjuna. Therefore Kṛṣṇa again enunciated the same ancient yoga system to Arjuna, who could actually understand Bhagavad-gītā. Similarly, Kapila also said that the system of Sāṅkhya philosophy was not exactly being introduced by Him; it was already current, but in course of time it was mysteriously lost, and therefore He appeared to reintroduce it. That is the purpose of the incarnation of Godhead. Yadā yadā hi dharmasya glānir bhavati bhārata. Dharma means the real occupation of the living entity. When there is a discrepancy in the eternal occupation of the living entity, the Lord comes and introduces the real occupation of life. Any so-called religious system that is not in the line of devotional service is called adharma-saṁsthāpana. When people forget their eternal relationship with God and engage in something other than devotional service, their engagement is called irreligion. How one can get out of the miserable condition of material life is stated in Sāṅkhya philosophy, and the Lord Himself is explaining this sublime system.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Understand that this path, difficult to know, was lost in time. I have taken this form to introduce this knowledge again. Avyaktaḥ means subtle. Though the Lord and his body are non-different, spiritual intelligence introduces difference even where there is non-difference. Thus the Lord says “I have taken this body.” This is a customary expression. It is like the following statement (which also cannot be taken literally.) sattvaṁ rajas tama iti nirguṇasya guṇās trayaḥ sthiti-sarga-nirodheṣu gṛhītā māyayā vibhoḥ The three guṇas of sattva, rajas and tamas, belonging to the Lord without guṇas, are accepted by the māyā of the Lord for creation, maintenance and destruction. SB 2.5.18
Devotion in this verse is not a feeling to wait for but a practice to take up. The heart catches up to the hands once we begin acting on the Lord's behalf instead of our own. The verse keeps returning to self-realization.
Reflection Questions
  • What ordinary activity could you re-aim today so it becomes an offering rather than a transaction?
  • Where in your life are you still 'enjoying' the fruits of work you call devotional?
📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 24