Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.8.9
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
The first living creature, Brahmā, is called ajaḥ because he did not take his birth from the womb of a mother materially born. He was directly born from the bodily expansion of the lotus flower of the Lord. Thus it is not readily understandable whether the body of the Lord and that of Brahmā are of the same quality or different. This must also be clearly understood. One thing is, however, certain: Brahmā was completely dependent on the mercy of the Lord because after his birth he could create living beings by the Lord’s grace only, and he could see the form of the Lord. Whether the form seen by Brahmā is of the same quality as that of Brahmā is a bewildering question, and Mahārāja Parīkṣit wanted to get clear answers from Śrīla Śukadeva Gosvāmī.
Certainly you should explain the difference. Brahmā (ajaḥ) is the controller of the individual bodies (bhūtāmā) since he represents the totality of bodies. Since he has come from the lotus in the navel of the Lord, by the Lord’s mercy alone he creates. And the Lord is not without form, because Brahmā saw that form. Though Brahmā is unborn, he appeared from the lotus in the Lord’s navel. Is the form of the Lord similar to that of the material body of Brahmā, or is it different? That you should explain.
- Padaseva Pr SB 02-08-09 Oriya
- Pariksit Pr SB 02-08-09 - Lord Brahma%27s Body Compared to Lord Vishnu - 2025-08-05 Harrisburg
- BBGS SB 02-08-09 Russian Translation - 1997-06-08 Almaty
- BCaitanyaS SB 02-08-09 Russian Tanslation - 2011-06-12 Lithuania
- BKG SB 02-08-09 - Demigods are serving Krishna - 2017-04-14 Sydney
- HanumatPSw SB 02-08-09 - 2014-10-03 ISKCON Hawaii
- HanumatPSw SB 02-08-09 - 2014-09-12 ISKCON Hawaii
- Where do I exaggerate my independence and forget that even Brahmā is dependent?
- What in my self-image needs revising in the face of total dependence?
My note
Source: vedabase.io