FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.17.41

प्रतिग्रहं मन्यमानस्तपस्तेजोयशोनुदम् । अन्याभ्यामेव जीवेत शिलैर्वा दोषद‍ृक् तयो: ॥ ४१ ॥
pratigrahaṁ manyamānas
[pratigraham manyamaanas]
tapas-tejo-yaśo-nudam
[tapas-tejo-yasho-nudam]
anyābhyām eva jīveta
[anyaabhyaam eva jeeveta]
śilair vā doṣa-dṛk tayoḥ
[shilair vaa dosha-drik tayoh]
pratigraham — accepting charity manyamānaḥ — considering tapaḥ — of one’s austerity tejaḥ — spiritual influence yaśaḥ — and fame nudam — destruction anyābhyām — by the other two (teaching Vedic knowledge and performing sacrifice) eva — indeed jīveta — a brāhmaṇa should live śilaiḥ — by collecting rejected grains in the field vā — or doṣa — the discrepancy dṛk — seeing tayoḥ — of those two.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
pratigrahaṁ manyamānas
pratigraham
accepting charity
manyamānaḥ
considering
tapas-tejo-yaśo-nudam
tapaḥ
of one’s austerity
tejaḥ
spiritual influence
yaśaḥ
and fame
nudam
destruction
anyābhyām eva jīveta
anyābhyām
by the other two (teaching Vedic knowledge and performing sacrifice)
eva
indeed
jīveta
a brāhmaṇa should live
śilair vā doṣa-dṛk tayoḥ
śilaiḥ
by collecting rejected grains in the field
vā
or
doṣa
the discrepancy
dṛk
seeing
tayoḥ
of those two.
A brāhmaṇa who considers that accepting charity from others will destroy his austerity, spiritual influence and fame should maintain himself by the other two brahminical occupations, namely teaching Vedic knowledge and performing sacrifice. If the brāhmaṇa considers that those two occupations also compromise his spiritual position, then he should collect rejected grains in agricultural fields and live without any dependence on others.

A pure devotee of the Lord should always remember that the Supreme Personality of Godhead will personally take care of him. As the Lord states in Bhagavad-gītā (9.22) :

ananyāś cintayanto māṁ ye janāḥ paryupāsate teṣāṁ nityābhiyuktānāṁ yoga-kṣemaṁ vahāmy aham

“But those who worship Me with devotion, meditating on My transcendental form — to them I carry what they lack and preserve what they have.”

A brāhmaṇa should not become a professional beggar for his personal maintenance. In India there are many so-called brāhmaṇas who sit at the gates of important temples and beg from everyone who comes and goes. If someone does not give a donation they become angry and chase that person. Similarly, in America there are many big preachers who collect huge amounts of money by begging on television and radio. If a brāhmaṇa or Vaiṣṇava considers that being a professional beggar is weakening his austerity, destroying his spiritual influence and giving him a bad reputation, then he should give up that process. One may beg everyone to contribute to the cause of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, but one will be diminished in austerity, influence and reputation by begging for one’s personal livelihood. A brāhmaṇa may then take up the task of teaching Vedic knowledge and performing sacrifice. But even such occupations do not bring one to the highest platform of trust in God. A brāhmaṇa who teaches as a means of livelihood may often be curbed in his teaching, and one who performs sacrifice may be manipulated by materialistic worshipers. In this way, a brāhmaṇa may be placed in an embarrassing and compromised position. Therefore a high-class brāhmaṇa or Vaiṣṇava ultimately will depend completely on the mercy of the Lord for his maintenance. The Lord promises to maintain His devotee, and an advanced Vaiṣṇava never doubts the word of the Lord.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
If a brāhmaṇa considers that accepting charity from others will destroy his austerity, power and fame, he should maintain himself by the other two brahminical occupations, namely teaching Vedic knowledge and performing sacrifice. If the brāhmaṇa considers that those two occupations faulty, then he should live by collecting rejected grains in agricultural fields. If he considers performing sacrifice and teaching to be faulty, then he lives by collecting grains which have fallen in the field and are rejected by the owner.
A brāhmaṇa who fears charity will hurt his austerity may live by teaching and sacrifice; if those too feel compromising, by gleaning grains. The Lord allows graceful descent through occupations rather than violation of principle.
Reflection Questions
  • Where could I 'descend gracefully' in occupation to preserve a higher principle?
  • What principle am I unwilling to compromise even for ease?
📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 17