Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.85.22
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
-
samaveta-artham
—
with a fitting meaning
Compound: samaveta (fitting, joined) + artha (meaning, purpose). Kṛṣṇa is acknowledging that Vasudeva's words are not merely affectionate — they are sam-aveta, technically correct.
-
tāta
—
dear Father
Vocative of tāta. The standard affectionate address from a son to a father. Even while teaching the highest tattva, Kṛṣṇa preserves the rasa-relationship by using this single word.
-
putrān samuddiśya
—
with reference to your sons
Accusative + gerund. Vasudeva used his sons as the demonstrandum of cosmic categories. Kṛṣṇa observes: you have done illustrative tattva-vyākhyā — taught categories by pointing at persons.
-
tattva-grāmaḥ
—
the assemblage of categories
Compound: tattva (essential principle) + grāma (collection, village). The whole inventory of sāṅkhya-vedānta tattvas. Kṛṣṇa is saying: you have, in your father's address, recited the entire tattva-grāma.
Posing as Vasudeva’s dependent son, Lord Kṛṣṇa expresses gratitude for His father’s edifying instructions.
I consider your words highly consistent, for you are pointing out your son as the highest truth just to teach others. This is the case in the upanisads, as in "O svetaketu, you are the highest truth. Tattvam asi."
Kṛṣṇa hides his powers in order to strengthen his father’s feelings for him as his son. Taking us sons, including Gada and others (plural), as subjects, you explain the greatness of the Lord (tattva-grama). He praises Vasudeva out of his natural modest conduct. The teaching is similar the Upaniṣad saying, “O Śvetaketu, you are that.”
The plural (vaḥ) is used to indicate respect for Vasudeva. I consider your words very correct in meaning (samavetārtham). O father, you are worthy of worship. The words are suitable to you. Or rejecting Vasudeva’s conceptions of Kṛṣṇa as the Lord, he confirms his conception of Kṛṣṇa as his son. You have referred to us as sons (putrān). The plural is used to indicate Balarāma also, and to indicate humility of himself by indicating his commonality.
- When did God last seem to affirm a piece of my understanding?
- Am I more concerned with grand sentiment in prayer than with simple accuracy?
A doctor calls his medical kit 'his children' and means it tenderly — but a colleague who hears him says, 'You speak truer than you know; the kit is also the discipline of medicine.' Kṛṣṇa receives Vasudeva's tattva-statement and ratifies it: 'Yes — you have explained the categories correctly using Us as the example.'
My note
Source: vedabase.io