Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.59.20
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
-
śaktyā
—
with his spear
Instrumental of śakti — the same word that names spiritual potency in Gauḍīya doctrine. Bhauma's weapon is a 'śakti' in the war-sense; the Lord's are the eternal hlādinī and saṁvit śaktis. Same word, opposite registers.
-
vajraḥ
—
Indra's thunderbolt
Indra's premier weapon, said to be forged from the sage Dadhīci's bones. The spear that bested vajra is no trifle — the verse establishes Bhauma's credentials precisely to make their irrelevance to Garuḍa more striking.
-
mālā - āhataḥ
—
struck by a garland
The chapter's most concentrated image: a war-spear treated as a garland. Gauḍīyas read it as a glimpse of Vaikuṇṭha-mood — where weapons of māyā arrive as flowers in the Lord's domain.
-
dvipaḥ
—
elephant
Lit. 'two-drinker' (drinks with trunk and mouth). Elephants are unmoved by flower-strikes; the simile lets Garuḍa's stature borrow the elephant's bulk while the spear borrows the flower's lightness.
Seeing Bhauma with the lance in his hand, Satyabhama said, "Kill him quickly." Therfore Krsna killed him then.
He saw his troops scattered (vidrāvitam) since they were afflicted by Garuḍa. Or he saw the troops somewhat scattered and somewhat afflicted. The army suffered because the elephants were their mainstay (and had fled). Or sainya can include the elephant drivers and horsemen. Struck by the weapon, Garuḍa did not feel pain (he did not shake). A condition is indicated by its external symptoms. Or, Garuḍa did not move (did not shake) from his place and his determination.
- What past 'thunderbolt-defeater' have you feared that wouldn't budge the Lord's bird?
- How does proximity to Kṛṣṇa reframe historic threats?
A spear that once defeated Indra's vajra strikes Garuḍa, and he does not even flinch — like an elephant pelted with a garland. The verse rewrites the cosmic power-hierarchy in one image: what cracks heaven's king is, against the Lord's bird, an offering of flowers.
My note
Source: vedabase.io