Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.54.40
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
-
kṣatriyāṇām
—
of the warriors
Genitive plural of kṣatriya. The varṇa whose dharma includes vadha as a possibility. Gauḍīyas read the kṣatriya-varṇa in Canto 10 as both honored and superseded — honored as Kṛṣṇa's own appearance varṇa, superseded by the bhakti He inaugurates.
-
prajāpati-vinirmitaḥ
—
established by the original progenitor (Brahmā)
Prajāpati (lord of beings, Brahmā) + vinirmitaḥ (built). The law's authority is traced to the demigod-creator. Gauḍīya note: even Brahmā's laws are conditional; only Kṛṣṇa's nāma-dharma is absolute.
-
bhrātā-api-bhrātaram-hanyāt
—
a brother may have to kill his brother
The four-word pāda joined as a unit. The Bhāgavatam quotes the law verbatim — and immediately names it ghoratama. The verse is the prosecution and the verdict in one breath.
-
ghora-tamaḥ
—
most terrible
Superlative of ghora (terrible). The same root as Aghāsura's name (a-ghora, 'not terrible' — he is named ironically). Balarāma uses the strongest negative adjective to flag the limits of varṇa-dharma.
-
dharmaḥ
—
code of sacred duty
From √dhṛ. The Lord's bhāgavata-dharma (cf. SB 1.2.6) is the supreme dharma — sva-dharma is provisional. Balarāma names sva-dharma here but the next verses already pivot toward a higher view.
Lord Balarāma, in the interest of fairness, is giving a complete analysis of the situation. Although one should not kill a relative, there are extenuating circumstances according to military codes. In the American Civil War, which took place in the 1860s, many families were divided between the army of the North and that of the South, and thus fratricidal killing unfortunately became a common affair. Such killing is certainly ghoratama, most dreadful. Yet such is the nature of the material world, where duty, honor and so-called justice often create conflict. Only on the spiritual platform, in pure Kṛṣṇa consciousness, can we transcend the unacceptable pain of material existence. Rukmī was maddened by pride and envy and thus could not understand anything about Kṛṣṇa or Kṛṣṇa consciousness.
He speaks again to Rukmini who was saying in her mind, "Your younger brother does not know this rule." "One should even kill ones brother. That is the rule of the scripture. What to speak then of a brother in law who is so vile?"
Since she still did not give up her grief, he again tried to enlighten her by showing sva-dharma of kṣatriyas. This dharma of the kṣatriyas—obligatory action generated by karma- is that a brother must kill his brother in a just war. This is dharma because it has been created by Brahmā. This means it is directed by the Vedas. Therefore (tataḥ) this is a terrible rule since it involves killing a brother. Śrīdhara Svāmī agrees with this meaning.
- Where does your tradition hold a 'dreadful law' that you've sanitized into normalcy?
- How do you acknowledge severity without escalating its use?
The kṣatriya-dharma, instituted by Brahmā, can require even fratricide — a law Balarāma calls 'most dreadful' (ghoratama). The Bhāgavatam stages a critique of dharma from within dharma itself: even when the rules are followed, they can produce horror. Only the bhakti that exceeds varṇa-dharma resolves the contradiction.
Standing between two armies of cousins and uncles, Arjuna dropped his bow precisely because kṣatriya-dharma was about to require him to do what Balarāma here calls ghoratama. He could not bear it.
Kṛṣṇa's answer in the Gītā is exactly what Balarāma is implying here: above varṇa-dharma stands sarva-dharmān parityajya — the surrender that transcends the calculus of duty. The Bhāgavatam reads BG 18.66 back into BG 1: even the most established duty-system is not the last word.
My note
Source: vedabase.io