FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.45.4

न लब्धो दैवहतयोर्वासो नौ भवदन्तिके । यां बाला: पितृगेहस्था विन्दन्ते लालिता मुदम् ॥ ४ ॥
na labdho daiva-hatayor
[na labdho daiva-hatayor]
vāso nau bhavad-antike
[vaaso nau bhavad-antike]
yāṁ bālāḥ pitṛ-geha-sthā
[yaam baalaah pitri-geha-sthaa]
vindante lālitā mudam
[vindante laalitaa mudam]
na — not labdhaḥ — obtained daiva — by fate hatayoḥ — who have been deprived vāsaḥ — residence nau — by Us bhavat - antike — in your presence yām — which bālāḥ — children pitṛ — of their parents geha — in the home sthaḥ — staying vindante — experience lālitāḥ — pampered mudam — happiness .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
na labdho daiva-hatayor
na
not
labdhaḥ
obtained
daiva
by fate
hatayoḥ
who have been deprived
vāso nau bhavad-antike
vāsaḥ
residence
nau
by Us
bhavat - antike
in your presence
yāṁ bālāḥ pitṛ-geha-sthā
yām
which
bālāḥ
children
pitṛ
of their parents
geha
in the home
sthaḥ
staying
vindante lālitā mudam
vindante
experience
lālitāḥ
pampered
mudam
happiness .
  • daiva - hatayoḥ — deprived by fate
    Daiva = providence; hata = struck down. Kṛṣṇa, who Himself is the controller of daiva, here speaks as a son whose family was struck by it — the maximum tenderness Yogamāyā permits Him.
  • vāsaḥ — residence
    Not visiting but vāsa — dwelling. Vāsa-bhakti, dwelling-with the Lord, is precisely what Vasudeva and Devakī were denied and what Nanda and Yaśodā received in Gokula. The single noun encodes the whole asymmetry of Canto 10.
  • lālitāḥ — pampered
    Past participle of √lāl — to fondle, indulge. The Vraja-vātsalya verb par excellence; cf. SB 10.8 where Yaśodā lālayati her bound son. Kṛṣṇa is using Vraja's word to describe what Mathurā lost.
  • mudam — happiness
    Muda — not sukha (comfort) but glad-heartedness. The specific joy of a coddled child, distinct from the joys of opulence Mathurā could supply. Kṛṣṇa is naming the rasa, not the resource.
  • pitṛ - geha — parents' home
    Pitṛ-geha is a recognized śāstric locus — the natural setting for the child's saṁskāras. Kṛṣṇa frames the deprivation in dharma's own vocabulary, so His parents' grief is sanctioned, not merely sentimental.
Deprived by fate, We could not live with you and enjoy the pampered happiness most children enjoy in their parents’ home.

Here Lord Kṛṣṇa points out that not only did His parents suffer in separation from Him and Balarāma, but the two boys also suffered in separation from Their parents.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Deprived by fate, We could not live with you and enjoy the pampered happiness most children enjoy in their parents' home.
Commentary

"We also have been unfortunate (daiva hatayoh)." However the words also mean the opposite: "We have attained good fortune in not attaining the happiness of ordinary children."

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Not only was your happiness destroyed, but ours also. We were excluded from happiness as sons. Or we did not have the opportunity to give you happiness, being useless sons. Thus all our happiness was destroyed. They then speak this verse. We, dependent on bad karma (adaiva-hatayoḥ), did not live with you. Children, living in their parents’ house, cared for by their parents, experience happiness. Or, children living in their parents’ house naturally experience happiness and are particularly cared for by them.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

We should not have deprived you of happiness, but we were deprived of happiness. By ill fate we could not live with you. He says this with great humility. However his words can also mean “Not affected by fate (adaiva-hatayoḥ), we could not live with you.” The Lord is not dependent on karma. Children, living in their parents’ house, cared for by their parents ( or even not cared for alalitā), experience happiness.

Related values
Anahankarah (Freedom from False Ego)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Tyaga (Renunciation / Letting Go)
Related verses
Deprived by fate, We could not live with you and enjoy pampered happiness in your home. The Lord admits His own loss too; separation was mutual, not just borne by parents.
Reflection Questions
  • What loss of your parents' company did you suffer that you've never owned aloud?
  • Where do you frame yourself only as the cause of others' suffering, not as a sufferer?

A child fed in a stranger's house can be safe and even cherished, but the lap of one's own parents is a different geography altogether. Kṛṣṇa names this geography to soothe Devakī — He knows what was taken, and He is calling it by its name.

📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 45