Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.40.25
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
-
anitya
—
non-eternal
a- + nitya. The first of three mistakes — taking the impermanent for the permanent. Gauḍīyas trace this as the root saṁskāra Bhakti must reverse: nitya-priya-vastu (Kṛṣṇa) vs. anitya-vastu (everything else).
-
viparyaya-matiḥ
—
inverted intelligence
Compound: viparyaya (inversion) + mati (intelligence). The technical Yoga-sūtra term (1.8) for wrong knowledge. Akrūra is naming his condition in Patañjali's own vocabulary, but in service of bhakti, not kaivalya.
-
dvandva-ārāmaḥ
—
delighting in dualities
Compound: dvandva (pair of opposites) + ārāma (pleasure-garden). Pleasure-seeking in heat/cold, gain/loss, honor/dishonor. Gītā 5.22 directly: ye hi saṁsparśa-jā bhogāḥ duḥkha-yonaya eva te.
-
ātmanaḥ priyam
—
the beloved of the self
Genitive + accusative. The Lord is the priya of the ātmā — the one true beloved. Gauḍīya reading: kṛṣṇa nitya-dāsa — Kṛṣṇa is the soul's eternal beloved-and-master. To miss this is to miss everything.
-
tamaḥ-viṣṭaḥ
—
covered by ignorance
Compound: tamas (darkness) + viṣṭa (entered). The third guṇa returning here in the personal confession — the same darkness that bound the cosmos in verse 11 binds Akrūra's own seeing.
Those with inverted intelligence, taking the temporary fruits of action to be eternal, taking the body to be the soul, and sorrows of house and home to be happiness, continue to sport with happiness and distress in this world. Because I am covered by the mode of ignorance, I cannot realize you, the object of love for the soul (atmanah priya).
With mistaken intelligence for certain (hi) I have enjoyed dualities and not recognized that you (tvā) are affectionate to me (and not my sons etc.) since you are Paramātmā. You should be known since you are more affectionate than family members. But I have not realized you. Or because of this, there are great obstacles. The three phrases show causes: my intelligence is reversed, I take pleasure in dualities and am covered in ignorance. I do not know you, who are dearer than myself. Otherwise, I would not be attached to my body and possessions.
- Where are you loving the wrong object because the right One was less visible?
- What would re-aiming a single attachment toward Kṛṣṇa look like?
A child mistakes the painted picture of fire for warmth and reaches in; mistakes a lamp for the sun; mistakes salty water for sweet. The whole machinery of dvandva-pleasure works on inverted vision — and the cost is that Kṛṣṇa, the only true priya, remains unrecognized in the very heart that contains Him.
Ajāmila spent his life loving his youngest son Nārāyaṇa — feeding him, calling his name, doting on him. At death the call for the son became the call for the Lord, and the Viṣṇudūtas arrived (SB 6.1–3).
Akrūra's verse 25 confesses what Ajāmila lived: na jāne tvā ātmanaḥ priyam — I did not know You as the true beloved of my self. The mercy is that even the wrongly-aimed love, if it touches a name of the Lord, finally reaches Him.
My note
Source: vedabase.io