Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.38.40
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
-
rāmaḥ
—
Lord Balarāma
The name Rāma here refers to Balarāma. Gauḍīyas distinguish this Rāma from Daśaratha's son Rāma; Balarāma is Bala-rāma, the strong Rāma, identical with Saṅkarṣaṇa in tattva. Bhāgavata's idiom uses the short form when the context is settled.
-
parama
—
the supreme
Highest. In compound parama-dharma-vit — the supreme knower of dharma. Gauḍīyas note that Balarāma's character throughout Bhāgavata is the upholder of dharma-vidhi; even hospitality is performed by Him with the precision of one who knows the highest dharma.
-
dharma - vit
—
knower of religious principles
Compound: dharma + vit (knower). One who has perfectly internalized dharma. Gauḍīyas read this not as legalism but as svarūpa-knowledge: Balarāma knows what each moment calls for, and hospitality at this moment is the dharma.
-
mukha - vāsaiḥ
—
with aromatic herbs for sweetening the mouth
Compound: mukha (mouth) + vāsa (perfume). The mouth-fragrance — typically betel, cardamom, lavaṅga — offered after a meal. Gauḍīyas note the śāstric completeness: bhakti pays attention to the end of things, not only the beginning.
-
mālyaiḥ
—
and flower garlands
Instrumental plural of mālya — garland. Garlanding the guest at meal's end is part of the formal welcome. Gauḍīyas read this as the visible mark of bhagavat-saṅga: one leaves a meeting with Him wearing a garland that came from His hand.
-
prītim
—
satisfaction
Prīti — affection, loving satisfaction. A distinct term from sukha and ānanda — prīti is reciprocal, two-way. Gauḍīyas regard prīti as the rasa-flavor specific to vātsalya and dāsya, and this verse closes Akrūra's reception in prīti, not in mere comfort.
The dative case is used instead of the possessive case in tasmai bhuktavate (when he had eaten). Balarāma was the knower of vaiṣṇava-dharma, how to treat devotees. He knew how to welcome the devotees. It was the Dvādaśī, time for breaking the fast, and especially Vaiṣṇavas should be properly respected at that time. Balarāma acted to teach the common people. He made Akrūra pleased. That day was Dvādaśī and in two days it would be Caturdaśī, the day for worshipping Śiva and the day that Kaṁsa would die. Out of eagerness to see the Lord, Akrūra had not broken the Ekādaśī fast. According to the rule one cannot break the fast in the evening. This rule was overlooked because he took his meal directly in the house of the Lord.
- What small sensory pleasures in your life could become part of devotional layering?
- Where do you reject simple comfort as if it were unspiritual?
The end of a feast is the proof of a host: betel-leaves, perfume, garland — the small details that say the guest is fully home. Balarāma does not let Akrūra's welcome trail off; the parām prīti is sustained right through to the closing fragrance.
My note
Source: vedabase.io