FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.33.28

आप्तकामो यदुपति: कृतवान्वै जुगुप्सितम् । किमभिप्राय एतन्न: शंशयं छिन्धि सुव्रत ॥ २८ ॥
āpta-kāmo yadu-patiḥ
[aapta-kaamo yadu-patih]
kṛtavān vai jugupsitam
[kritavaan vai jugupsitam]
kim-abhiprāya etan naḥ
[kim-abhipraaya etan nah]
śaṁśayaṁ chindhi su-vrata
[shamshayam chindhi su-vrata]
āpta - kāmaḥ — self-satisfied yadu - patiḥ — the master of the Yadu dynasty kṛtavān — has performed vai — certainly jugupsitam — that which is contemptible kim - abhiprāyaḥ — with what intent etat — this naḥ — our śaṁśayam — doubt chindhi — please cut su - vrata — O faithful upholder of vows .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
āpta-kāmo yadu-patiḥ
āpta - kāmaḥ
self-satisfied
yadu - patiḥ
the master of the Yadu dynasty
kṛtavān vai jugupsitam
kṛtavān
has performed
vai
certainly
jugupsitam
that which is contemptible
kim-abhiprāya etan naḥ
kim - abhiprāyaḥ
with what intent
etat
this
naḥ
our
śaṁśayaṁ chindhi su-vrata
śaṁśayam
doubt
chindhi
please cut
su - vrata
O faithful upholder of vows .
  • āpta-kāmaḥ — self-satisfied
    Āpta (attained) + kāma (desire). Synonym of satya-kāma (v.25), ātmārāma (v.19). Gauḍīyas: by emphasizing āpta-kāmaḥ in the very framing of the doubt, Parīkṣit shows he already half-knows the answer — the Lord cannot have acted from need.
  • jugupsitam — that which is contemptible
    Desiderative of √gup (to guard, hide). Literally 'that which one wishes to hide.' Gauḍīyas: the very word reveals the assumption being tested — only that which is shameful needs hiding. Vv.34-37 will show the rāsa needs no hiding because it is wholly pure.
  • su-vrata — O faithful upholder of vows
    Su (well) + vrata (vow). Parīkṣit addresses Śuka by his vrata-credentials precisely at this moment — only one rigorously fixed in dharma can adjudicate apparent transgressions of dharma. Gauḍīyas: the form of the address is itself an argument.
O faithful upholder of vows, please destroy our doubt by explaining to us what purpose the self-satisfied Lord of the Yadus had in mind when He behaved so contemptibly.

It is clear to the enlightened that these doubts will arise in the minds and hearts of persons unfamiliar with the transcendental pastimes of the Lord. Therefore since time immemorial great sages and enlightened kings like Parīkṣit Mahārāja have openly raised these questions to provide the authoritative answer for all posterity.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O faithful upholder of vows, please destroy our doubt by explaining to us what purpose the self-satisfied Lord of the Yadus had in mind when He behaved so contemptibly.
Commentary

"If you argue that for the Supreme Lord there is no adharma, what would be his purpose in performing such abominable acts? One cannot answer that he does so to fulfill his desires, because his desires are already fulfilled (aptakamah)." "But in this avatara he must do these condemned activities." "Then how could he be the head of the Yadus who follow the highest dharma? This is not only my doubt but the doubt of many people. It is our (nah) doubt. That the lord, though he is apta kama and atma rama, enjoyed enthusiastically with the gopis, who were the very form prema and bliss, is a very deep concept. Not understanding, doubts will arise among people. Though you are deeply committed to proper conduct (suvrata), you have become extremely involved with the lilas involving such condemned conduct. From this also doubt arises."

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

If he acts in this way, how can he be the leader of the Yadus who are the greatest followers of dharma? There is no other doubt. Parīkṣit says “we” to indicate many people in the assembly. The heart becomes disturbed by the fact that Kṛṣṇa was the crown jewel of good conduct and also the corrupter of scripture. O Śukadeva, fixed in brahmacārya (suvrata)! He acted contrary to your conduct. This conduct is condemned. Or, you are fixed in good conduct (suvrata) but if you cannot explain this, then good conduct that you and others follow will be destroyed. There is another opposite meaning. He is the leader of the devotees (yadu-patiḥ). To give mercy to devotees, he sometimes transgresses dharma. Did he do condemned acts (jugupsitam)? Never. He has done what is approved by the devotees. Why? He desired to spread his prema through the rāsa pastimes (āpta-kāmaḥ). By spreading prema, the highest result, he did not perform censured acts, but rather by the rāsa dance he satisfied all the devotees. There can be no doubt about this. Moving his folded hands, Parīkṣit asked Śukadeva to destroy the doubts of those assembled, including himself out of humility. He says destroy “generally (prāya)” since some present, the devotees who know the conclusions of scripture and were inundated with rasa had no doubts about the rāsa pastimes filled with prema. I ask for the benefit of the inattentive members of the assembly. This is not my doubt. Therefore cut the chains of their doubts so they no longer have fear (abhi), O Śukadeva, fixed in bhakti (suvrata)!

Related values
Anahankarah (Freedom from False Ego)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)
Related verses
Concepts
DharmaAvataraAtma
Parīkṣit asks Śukadeva to destroy his doubt by explaining what purpose the self-satisfied Lord had in seemingly contemptible behavior. Doubts about the Lord's actions deserve to be dissolved by clear knowledge, not by guilt or repression.
Reflection Questions
  • Which doubt are you ignoring rather than asking a teacher to dissolve?
  • Are you willing to let your view of Kṛṣṇa be corrected rather than defended?

A good doctor does not refuse to name the disease the family is afraid to mention. Parīkṣit names it: jugupsitam — contemptible. The directness is itself respect: he trusts Śuka to give the medicine without flinching.

📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 33