Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.18.50
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
The transcendentalists are the empiric philosophers, the mystics and the devotees of the Lord. Empiric philosophers aim at the perfection of merging into the being of the Absolute, mystics aim at perceiving the all-pervading Supersoul, and the devotees of the Lord are engaged in the transcendental loving service of the Personality of Godhead. Since Brahman, Paramātmā and Bhagavān are different phases of the same Transcendence, all these transcendentalists are beyond the three modes of material nature. Material distresses and happinesses are products of the three modes, and therefore the causes of such material distress and happiness have nothing to do with the transcendentalists. The King was a devotee, and the ṛṣi was a mystic. Therefore both of them were unattached to the accidental incident created by the supreme will. The playful child was an instrument in fulfilling the Lord’s will.
Thus end the Bhaktivedanta purports of the First Canto, Eighteenth Chapter, of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, entitled “Mahārāja Parīkṣit Cursed by a Brāhmaṇa Boy.”
This is reasonable. Dvandveṣu means in happiness and distress. Aguṇāśrayaḥ means “they are not the shelter of material happiness and distress.”
Chapter Nineteen The Arrival of Śukadeva
- What does it mean for me to be 'transcendentally engaged' rather than worldly engaged?
- Where could I practice this distinction this week?
My note
Source: vedabase.io