FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.18.47

अपापेषु स्वभृत्येषु बालेनापक्‍वबुद्धिना । पापं कृतं तद्भगवान् सर्वात्मा क्षन्तुमर्हति ॥ ४७ ॥
apāpeṣu sva-bhṛtyeṣu
[apaapeshu sva-bhrityeshu]
bālenāpakva-buddhinā
[baalenaapakva-buddhinaa]
pāpaṁ kṛtaṁ tad bhagavān
[paapam kritam tad bhagavaan]
sarvātmā kṣantum arhati
[sarvaatmaa kshantum arhati]
apāpeṣu — unto one who is completely free from all sins sva-bhṛtyeṣu — unto one who is subordinate and deserves to be protected bālena — by a child apakva — who is immature buddhinā — by intelligence pāpam — sinful act kṛtam — has been done tat bhagavān — therefore the Personality of Godhead sarva-ātmā — who is all-pervading kṣantum — just to pardon arhati — deserve.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
apāpeṣu sva-bhṛtyeṣu
apāpeṣu
unto one who is completely free from all sins
sva-bhṛtyeṣu
unto one who is subordinate and deserves to be protected
bālenāpakva-buddhinā
bālena
by a child
apakva
who is immature
buddhinā
by intelligence
pāpaṁ kṛtaṁ tad bhagavān
pāpam
sinful act
kṛtam
has been done
tat bhagavān
therefore the Personality of Godhead
sarvātmā kṣantum arhati
sarva-ātmā
who is all-pervading
kṣantum
just to pardon
arhati
deserve.
Then the ṛṣi prayed to the all-pervading Personality of Godhead to pardon his immature boy, who had no intelligence and who committed the great sin of cursing a person who was completely free from all sins, who was subordinate and who deserved to be protected.

Everyone is responsible for his own action, either pious or sinful. Ṛṣi Śamīka could foresee that his son had committed a great sin by cursing Mahārāja Parīkṣit, who deserved to be protected by the brāhmaṇas, for he was a pious ruler and completely free from all sins because of his being a first-class devotee of the Lord. When an offense is done unto the devotee of the Lord, it is very difficult to overcome the reaction. The brāhmaṇas, being at the head of the social orders, are meant to give protection to their subordinates and not to curse them. There are occasions when a brāhmaṇa may furiously curse a subordinate kṣatriya or vaiśya, etc., but in the case of Mahārāja Parīkṣit there were no grounds, as already explained. The foolish boy had done it out of sheer vanity in being a brāhmaṇa’s son, and thus he became liable to be punished by the law of God. The Lord never forgives a person who condemns His pure devotee. Therefore, by cursing a king the foolish Śṛṅgi had committed not only a sin but also the greatest offense. Therefore the ṛṣi could foresee that only the Supreme Personality of Godhead could save his boy from his sinful act. He therefore directly prayed for pardon from the Supreme Lord, who alone can undo a thing which is impossible to change. The appeal was made in the name of a foolish boy who had developed no intelligence at all.

A question may be raised herein that since it was the desire of the Lord that Parīkṣit Mahārāja be put into that awkward position so that he might be delivered from material existence, then why was a brāhmaṇa’s son made responsible for this offensive act? The answer is that the offensive act was performed by a child only so that he could be excused very easily, and thus the prayer of the father was accepted. But if the question is raised why the brāhmaṇa community as a whole was made responsible for allowing Kali into the world affairs, the answer is given in the Varāha Purāṇa that the demons who acted inimically toward the Personality of Godhead but were not killed by the Lord were allowed to take birth in the families of brāhmaṇas to take advantage of the Age of Kali. The all-merciful Lord gave them a chance to have their births in the families of pious brāhmaṇas so that they could progress toward salvation. But the demons, instead of utilizing the good opportunity, misused the brahminical culture due to being puffed up by vanity in becoming brāhmaṇas. The typical example is the son of Śamīka Ṛṣi, and all the foolish sons of brāhmaṇas are warned hereby not to become as foolish as Śṛṅgi and to be always on guard against the demoniac qualities which they had in their previous births. The foolish boy was, of course, excused by the Lord, but others, who may not have a father like Śamīka Ṛṣi, will be put into great difficulty if they misuse the advantages obtained by birth in a brāhmaṇa family.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Lord, the soul of all beings, should forgive the sin committed to your innocent devotee by this boy of immature intelligence.
Commentary

Seeing no other means of atonement because of the seriousness of the sin (committed by his son), explaining the sin, he prays to the Lord

The ṛṣi prayed to the all-pervading Lord to pardon his immature boy, who had cursed a sinless, subordinate, and merciful person. Mature elders pray for the consequences of younger excess.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do I need to pray for the consequences of younger excess — mine or someone close to me?
  • What undoing-prayer is mine to offer?
📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 18