FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.16.5

शौनक उवाच कस्य हेतोर्निजग्राह कलिं दिग्विजये नृप: । नृदेवचिह्नधृक्‍शूद्रकोऽसौ गां य: पदाहनत् । तत्कथ्यतां महाभाग यदि कृष्णकथाश्रयम् ॥ ५ ॥
śaunaka uvāca
[shaunaka uvaacha]
kasya hetor nijagrāha
[kasya hetor nijagraaha]
kaliṁ digvijaye nṛpaḥ
[kalim digvijaye nripah]
nṛdeva-cihna-dhṛk śūdra-
[nrideva-chihna-dhrik shoodra-]
ko ’sau gāṁ yaḥ padāhanat
[ko ’sau gaam yah padaahanat]
tat kathyatāṁ mahā-bhāga
[tat kathyataam mahaa-bhaaga]
yadi kṛṣṇa-kathāśrayam
[yadi krishna-kathaashrayam]
śaunakaḥ uvāca — Śaunaka Ṛṣi said kasya — for what hetoḥ — reason nijagrāha — sufficiently punished kalim — the master of the Age of Kali digvijaye — during the time of his world tour nṛpaḥ — the King nṛ-deva — royal person cihna-dhṛk — decorated like śūdrakaḥ — lowest of the śūdras asau — he gām — cow yaḥ — one who padā ahanat — struck on the leg tat — all that kathyatām — please describe mahā-bhāga — O greatly fortunate one yadi — if, however kṛṣṇa — about Kṛṣṇa kathā-āśrayam — related with His topics.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śaunaka uvāca
śaunakaḥ uvāca
Śaunaka Ṛṣi said
kasya hetor nijagrāha
kasya
for what
hetoḥ
reason
nijagrāha
sufficiently punished
kaliṁ digvijaye nṛpaḥ
kalim
the master of the Age of Kali
digvijaye
during the time of his world tour
nṛpaḥ
the King
nṛdeva-cihna-dhṛk śūdra-
nṛ-deva
royal person
cihna-dhṛk
decorated like
śūdrakaḥ
lowest of the śūdras
ko ’sau gāṁ yaḥ padāhanat
tat kathyatāṁ mahā-bhāga
yadi kṛṣṇa-kathāśrayam
asau
he
gām
cow
yaḥ
one who
padā ahanat
struck on the leg
tat
all that
kathyatām
please describe
mahā-bhāga
O greatly fortunate one
yadi
if, however
kṛṣṇa
about Kṛṣṇa
kathā-āśrayam
related with His topics.
Śaunaka Ṛṣi inquired: Why did Mahārāja Parīkṣit simply punish him, since he was the lowest of the śūdras, having dressed as a king and having struck a cow on the leg? Please describe all these incidents if they relate to the topics of Lord Kṛṣṇa.

Śaunaka and the ṛṣis were astonished to hear that the pious Mahārāja Parīkṣit simply punished the culprit and did not kill him. This suggests that a pious king like Mahārāja Parīkṣit should have at once killed an offender who wanted to cheat the public by dressing like a king and at the same time daring to insult the purest of the animals, a cow. The ṛṣis in those days, however, could not even imagine that in the advanced days of the Age of Kali the lowest of the śūdras will be elected as administrators and will open organized slaughterhouses for killing cows. Anyway, although hearing about a śūdraka who was a cheat and insulter of a cow was not very interesting to the great ṛṣis, they nevertheless wanted to hear about it to see if the event had any connection with Lord Kṛṣṇa. They were simply interested in the topics of Lord Kṛṣṇa, for anything that is dovetailed with the narration of Kṛṣṇa is worth hearing. There are many topics in the Bhāgavatam about sociology, politics, economics, cultural affairs, etc., but all of them are in relation with Kṛṣṇa, and therefore all of them are worth hearing. Kṛṣṇa is the purifying ingredient in all matters, regardless of what they are. In the mundane world, everything is impure due to its being a product of the three mundane qualities. The purifying agent, however, is Kṛṣṇa.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śaunaka said: Why did the king while touring punish Kali but not kill him? The person dressed as a king who was kicking the cow was a very low śūdra.
Commentary

Why did he punish him but not kill him (nijagrāha)? That low śūdra deserved to be killed.

Śaunaka asks: why only punish him? Please describe these incidents if they relate to Kṛṣṇa's pastimes. Even the curious want stories grounded in the Lord. Topics gain weight by relation to Him.
Reflection Questions
  • What stories am I drawn to that connect — even indirectly — to the Lord?
  • Where could I curate my listening more carefully?
📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 16