Bhagavad-gītā 17.15
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
-
anudvega - karam
—
not agitating
Compound: an- (not) + udvega (agitation, distress) + kara (causing). The first criterion of speech-austerity is negative: speech that does not throw the hearer into agitation. Truthful speech that needlessly disturbs fails this test.
-
satyam
—
truthful
From √as — to be. Satya is not merely 'accurate' but 'rooted in being.' Speech corresponds to what is, not to what one wishes were. The second criterion: anudvega without satya becomes flattery.
-
priya
—
dear, pleasing
From √prī — to please. The third criterion: speech delivered in a register that does not abrade. The four criteria together form a tight grid: anudvega and priya govern the manner; satya and hita govern the substance.
-
hitam
—
beneficial
From √dhā — placed (well-placed for the hearer). The fourth criterion: speech must aim at the listener's actual welfare. Truth said for one's own satisfaction at another's expense fails this test.
-
svādhyāya
—
of Vedic study
Compound: sva (one's own) + adhyāya (recitation, study). 'One's own daily recitation' — the specific term for the brāhmaṇical practice of reciting one's portion of the Veda. The verse closes with the affirmative half of speech-tapas: the tongue not only restrains but recites. Speech-austerity is half restraint, half recitation.
-
abhyasanam
—
practice
From abhi + √as — to throw oneself toward, to practise repeatedly. Critical word: the verse does not say svādhyāya alone but svādhyāya-abhyasanam — habitual, daily, repeated study. Not one reading but the discipline of returning.
One should not speak in such a way as to agitate the minds of others. Of course, when a teacher speaks, he can speak the truth for the instruction of his students, but such a teacher should not speak to those who are not his students if he will agitate their minds. This is penance as far as talking is concerned. Besides that, one should not talk nonsense. The process of speaking in spiritual circles is to say something upheld by the scriptures. One should at once quote from scriptural authority to back up what he is saying. At the same time, such talk should be very pleasurable to the ear. By such discussions, one may derive the highest benefit and elevate human society. There is a limitless stock of Vedic literature, and one should study this. This is called penance of speech.
Anudvega-karam means that in calling out to other persons who have done harm to oneself, one does not cause any disturbance to them.
The speech does not cause fear at all in anyone (anudvega karam). It is authoritative (satyam). It is pleasing to the hearer (priya), and at last beneficial for the hearer (hitam). Speech with these four qualities and as well recitation (abhyāsanam) of the Vedas (svādhyāya) is the austerity to be achieved by speech (vāṅ mayam).
Austerity of speech (5 points)
17.15 अनुद्वेगकरम् causing no excitement? वाक्यम् speech? सत्यम् truthful? प्रियहितम् pleasant and beneficial? च and? यत् which? स्वाध्यायाभ्यसनम् the practice of the study of the Vedas? च and? एव also? वाङ्मयम् of speech? तपः austerity? उच्यते is called.Commentary The words of the man who practises the austerity of speech cannot cause pain to others. His words will bring cheer and solace to others. His words prove beneficial to all. The organ of speech causes great distraction of mind. Control of speech is a difficult discipline but you will have to practise it if you want to attain supreme peace. Nothing is impossible for a man who has a firm determination? sincerity of purpose? iron will? patience and perseverance.It is said in Manu Smritiसत्यं ब्रूयात् प्रियं ब्रूयात् न ब्रूयात् सत्यमप्रियम्।प्रियं च नानृतं ब्रूयात् एष धर्मः सनातनः।।One should speak what is true one should speak what is pleasant. One should not speak what is true if it is not pleasant nor what is pleasant if it is false. This is the ancient Dharma.Excitement Pain to living beings.Speech? to be an austerity? must form an invariable combination of all the four attributes mentioned in this verse? viz.? nonexciting or nonpainful? truthful? pleasant and beneficial if it is wanting in one or the other of these attributes? it cannot form the austerity of speech. Speech may be pleasant but it it is lacking in the other three attributes? it will no longer be an austerity of speech.
- BG 17 15-16 - Radhakrishna Prabhu - Leicester 2008-11-30
- BG 17 15-22 - Chaitanya Charan Prabhu.MP3
- BG 17 15 - Bhakti Vikas Swami - Kuwait 2013-05-25 Hindi
- BG 17 15 - Madhu Gopal Prabhu - ISKCON Radhadesh 2011-06-24
- BG 17 15 - Satya Gopinath Prabhu - ISKCON Tirupati 2010-03-25 Telugu.MP3
- BG 17 15 - Sridhar Swami - Ljubljana 2002-01-29
- Jitamitra Pr Hindi BG 17-15 - 2016-02-03
- Padaseva Pr BG 17-15 Oriya
- Rasika Govinda Pr BG 17-15 Tamil - 2018-04-26
- Vaisesika Pr BG 17-15 - 2017-04-14
- Bhakti Vikas Sw Hindi BG 17-15 - Svadhyaya Gauna Upay he - 2013-05-25 Kuwait
- JAS BG 17-15
- JAS BG 17-15 - Austerities Of The Speech - 2010-02-09 ISKCON Chowpatty
- PrahladAnS BG 17-15 Slovenian Translation - Prabupadove aktivnosti v zavesti Kri%C5%A1ne - 2023-06-15 ISKCON Slovenia
- PrahladAnS BG 17-15 - Prabuphadas actions in Krishna consciousness - 2023-06-15 ISKCON Slovenia
- Sridhar Sw BG 17-15 - Become really happy - Ljubljana 2002-01-29
- Sukadeva Sw Telugu BG 17-15
- Audit your speech for the four qualities.
- Address one specific failing.
- Add regular scripture study.
- What speech-quality failing of mine is most evident?
- What study schedule would I commit to?
Speech austerity is like a river that has learned not to flood. The water still flows abundantly — but inside its banks, where it nourishes rather than drowns. Truthful, pleasing, beneficial, non-agitating — these are the banks. Vedic study is the spring that keeps the river fed.
Throughout the Mahābhārata, Vidura speaks to his blind half-brother Dhṛtarāṣṭra with the four qualities Kṛṣṇa lists here: anudvega-karam (never agitating beyond what truth required), satyam (truthful even when Dhṛtarāṣṭra wished otherwise), priyam (offered with affection), hitam (always for the king's actual welfare).
The Vidura-nīti — his long counsel in the Udyoga-parva — is the canonical example of vāk-mayam tapas: speech turned into a discipline of dharma. He spoke at length and yet every sentence was tapas, not chatter.
My note
Source: vedabase.io