Bhagavad-gītā 18.4
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
-
niścayam
—
settled conclusion, certainty
Not opinion, not argument — niścaya. The chapter is structured around final rulings, and this is the first. Kṛṣṇa is closing a debate, not opening one.
-
tyāge
—
in the matter of renunciation
Locative. He is ruling specifically *on the field of tyāga*. The earlier verse staged the question; here he locates his answer precisely.
-
tri-vidhaḥ
—
of three kinds
The chapter's master pattern: every category — tyāga, knowledge, action, doer, intelligence, determination, happiness — will be split into the three guṇas. This is the first announcement of the schema.
-
puruṣa-vyāghra
—
O tiger among men
Direct flattery before a hard teaching. Kṛṣṇa names Arjuna's kṣatriya fierceness because what is coming will require him to keep fighting, not to retreat into renunciation.
-
samprakīrtitaḥ
—
is fully declared
The prefix sam- adds completeness. This is no whisper of opinion — it is the śāstric declaration, sealed.
Although there are differences of opinion about renunciation, here the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Śrī Kṛṣṇa, gives His judgment, which should be taken as final. After all, the Vedas are different laws given by the Lord. Here the Lord is personally present, and His word should be taken as final. The Lord says that the process of renunciation should be considered in terms of the modes of material nature in which it is performed.
In this verse the Lord states His opinion. Tyāga has three types: in sattva, rajas and tamas. The Lord delays describing these three types till verse seven, and then starts with a description of tyāga in the mode of tamas. From the use of the word sannyāsa in describing tamasic tyāga in that verse, it is understood that tyāga and sannyāsa have the same meaning in the opinion of the Lord.
After describing the different opinions, the Lord states his own opinion. “Please listen to the conclution coming from Me, the omniscient Supreme Lord, concerning the subject of tyāga, about which there are many opinions.” “Since you have just explained about tyāga, what more must be heard?” “You must hear because (hi) three types of tyāga are discerened by the learned, by distinction of sattva, rajas and tamas (tri vidhaḥ). That which is difficult to understand should be heard. Therefore listen about three types.” The description actually starts in verse 7.
Arjuna replies here: "I asked what is the difference between tyaga and sannyasa, and Your answer is that there is three types of tyaga." And Krsna says: "Don't worry, now I'll tell you definitively!"
But Krishna’s opinion is that there are three kinds of renunciation based on the three modes
18.4 निश्चयम् conclusion or the final truth? श्रृणु hear? मे My? तत्र there? त्यागे about abandonment? भरतसत्तम O best of the Bharatas? त्यागः abandonment? हि verily? पुरुषव्याघ्र O best of men? त्रिविधः of three kinds? संप्रकीर्तितः has been declared (to be).Commentary Now the Lord gives His own decisive opinion. It is declared in the scriptures that renunciation is of three kinds? viz.? Sattvic? Rajasic and Tamasic. The Lord alone can teach the truth about the subject. Whoever wants to be liberated from the miseries of this world must understand the real nature of renunciation.
- BG 18 04 - Karunamayi Mataji - ISKCON Radhadesh 2011-07-05
- BG 18 04 - Prahladananda Swami - Los Angeles 2002-12-02
- Priya Valabha Mataji BG 18-04-05 Hindi
- Jitamitra Pr Hindi Comments - BG 18-04 - 2016-03-02 EOK
- Rasika Govinda Pr BG 18-04-05 Tamil - 2018-05-10
- Shubha Krishna Pr BG 18-04-05 Hindi
- PrahladAnS BG 18-04 - 2002-12-02
- PrahladAnS BG 18-04 - Hear Means To Hear See - 2002-12-02 Los Angeles
- Treat Kṛṣṇa's definitive opinion as the final reference.
- Don't average across philosophical positions.
- Take His verdict seriously.
- Where do I average instead of taking the definitive verdict?
- What does taking it seriously change?
When two surgeons disagree, the patient does not pick by majority — he turns to the chief surgeon for the binding judgment. Kṛṣṇa, having let the two schools state their cases, now steps forward as the final authority and announces His own ruling.
My note
Source: vedabase.io