FolioCorpusBhagavad-gītā

Bhagavad-gītā 11.53

నాహం వేదైర్న తపసా న దానేన న చేజ్యయా । శక్య ఏవంవిధో ద్రష్టుం దృష్టవానసి మాం యథా ॥ ౫౩ ॥
nāhaṁ vedair na tapasā
[naaham vedair na tapasaa]
na dānena na cejyayā
[na daanena na chejyayaa]
śakya evaṁ-vidho draṣṭuṁ
[shakya evam-vidho drashtum]
dṛṣṭavān asi māṁ yathā
[drishtavaan asi maam yathaa]
Word-for-word
na — never aham — I vedaiḥ — by study of the Vedas na — never tapasā — by serious penances na — never dānena — by charity na — never ca — also ijyayā — by worship śakyaḥ — it is possible evam - vidhaḥ — like this draṣṭum — to see dṛṣṭavān — seeing asi — you are mām — Me yathā — as .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nāhaṁ vedair na tapasā
na
never
aham
I
vedaiḥ
by study of the Vedas
na
never
tapasā
by serious penances
na dānena na cejyayā
na
never
dānena
by charity
na
never
ca
also
ijyayā
by worship
śakya evaṁ-vidho draṣṭuṁ
śakyaḥ
it is possible
evam - vidhaḥ
like this
draṣṭum
to see
dṛṣṭavān asi māṁ yathā
dṛṣṭavān
seeing
asi
you are
mām
Me
yathā
as .
Important Words
  • vedaiḥ — by Vedas
    Instrumental plural of veda. Not even by the Vedas themselves — the highest scriptural means is named first and ruled out as sufficient.
  • tapasā — by austerity
    Instrumental singular of tapas. Same word as 11.48; the repetition concentrates the negation.
  • dānena — by charity
    Instrumental singular of dāna. Charity, the householder's chief route to merit, ruled out.
  • ijyayā — by worship
    Instrumental singular of ijyā — 'sacrificial worship.' Yajña under another name; the verse closes the ritual category from a second angle.
  • evam - vidhaḥ — of this kind
    Adjective — 'of such-a-form.' Refers specifically to the universal form just withdrawn. The negation is precise: not this form, by these means.
  • yathā — as
    Indeclinable — 'in the way that.' Arjuna has seen 'as I am' — yathā mām. The qualifier is the verse's quiet centre: not just any sight, but sight as the Lord actually is.
The form you are seeing with your transcendental eyes cannot be understood simply by studying the Vedas, nor by undergoing serious penances, nor by charity, nor by worship. It is not by these means that one can see Me as I am.
Purport

Kṛṣṇa first appeared before His parents Devakī and Vasudeva in a four-handed form, and then He transformed Himself into the two-handed form. This mystery is very difficult to understand for those who are atheists or who are devoid of devotional service. For scholars who have simply studied Vedic literature by way of grammatical knowledge or mere academic qualifications, Kṛṣṇa is not possible to understand. Nor is He to be understood by persons who officially go to the temple to offer worship. They make their visit, but they cannot understand Kṛṣṇa as He is. Kṛṣṇa can be understood only through the path of devotional service, as explained by Kṛṣṇa Himself in the next verse.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
53. Not through the Vedas, not through austerities, not through charities, nor through performance of sacrifice, is it possible to see Me as you have seen Me.
Commentary

Moreover, please understand that others—who desire as the goal of their lives that svarūpa which is not desired by you— cannot see that form or know that form even by such practices as study of the Vedas.

Baladeva Vidyābhūṣaṇa Gauḍīya
Translation
53. Not through the Vedas, not through austerities, not through charities, nor through performance of worship, is it possible to see Me as you have seen Me.
Commentary

This form is rare to see. I, your friend with four arms, the son of Devakī, cannot be seen by anyone devoid of bhakti, by any method whatever, even by studying the Vedas, by charities, by austerities or by worship, in the way that you are seeing Me.

Bhūrijana Dāsa Gauḍīya
Commentary

All those were negative ways that one can try as much as he likes but one cannot see this form of Krsna. No matter how one tries through Vedas, austerities, etc, etc,,charity, worship, penances ‑ one can still not see this form of the Lord. Why? Because,

Study Notes — Gauranga Priya Dāsa
Gauranga Priya Dāsa Study
Bhakti-śāstrī Notes, ISKCON Chowpatty (2009)
Theme

Text 53 indirectly glorifies bhakti by using negatives. Kṛṣṇa here mentions that the paths He has dis-

cussed in Chapters One through Six will not provide us the means by which we can truly see Him

in His most confidential, two-armed form. What, then, is the method by which we can see Kṛṣṇa?

Classical Ācāryas
Śrī Śaṅkarācārya Classical
Translation
11.53 Na vedaih, not through the Vedas, not even through the four Vedas-Rk, Yajus, Sama and Atharvan; na tapasa, not by austerity, not by severe austerities like the Candrayana; not danena, by gifts, by gifts of cattle, land, gold, etc.; na ca, nor even; ijyaya, by sacrifices or worship; sakyah aham, can I; drastum, be seen evamvidhah, in this form, in the manner as was shown; yatha, as; drstavan asi, you have seen mam, Me. 'How again, can You be seen? This is being answered:
Śrī Rāmānujācārya Classical
Translation
11.53 - 11.54 Sri Krsna says By Vedas, i.e., by mere study, teaching etc., of these sacred texts, it is not possible to know Me truly. It is also not possible through meditation, sacrifices, gifts and austerities, destitute of devotion towards Me. But by single-minded devotion i.e., by devotion characterised by extreme ardour and intensity, it is possible to know Me in reality through scriptures, to behold Me directly in reality, and enter into Me in reality. So describes a Sruti passage: 'This Self cannot be obtained by instruction, nor by intellect nor by much hearing. Whomsoever He chooses, by him alone is He obtained. To such a one He reveals His own form' (Ka. U., 2.2.23) and (Mun. U., 3.2.3).
Śrī Abhinavagupta Classical
Translation
11.53 Sri Abhinavagupta did not comment upon this sloka.
Swami Sivananda Classical
Translation
11.53 Neither by the Vedas nor by austerity, nor by gift, nor by sacrifice can I be seen in this form as thou hast seen Me (so easily).
Commentary

11.53 न not? अहम् I? वेदैः by the Vedas? न not? तपसा by austerity? न not? दानेन by gift? न not? च and? इज्यया by sacrifice? शक्यः (am) possible? एवंविधः like this? द्रष्टुम् to be seen? दृष्टवानसि (thou) hast seen? माम् Me? यथा as.Commentary This Cosmic Form which thou hast seen so easily cannot be obtained either by the study of the Vedas and the six modes of philosophy? nor by the practice of manifold austerities (penances)? nor by charity? nor by sacrifices of various kinds.Arjuna was indeed very fortunate in seeing the Cosmic Form.How can the Lord be seen Listen The heart must be overflowing with true devotion to Him. (Cf.XI.48)

Swami Gambhīrānanda Classical
Translation
11.53 Not through the Vedas, not by austerity, not by gifts, nor even by sacrifice can I be seen in this form as you have seen Me.
Shri Purohit Swami Classical
Translation
11.53 Not by study of the scriptures, or by austerities, not by gifts or sacrifices, is it possible to see Me as thou hast done.
Related values & verses
Related values
Tyaga (Renunciation / Letting Go)Karuna (Kindness / Compassion)Ahimsa (Non-violence / Compassion)Tapas (Austerity / Discipline)Guru Bhakti (Reverence for Teacher)Atma Nigraha (Self-control)Daksya (Resourcefulness / Skill)Maitri (Friendship / Goodwill)
Related verses
BG 11.48 BG 11.54 BG 9.2 SB 1.2.12 SB 11.14.21 SB 10.14.29 CC Madhya 22.19 CC Madhya 11.103 CC Madhya 8.308 BRS 1.2.234 Kaṭha Upaniṣad 1.2.23
Related lectures
Personal Guidance
Not by Vedas, not by penance, not by gifts, not by sacrifice — can I be seen as you have seen Me.
Practical Applications
  • Recognize that vision is by grace alone.
  • Don't bargain with Kṛṣṇa for vision.
  • Cultivate the dispositions that invite grace, not the techniques that compel it.
Reflection Questions
  • Where have I been bargaining?
  • What does invitational practice look like instead?
Analogy

A locked door cannot be opened by counting the keys in your pocket. Veda, tapas, dāna, ijyā — four good keys; none of them fits. The chapter's mounting list of insufficient means is not a critique of those practices; it is a clearing of the path for the one practice (verse 54) that does fit.

Stories
The Sages Who Did Not See

The Bhāgavatam (SB 1.2 and 1.18) repeatedly describes great sages — Bhṛgu, Vasiṣṭha, Atri — who, despite vast tapas and yajña, did not behold the highest form of the Lord until they took to the path of devotional hearing and chanting. Sūta Gosvāmī before the assembly of Naimiṣāraṇya formalises the principle: bhaktyā śravaṇa-kīrtanāt.

Kṛṣṇa's verse in 11.53 — na vedaiḥ, na tapasā, na dānena, na ijyayā — is the negative half of that same principle. The positive half is coming in verse 54: bhaktyā tu ananyayā.

📝 My note

Source: vedabase.io

← Read full Chapter 11