Bhagavad-gītā 14.21
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
-
kaiḥ liṅgaiḥ
—
by which symptoms
Liṅga — sign, distinguishing mark. Arjuna is not asking for a definition but for diagnostic signs. The verse models the right kind of question: how is this state recognized in another person? The Gītā answers with the eight-verse description starting at 22.
-
atītaḥ
—
having transcended
Past participle of ati-i (cf. v. 20). Arjuna picks up the same verb Kṛṣṇa just used. Good listening: the disciple's question uses the master's word, ensuring no slippage of subject.
-
ācāraḥ
—
behavior, conduct
Ā-car — to move around, to conduct. Ācāra is lived behavior, not internal state. Arjuna wants behavioral signs, not psychological self-reports. A practical question — and Kṛṣṇa will answer behaviorally.
-
ativartate
—
he transcends
Present tense — how does one cross over? Arjuna's third question moves from recognition (1st) and behavior (2nd) to method (3rd). The structure of the question forces Kṛṣṇa to give signs, behavior, and method — and the rest of the chapter does exactly that.
In this verse, Arjuna’s questions are very appropriate. He wants to know the symptoms of a person who has already transcended the material modes. He first inquires of the symptoms of such a transcendental person. How can one understand that he has already transcended the influence of the modes of material nature? The second question asks how he lives and what his activities are. Are they regulated or nonregulated? Then Arjuna inquires of the means by which he can attain the transcendental nature. That is very important. Unless one knows the direct means by which one can be situated always transcendentally, there is no possibility of showing the symptoms. So all these questions put by Arjuna are very important, and the Lord answers them.
This is the same question asked in chapter two: sthita-prajṣasya kā bhāsā (please describe the sthita-prajṣa). However, out of extreme desire to know, Arjuna asks again. One question is “By what symptoms should one understand a person is beyond the guṇas?” (kair liṅgaiḥ) The second question is “What is his behavior?” (kim ācāraḥ) The third question is “What is the means of attaining transcendence of the guṇas?” (katham ca etān) When Arjuna asked his question in chapter two, he did not ask how a person could transcend the guṇas. But now he asks this question also. That is the difference.
Kṛṣṇa answers the question “What are the symptoms of one who is beyond the guṇas?” Illumination (prakāśaḥ) is the effect of sattva guṇa, as mentioned previously in the verse sarva dvāreṣu dehe’ smin prakāśa upajayate. Absorption in various projects (pravṛtti) is the effect of rajo guṇa. Absorption in the false (moha) is the effect of tamo guṇa. These three words are representative of all the other qualities (mentioned previously) of the respective guṇas. He who does not lament when all these effects of the guṇas, illumination, absorption in activities and absorption in falsity appears suddenly, nor rejoice when the effects of the guṇas disappear, is said to beyond the guṇas. The last phrase of verse 25, sa guṇātīta ucyate is understood to apply to all the verses preceding. Using the neuter gender in the word sampravṛttāni is poetic license.
Kṛṣṇa answers the second question, about the conduct of the person beyond the guṇas, in verses 23-25. He who is not disturbed by the effects of the guṇas (guṇaiḥ), in the form of happiness and distress, who does not move from his svarūpa as ātmā (guṇaiḥ na vicālyate), who remains silent (avatiṣṭhati), knowing “The guṇas alone are giving these effects; I have no relationship with this happiness and distress,” (guṇa vartante iti evam), who does not strive for bodily needs (na iṅgate), is said to be beyond the guṇas. Avatiṣṭhati is used for avatiṣṭhate as poetic license.
On seeing such symptoms and conduct of the person beyond the guṇas, one should describe that person as being beyond the guṇas. One who merely talks about the possibility of being beyond the guṇas is not said to be beyond the guṇas.
Arjuna asks about the characteristics and conduct of one who is beyond the guṇas and the practice to reach that stage. The first question is “By what symptoms can I know I am beyond the guṇas?” The second question is “What is his conduct? Does he do actions by free will or according to regulation?” The third question is “By which practice will a person surpass the guṇas?” Bg 14.22, Bg 14.23, Bg 14.24, Bg 14.25, Bg 14.22-25 ī[q>aGavaNauvac ) Pa[k-aXa& c Pa[v*ita& c MaaehMaev c Paa<@v ) Na Ūeií SaMPa[v*taaiNa Na iNav*taaiNa k-ax(+aiTa )) 22 )) odaSaqNavdaSaqNaae Gau<aEYaaeR Na ivcaLYaTae ) Gau<aa vTaRNTa wTYaev& Yaae_viTaṣiTa Nae(r)Tae )) 23 )) SaMadu"%Sau%" SvSQa" SaMal/aeíaXMak-aĀNa" ) TauLYaiPa[YaaiPa[Yaae DaqrSTauLYaiNaNdaTMaSa&STauiTa" )) 24 )) MaaNaaPaMaaNaYaaeSTauLYaSTauLYaae iMa}aairPa+aYaae" ) SavaRrM>aPairTYaaGaq Gau<aaTaqTa" Sa oCYaTae )) 25 )) śrī-bhagavān uvāca prakāśaṁ ca pravṛttiṁ ca moham eva ca pāṇḍava na dveṣṭi sampravṛttāni na nivṛttāni kāṅkṣati udāsīna-vad āsīno guṇair yo na vicālyate guṇā vartanta ity evaṁ yo 'vatiṣṭhati neṅgate sama-duḥkha-sukhaḥ sva-sthaḥ sama-loṣṭāśma-kāṣcanaḥ tulya-priyāpriyo dhīras tulya-nindātma-saṁstutiḥ mānāpamānayos tulyas tulyo mitrāri-pakṣayoḥ sarvārambha-parityāgī guṇātītaḥ sa ucyate śrī-bhagavān uvāca—the Supreme Personality of Godhead said; prakāśam—illumination; ca—and; pravṛttim—attachment; ca—and; moham—illusion; eva ca—also; pāṇḍava—O son of Pāṇḍu; na dveṣṭi—does not hate; sampravṛttāni—although developed; na nivṛttāni—nor stopping development; kāṅkṣati—desires; udāsīna-vat—as if neutral; āsīnaḥ—situated; guṇaiḥ—by the qualities; yaḥ—one who; na—never; vicālyate—is agitated; guṇāḥ—the qualities; vartante—are acting; iti evam—knowing thus; yaḥ—one who; avatiṣṭhati—remains; na—never; iṅgate—flickers; sama—equal; duḥkha—in distress; sukhaḥ—and happiness; sva-sthaḥ—being situated in himself; sama—equally; loṣṭa—a lump of earth; aśma—stone; kāṣcanaḥ—gold; tulya—equally disposed; priya—to the dear; apriyaḥ—and the undesirable; dhīraḥ—steady; tulya—equal; nindā—in defamation; ātma-saṁstutiḥ—and praise of himself; māna—in honor; apamānayoḥ—and dishonor; tulyaḥ—equal; tulyaḥ—equal; mitra—of friends; ari—and enemies; pakṣayoḥ—to the parties; sarva—of all; ārambha—endeavors; parityāgī—renouncer; guṇa-atītaḥ—transcendental to the material modes of nature; saḥ—he; ucyate—is said to be.
Even though when Arjuna asked about the symptoms of the sthita prajṣa, the Lord answered (starting with BG 2.54), because Arjuna asks about this in a particular way again, Kṛṣṇa describes the characteristics in a different way. The questions are answered in five verses. The characteristics to be recognized within onself are mentioned in the first verse. He who does not hate the appearance of knowledge (the effect of sattva), action (the effect of rajas) or illusion (the effect of tamas), thinking that they will cause suffering by transforming into their respective effects, and who does not desire their disappearance along with their products, thinking that will cause happiness, such a person beyond hatred and attachment is called a person beyond the guṇas. The conclusion of the sentence comes in verse25: guṇātītaḥ sa ucyate. The presence or absence of hatred or attachment cannot be known to others, but to oneself. This is the internal quality of the person beyond the modes.
The second question “What is his conduct?” is answered by describing the external characteristics recognized by others, in three verses. He is neutral. Just as a neutral person does not move from his middle position when two parties are quarrelling, he is not moved by the guṇas transformed with states of happiness and suffering situated in the mind. The guṇas are acting (vartante) in producing their effects such as revelation of sattva guṇa. He remains silent, convinced that he has no relation with the guṇas. He does not act according to the effects of the guṇas (na iṅgate). Such a person is beyond the guṇas.
(Two verses continue to describe the external conduct.) Because he is fixed in his svarūpa (sva sthaḥ), he is equal in happiness and distress, since he knows that those are not part of the ātmā. Because of recognizing them as inferior things, he considers earth, stone and gold the same. He considers objects which yield happiness and distress (priyāpriye) as equal to a lump of earth. He is expert at seeing the difference between jīva and prakṛti (dhiraḥ). He is equal in criticism or praise of himself, because those faults or good qualities which are causes of criticism or praise are not constitutional to the ātmā. Such a person is beyond the guṇas 25. This verse clarifies the previous verse. Criticism and praise are accomplished by words, whereas respect and disrespect (māna apamāna) are accomplished by someone else’s body or mind. He gives up all undertakings (sarvārambha parityāgī), other than those essential for supporting the material body. A person with the conduct mentioned from verse 23 to 25 can be understood by others to be beyond the guṇas. He should be understood to be actually beyond the guṇas, rather than one who talks a lot about conclusions (but does not act.)
Śrīla Baladeva Vidyābhūṣaṇa expands and rephrases the meanings of Arjuna’s questions. Arjuna first
asks what symptoms of transcendence will manifest in a person no longer affected by the modes.
The question rephrased is, “How do we understand that someone has already transcended?” The
second question—“What is his behavior?”—means, “Is his behavior regulated or enacted according
to his own desire?” The third question asks: “By what practices does he achieve transcendence?”
Bhagavad Gita Notes
14.21 कैः by what? लिंगैः by marks? त्रीन् three? गुणान् Gunas? एतान् these? अतीतः crossed? भवति becomes? प्रभो O Lord? किमाचारः what (is his) conduct? कथम् how? च and? एतान् these? त्रीन् three? गुणान् Gunas? अतिवर्तते goes beyond.Commentary Arjuna said O Lord? by what characteristics may a man be recognised as having gone beyond the three alities What is the behaviour of that Trigunatita sage (one who has gone beyond the three alities) and how does he go beyond the world and is above the Gunas Tell me that.These are the characteristics of the sage who has gone beyond the Gunas others should cultivate them.Just as a king is able to remove the grievances and sorrows of his servants? so also the Lord is able to remove the sorrows of His devotees. That is the reason why Arjuna addresses Sri Krishna as Lord and uses the term Prabhu. By using this word? Arjuna hinted to the Lord that He alone was capable of relieving his sorrows and pains. (Cf.II.54)
- BG 14 21-25 - Srinivas Acharya Prabhu - ISKCON Chowpatty 2009-12-26
- BG 14 21-27 - Radhika Raman Prabhu - Boise Temple 2005-01-07
- BG 14 21 - Bhakti Vigna Vinasa Narasimha Swami
- BG 14 21 - Kadamba Kanana Swami - South Africa 2013-07-21
- BG 14 21 - Trivikrama Swami - 2004-07-17 Russian Translation
- Priya Valabha Mataji BG 14-21 Hindi
- Jitamitra Pr Hindi Comments - BG 14-21 - 2015-09-22 EOK
- RRP BG 14-21-27 - 2005-01-07 Boise Temple
- Rasika Govinda Pr BG 14-21 Tamil - 2018-02-24
- Shubha Krishna Pr BG 14-21-25 Hindi
- BVVNarsimhaS BG 14-21
- CMS BG 14-21 - 2016-04-14 ISKCON Slovenia
- KKS BG 14-21 - Sunday Feast Lecture - 2013-07-21 Cape Town South Africa
- PrahladAnS BG 14-21 - Qualities of Transcendence - 2023-01-02 ISKCON Slovenia
- Romapada Sw BG 14-21-26 - Kirtan-Qualities of a Transcendentalist - 1987-02
- 2017-08-04 BG 14-21 - Bhuvaneshvar Pr ISKCON Vrindavan
- Welcome the practical question: how to recognize the goal-state.
- Don't just collect descriptions; ask for symptoms and behavior.
- Bring this question to your guide.
- What symptoms of transcendence have I noticed in seasoned devotees?
- What symptoms in myself, even fleetingly?
A traveler who has been told a city exists asks for three things: how to recognize a citizen, how a citizen behaves, and which road actually goes there. Arjuna is asking the right three questions about the city of transcendence.
My note
Source: vedabase.io