FolioCorpusBhagavad-gītā

Bhagavad-gītā 14.21

అర్జున ఉవాచ కైర్లిఙ్గైస్త్రీన్గుణానేతానతీతో భవతి ప్రభో । కిమాచార: కథం చైతాంస్త్రీన్గుణానతివర్తతే ॥ ౨౧ ॥
arjuna uvāca
[arjuna uvaacha]
kair liṅgais trīn guṇān etān
[kair lingais treen gunaan etaan]
atīto bhavati prabho
[ateeto bhavati prabho]
kim-ācāraḥ kathaṁ caitāṁs
[kim-aachaarah katham chaitaams]
trīn guṇān ativartate
[treen gunaan ativartate]
arjunaḥ uvāca — Arjuna said kaiḥ — by which liṅgaiḥ — symptoms trīn — three guṇān — qualities etān — all these atītaḥ — having transcended bhavati — is prabho — O my Lord kim — what ācāraḥ — behavior katham — how ca — also etān — these trīn — three guṇān — qualities ativartate — transcends .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
arjuna uvāca
arjunaḥ uvāca
Arjuna said
kair liṅgais trīn guṇān etān
kaiḥ
by which
liṅgaiḥ
symptoms
trīn
three
guṇān
qualities
etān
all these
atīto bhavati prabho
atītaḥ
having transcended
bhavati
is
prabho
O my Lord
kim-ācāraḥ kathaṁ caitāṁs
kim
what
ācāraḥ
behavior
katham
how
ca
also
etān
these
trīn guṇān ativartate
trīn
three
guṇān
qualities
ativartate
transcends .
  • kaiḥ liṅgaiḥ — by which symptoms
    Liṅga — sign, distinguishing mark. Arjuna is not asking for a definition but for diagnostic signs. The verse models the right kind of question: how is this state recognized in another person? The Gītā answers with the eight-verse description starting at 22.
  • atītaḥ — having transcended
    Past participle of ati-i (cf. v. 20). Arjuna picks up the same verb Kṛṣṇa just used. Good listening: the disciple's question uses the master's word, ensuring no slippage of subject.
  • ācāraḥ — behavior, conduct
    Ā-car — to move around, to conduct. Ācāra is lived behavior, not internal state. Arjuna wants behavioral signs, not psychological self-reports. A practical question — and Kṛṣṇa will answer behaviorally.
  • ativartate — he transcends
    Present tense — how does one cross over? Arjuna's third question moves from recognition (1st) and behavior (2nd) to method (3rd). The structure of the question forces Kṛṣṇa to give signs, behavior, and method — and the rest of the chapter does exactly that.
Arjuna inquired: O my dear Lord, by which symptoms is one known who is transcendental to these three modes? What is his behavior? And how does he transcend the modes of nature?

In this verse, Arjuna’s questions are very appropriate. He wants to know the symptoms of a person who has already transcended the material modes. He first inquires of the symptoms of such a transcendental person. How can one understand that he has already transcended the influence of the modes of material nature? The second question asks how he lives and what his activities are. Are they regulated or nonregulated? Then Arjuna inquires of the means by which he can attain the transcendental nature. That is very important. Unless one knows the direct means by which one can be situated always transcendentally, there is no possibility of showing the symptoms. So all these questions put by Arjuna are very important, and the Lord answers them.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
21. O Lord, by what symptoms is a person known to be beyond the guṇas. What is his conduct? How does he surpass the guṇas? 22. One who is beyond the guṇas does not lament at the appearance of illumination, activity or confusion, nor rejoice at their disappearance. 23. One who remains unmoved by the guṇas, who is situated indifferently, who remains without action, understanding that only the guṇas are acting, is said to have surpassed the guṇas. 24-25. He who is firmly situated, who is equal in sorrow and joy, who sees a lump of earth, a stone and gold as the same, who regards dear and not dear as the same, who regards criticism and praise as the same, who remains equal in respect or disrespect, who is equal to friend and foe, who has given up all undertakings, is said to be beyond the guṇas.
Commentary

This is the same question asked in chapter two: sthita-prajṣasya kā bhāsā (please describe the sthita-prajṣa). However, out of extreme desire to know, Arjuna asks again. One question is “By what symptoms should one understand a person is beyond the guṇas?” (kair liṅgaiḥ) The second question is “What is his behavior?” (kim ācāraḥ) The third question is “What is the means of attaining transcendence of the guṇas?” (katham ca etān) When Arjuna asked his question in chapter two, he did not ask how a person could transcend the guṇas. But now he asks this question also. That is the difference.

Kṛṣṇa answers the question “What are the symptoms of one who is beyond the guṇas?” Illumination (prakāśaḥ) is the effect of sattva guṇa, as mentioned previously in the verse sarva dvāreṣu dehe’ smin prakāśa upajayate. Absorption in various projects (pravṛtti) is the effect of rajo guṇa. Absorption in the false (moha) is the effect of tamo guṇa. These three words are representative of all the other qualities (mentioned previously) of the respective guṇas. He who does not lament when all these effects of the guṇas, illumination, absorption in activities and absorption in falsity appears suddenly, nor rejoice when the effects of the guṇas disappear, is said to beyond the guṇas. The last phrase of verse 25, sa guṇātīta ucyate is understood to apply to all the verses preceding. Using the neuter gender in the word sampravṛttāni is poetic license.

Kṛṣṇa answers the second question, about the conduct of the person beyond the guṇas, in verses 23-25. He who is not disturbed by the effects of the guṇas (guṇaiḥ), in the form of happiness and distress, who does not move from his svarūpa as ātmā (guṇaiḥ na vicālyate), who remains silent (avatiṣṭhati), knowing “The guṇas alone are giving these effects; I have no relationship with this happiness and distress,” (guṇa vartante iti evam), who does not strive for bodily needs (na iṅgate), is said to be beyond the guṇas. Avatiṣṭhati is used for avatiṣṭhate as poetic license.

On seeing such symptoms and conduct of the person beyond the guṇas, one should describe that person as being beyond the guṇas. One who merely talks about the possibility of being beyond the guṇas is not said to be beyond the guṇas.

Baladeva Vidyābhūṣaṇa Gauḍīya
Translation
21. O Lord, by what symptoms is a person known to be beyond the guṇas? What is his conduct? How does he surpass the guṇas? 22. The Lord said: One who is beyond the guṇas does not lament the appearance of illumination, activity or confusion, nor rejoice at their disappearance. 23. One who remains situated neutrally, who remains undisturbed, understanding that only the guṇas are acting, and does not act according to the effects of the guṇas, is said to have surpassed the guṇas. 24. He who is fixed in his svarūpa, is equal in sorrow and joy, who sees a lump of earth, a stone and gold as the same, who regards causes of happiness and distress as the same, who sees the difference between ātmā and prakṛti, who regards criticism and praise of himself as the same, is said to be beyond the guṇas. 25. One who remains equal in respect or disrespect, who is equal to friend and foe, who has given up all extraneous undertakings, is said to be beyond the guṇas.
Commentary

Arjuna asks about the characteristics and conduct of one who is beyond the guṇas and the practice to reach that stage. The first question is “By what symptoms can I know I am beyond the guṇas?” The second question is “What is his conduct? Does he do actions by free will or according to regulation?” The third question is “By which practice will a person surpass the guṇas?” Bg 14.22, Bg 14.23, Bg 14.24, Bg 14.25, Bg 14.22-25 ī[q>aGavaNauvac ) Pa[k-aXa& c Pa[v*ita& c MaaehMaev c Paa<@v ) Na Ūeií SaMPa[v*taaiNa Na iNav*taaiNa k-ax(+aiTa )) 22 )) odaSaqNavdaSaqNaae Gau<aEYaaeR Na ivcaLYaTae ) Gau<aa vTaRNTa wTYaev& Yaae_viTaṣiTa Nae(r)Tae )) 23 )) SaMadu"%Sau%" SvSQa" SaMal/aeíaXMak-aĀNa" ) TauLYaiPa[YaaiPa[Yaae DaqrSTauLYaiNaNdaTMaSa&STauiTa" )) 24 )) MaaNaaPaMaaNaYaaeSTauLYaSTauLYaae iMa}aairPa+aYaae" ) SavaRrM>aPairTYaaGaq Gau<aaTaqTa" Sa oCYaTae )) 25 )) śrī-bhagavān uvāca prakāśaṁ ca pravṛttiṁ ca moham eva ca pāṇḍava na dveṣṭi sampravṛttāni na nivṛttāni kāṅkṣati udāsīna-vad āsīno guṇair yo na vicālyate guṇā vartanta ity evaṁ yo 'vatiṣṭhati neṅgate sama-duḥkha-sukhaḥ sva-sthaḥ sama-loṣṭāśma-kāṣcanaḥ tulya-priyāpriyo dhīras tulya-nindātma-saṁstutiḥ mānāpamānayos tulyas tulyo mitrāri-pakṣayoḥ sarvārambha-parityāgī guṇātītaḥ sa ucyate śrī-bhagavān uvāca—the Supreme Personality of Godhead said; prakāśam—illumination; ca—and; pravṛttim—attachment; ca—and; moham—illusion; eva ca—also; pāṇḍava—O son of Pāṇḍu; na dveṣṭi—does not hate; sampravṛttāni—although developed; na nivṛttāni—nor stopping development; kāṅkṣati—desires; udāsīna-vat—as if neutral; āsīnaḥ—situated; guṇaiḥ—by the qualities; yaḥ—one who; na—never; vicālyate—is agitated; guṇāḥ—the qualities; vartante—are acting; iti evam—knowing thus; yaḥ—one who; avatiṣṭhati—remains; na—never; iṅgate—flickers; sama—equal; duḥkha—in distress; sukhaḥ—and happiness; sva-sthaḥ—being situated in himself; sama—equally; loṣṭa—a lump of earth; aśma—stone; kāṣcanaḥ—gold; tulya—equally disposed; priya—to the dear; apriyaḥ—and the undesirable; dhīraḥ—steady; tulya—equal; nindā—in defamation; ātma-saṁstutiḥ—and praise of himself; māna—in honor; apamānayoḥ—and dishonor; tulyaḥ—equal; tulyaḥ—equal; mitra—of friends; ari—and enemies; pakṣayoḥ—to the parties; sarva—of all; ārambha—endeavors; parityāgī—renouncer; guṇa-atītaḥ—transcendental to the material modes of nature; saḥ—he; ucyate—is said to be.

Even though when Arjuna asked about the symptoms of the sthita prajṣa, the Lord answered (starting with BG 2.54), because Arjuna asks about this in a particular way again, Kṛṣṇa describes the characteristics in a different way. The questions are answered in five verses. The characteristics to be recognized within onself are mentioned in the first verse. He who does not hate the appearance of knowledge (the effect of sattva), action (the effect of rajas) or illusion (the effect of tamas), thinking that they will cause suffering by transforming into their respective effects, and who does not desire their disappearance along with their products, thinking that will cause happiness, such a person beyond hatred and attachment is called a person beyond the guṇas. The conclusion of the sentence comes in verse25: guṇātītaḥ sa ucyate. The presence or absence of hatred or attachment cannot be known to others, but to oneself. This is the internal quality of the person beyond the modes.

The second question “What is his conduct?” is answered by describing the external characteristics recognized by others, in three verses. He is neutral. Just as a neutral person does not move from his middle position when two parties are quarrelling, he is not moved by the guṇas transformed with states of happiness and suffering situated in the mind. The guṇas are acting (vartante) in producing their effects such as revelation of sattva guṇa. He remains silent, convinced that he has no relation with the guṇas. He does not act according to the effects of the guṇas (na iṅgate). Such a person is beyond the guṇas.

(Two verses continue to describe the external conduct.) Because he is fixed in his svarūpa (sva sthaḥ), he is equal in happiness and distress, since he knows that those are not part of the ātmā. Because of recognizing them as inferior things, he considers earth, stone and gold the same. He considers objects which yield happiness and distress (priyāpriye) as equal to a lump of earth. He is expert at seeing the difference between jīva and prakṛti (dhiraḥ). He is equal in criticism or praise of himself, because those faults or good qualities which are causes of criticism or praise are not constitutional to the ātmā. Such a person is beyond the guṇas 25. This verse clarifies the previous verse. Criticism and praise are accomplished by words, whereas respect and disrespect (māna apamāna) are accomplished by someone else’s body or mind. He gives up all undertakings (sarvārambha parityāgī), other than those essential for supporting the material body. A person with the conduct mentioned from verse 23 to 25 can be understood by others to be beyond the guṇas. He should be understood to be actually beyond the guṇas, rather than one who talks a lot about conclusions (but does not act.)

Gauranga Priya Dāsa Study
Bhakti-śāstrī Notes, ISKCON Chowpatty (2009)
Theme

Śrīla Baladeva Vidyābhūṣaṇa expands and rephrases the meanings of Arjuna’s questions. Arjuna first

asks what symptoms of transcendence will manifest in a person no longer affected by the modes.

The question rephrased is, “How do we understand that someone has already transcended?” The

second question—“What is his behavior?”—means, “Is his behavior regulated or enacted according

to his own desire?” The third question asks: “By what practices does he achieve transcendence?”

Bhagavad Gita Notes

Śrī Śaṅkarācārya Classical
Translation
14.21 Prabho, O Lord; kaih, by what; lingaih, signs; bhavati, is one (known); atitah, who has gone beyond; etan, these; trin, three; gunan, alities that have been explained? Kim, what; is his acarah, behaviour; ca, and; katham, how, in what way; ativartate, does he transcend; [Ast. adds here, 'atitya vartate, (in what way) does he exist after transcending (the three alities)?'-Tr.] etan, these; trin, three; gunan, alities? In this verse the signs of one who has gone beyond the alities, and the means of transcending them have been asked by Arjuna. By way of replying to the two estions, the Lord said: 'As for the estion, 'With what sings does one who has gone beyond the alities become endowed with?", listen to them:'
Śrī Rāmānujācārya Classical
Translation
14.21 Arjuna said By what signs, namely, distinguishing features, is a man who has crossed beyond these three Gunas, Sattva and the rest, characterised? What is his behaviour? With what kind of behaviour is he associated and how does it serve as a sign for knowing his state? Such is the meaning. How does he, i.e., by what means does he cross beyond the three Gunas, the Sattva and the rest?
Śrī Abhinavagupta Classical
Translation
14.21 Kaih etc. But, if he has a body then how could he have transcended the Strands ? He lives certainly in one way or other with some mental modification, which is necessarily one a among the three Strands, With this intention Arjuna raises the estion. Now [by way of giving] answer -
Swami Sivananda Classical
Translation
14.21 Arjuna said What are the marks of him who has transcended the three alities, O Lord? What is his conduct and how does he go beyond these three alities?
Commentary

14.21 कैः by what? लिंगैः by marks? त्रीन् three? गुणान् Gunas? एतान् these? अतीतः crossed? भवति becomes? प्रभो O Lord? किमाचारः what (is his) conduct? कथम् how? च and? एतान् these? त्रीन् three? गुणान् Gunas? अतिवर्तते goes beyond.Commentary Arjuna said O Lord? by what characteristics may a man be recognised as having gone beyond the three alities What is the behaviour of that Trigunatita sage (one who has gone beyond the three alities) and how does he go beyond the world and is above the Gunas Tell me that.These are the characteristics of the sage who has gone beyond the Gunas others should cultivate them.Just as a king is able to remove the grievances and sorrows of his servants? so also the Lord is able to remove the sorrows of His devotees. That is the reason why Arjuna addresses Sri Krishna as Lord and uses the term Prabhu. By using this word? Arjuna hinted to the Lord that He alone was capable of relieving his sorrows and pains. (Cf.II.54)

Swami Gambhīrānanda Classical
Translation
14.21 Arjuna said O Lord, by what signs is one (known) who has gone beyond these three alities? What is his behaviour, and how does he transcend these three alities?
Shri Purohit Swami Classical
Translation
14.21 Arjuna asked: My Lord! By what signs can he who has transcended the Qualities be recognized? How does he act? How does he live beyond them?
Related values
Tyaga (Renunciation / Letting Go)Karuna (Kindness / Compassion)Tapas (Austerity / Discipline)Atma Nigraha (Self-control)Daksya (Resourcefulness / Skill)Abhaya (Fearlessness)
Related verses
Arjuna asks: by what symptoms is the soul transcendental to the modes known? How does he behave? How does he transcend?
Practical Applications
  • Welcome the practical question: how to recognize the goal-state.
  • Don't just collect descriptions; ask for symptoms and behavior.
  • Bring this question to your guide.
Reflection Questions
  • What symptoms of transcendence have I noticed in seasoned devotees?
  • What symptoms in myself, even fleetingly?

A traveler who has been told a city exists asks for three things: how to recognize a citizen, how a citizen behaves, and which road actually goes there. Arjuna is asking the right three questions about the city of transcendence.

📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 14