Bhagavad-gītā 17.20
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
-
dātavyam
—
worth giving
Future passive participle of √dā — 'that which is to be given.' Charity performed because the gift simply is-to-be-given — the same yaṣṭavyam logic from 17.11 transposed from yajña to dāna. Duty, not transaction.
-
anupakāriṇe
—
irrespective of return
Compound: an- (not) + upakāra (returning a favour) + -in (suffix making 'one who'). Dative case: 'to one who will not return the favour.' The verse insists not just on the giver's intent but on the actual structure of the gift — to one from whom no return is possible.
-
deśe
—
in a proper place
Locative of deśa — place. Paired in the verse with kāle (proper time). Sattvic charity has external coordinates: when and where matter. The Gītā here is anti-romantic about charity — the hand, time, and place all count, not just the heart.
-
kāle
—
at a proper time
Locative of kāla. The companion of deśe. Note that 17.22 reuses kāle inverted — adeśe-kāle — to mark tamasic charity. The same locative, the same time-and-place criterion, runs through all three modes of giving.
-
pātre
—
to a suitable person
Locative of pātra — literally 'a vessel.' The receiver must be a fit container for what is given. Charity to an unworthy receiver becomes tamasic (verse 22), no matter how sincere the giver. The vessel-metaphor is precise: pour amṛta into a cracked pot and it leaks.
-
smṛtam
—
is considered
Past participle of √smṛ — to remember, to record. Used as a passive verbal: 'is recorded in tradition as.' Kṛṣṇa is invoking the smṛti literature's authority — He is not making a new rule but confirming what the tradition has long held.
In the Vedic literature, charity given to a person engaged in spiritual activities is recommended. There is no recommendation for giving charity indiscriminately. Spiritual perfection is always a consideration. Therefore charity is recommended to be given at a place of pilgrimage and at lunar or solar eclipses or at the end of the month or to a qualified brāhmaṇa or a Vaiṣṇava (devotee) or in temples. Such charities should be given without any consideration of return. Charity to the poor is sometimes given out of compassion, but if a poor man is not worth giving charity to, then there is no spiritual advancement. In other words, indiscriminate charity is not recommended in the Vedic literature.
One should be convinced that the gift should be given (dātavam iti). It is understood here that there is no desire for personal gain.
Three types of charity are described. That charity which is given with conviction that it should be given (dātavyam) to a recipient (pātre) such as brāhmaṇa who can protect the giver with his knowledge and austerity, [Note: Scripture (Garuḍa Purāṇa) says that only a person who can protect the giver by learning and austerity should accept gifts.] is charity in the mode of goodness. Anupakāriṇe means to give to a person without expecting repayment or reimbursement. Proper place means at a holy place and proper time means auspicious times such as the time when the sun moves into a new zodiac sign.
Charity in goodness
17.20 दातव्यम् ought to be given? इति thus? यत् that? दानम् gift? दीयते is given? अनुपकारिणे to one who does no service (in return)? देशे in a fit place? काले in time? च and? पात्रे to a worthy person? च and? तत् that? दानम् gift? सात्त्विकम् Sattvic? स्मृतम् is held to be.Commentary The gift should be given to one who cannot return the good or to one from whom no such return is expected.It is necessary to be in Kurukshetra or Varanasi or any part of the world that is eally sacred when one offes gifts. The time should be during solar or lunar eclips or an eally auspicious occasion.Worthy A pious person who is a Tapasvin? who is well versed in the scriptures (the Vedas and the,Vedangas)? who is able to protect himself and the donor? etc.At such a time and such a place there shoule be a person worthy to receive the gift? a person who is the very incarnation of purity? the very abode of good conduct. A gift may be freely given to such a highly deserving person. The donor should not boast of his charity.
- BG 17 20-21 - Vidagdha Madhava Prabhu - ISKCON Chowpatty 2010-02-15
- BG 17 20-22 - Jai Baladeva Prabhu - ISKCON Chowpatty 2010-03-02
- BG 17 20-22 - Kancana Valli Mataji - ISKCON Radhadesh 2011-06-27
- BG 17 20-28 - Chaitanya Charan Prabhu - Pune 2013-05-05.MP3
- BG 17 20 - Radhanath Swami - 1998-08-08
- BG 17 20 - Sankarsana Prabhu - Riga Latvia 2005-09-22
- Priya Valabha Mataji BG 17-20-22 Hindi
- Chaitanya Charan Pr BG 17-20-28 - How Om Tat Sat spiritualizes Yajna Dana and Tapa - 2013-05-05 Pune
- Jitamitra Pr Hindi Comments - BG 17-20 - 2016-02-09 EOK
- Nityananda Charan Pr BG 17-20-28
- Rasika Govinda Pr BG 17-20 Tamil - 2018-04-30
- SDAP BG 17-20 - 2005-09-22 Riga Latvia
- Sarvabhauma Pr BG 17-20 Russian Translation - Rupa Goswami Disappearance Day - Ulan Ude Russia
- Sarvabhauma Pr BG 17-20 Russian Translation - 2017-08-03 Ulan-Ude
- Sarvabhauma Pr BG 17-20 Russian Translation - Ulan Ude Russia
- Shubha Krishna Pr BG 17-20-22 Hindi
- Vaisesika Pr BG 17 - 2008-12-03
- Vaisesika Pr BG 17 - 2017-02-02
- Vaisesika Pr BG 17 - 2011-03-30
- BBGS BG 17-20-22 Russian Translation - 1995-10-05 Bishkek
- Bhakti Vikas Sw BG 17-20-22 - The Principle of Charity - 2014-05-14 London
- BKG BG Course - BG 17-20-24 - 2020-09-21 New Goloka
- PrahladAnS BG 17-20 Slovenian Translation - Pomembnost razumevanja Ved - 2023-06-22 ISKCON Slovenia
- PrahladAnS BG 17-20 - Importance of understandig Vedas - 2023-06-22 ISKCON Slovenia
- 1998 BG-17-20 The Ultimate Charity of Krishna Consciousness - Radhanath Swami 1998-08-08 IDesireTree
- Sukadeva Sw Telugu BG 17-20
- Give without expectation of return.
- Time and place matter — give thoughtfully.
- Treat charity as duty, not as performance.
- Where is my giving still expecting return?
- What duty-charity is calling me?
Sattvic charity is like rain falling on a field — not chosen by the cloud, not begged by the field, given because the cloud is full and the field is there. The rain does not stop to ask for thanks; the cloud does not check whether it will be paid back. Right time, right place, right field, no return expected.
When the small brāhmaṇa boy Vāmana asked for only three paces of land, the demon-king Bali — though warned by his guru that this was Viṣṇu Himself come to take everything — chose to give. Bali knew the gift would cost him his kingdom, his wealth, his power. He gave anyway, because the request had come at the right time, the right place, and to a worthy recipient.
When Vāmana's two strides covered the entire universe and the third step had nowhere to land, Bali offered his own head. Bhāgavatam holds him up as the supreme dānī — sāttvika-dāna so absolute that the receiver Himself became permanently the gatekeeper of the giver's door.
Born with armour and earrings that made him invincible, Karṇa had taken a vow never to refuse a brāhmaṇa's request after morning worship. When Indra came disguised to ask for the kavaca and kuṇḍala — knowing this would unmake Karṇa's invulnerability — Karṇa gave them. He gave without grudging, without asking what he would get in return, at the time and place of his vow, to one who appeared as a worthy recipient.
Mahābhārata treats this gift as the high water mark of Karṇa's sāttvika nature — the same Karṇa whose other actions ran in rajas and tamas. One act of pure sāttvika-dāna can stand as a soul's permanent ornament.
My note
Source: vedabase.io