[rasaa eva rasaabhaasaa rasa-jnair anukeertitaah ||1||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
pūrvam evānuśiṣṭena vikalā rasa-lakṣaṇā |
rasā eva rasābhāsā rasa-jñair anukīrtitāḥ ||1||
What appears to be rasa but is without the characteristics previously mentioned is called rasābhāsa by the knowers of rasa.
Purport
NoD 51: Perverted Expression of Mellows
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
The word rasa here means “that which suddenly appears to be rasa.” Vikalā means “deficient,” and vikalā rasa-lakṣaṇā means “with deficiency in the characteristics of rasa such as vibhāva, anubhāva, sthāyi-bhāva, vyabhicāri-bhāva and sāttvika-bhāvas.”
Rasābhāsas are classed as three types: uttama, madhyama and kaniṣṭha, or uparasa, anurasa and aparasa.
Purport
Rasābhāsa, or incompatible mixtures of mellows, may be classified as uparasa (false expression), anurasa (imitation) and aparasa (perverted or misrepresented mellows).
tathā bībhatsa-bhūmādeḥ śānto hy uparaso bhavet ||4||
Śāntoparasa arises from accepting the impersonal brahman feature of the Lord, from contemplating oneness of everything with the Lord, from continual disdain for the body, and from discrimination of cit and acit.
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
The para-brahma mentioned is Kṛṣṇa, who is the basis of the impersonal aspect (brahma-bhāva). This is explained in the Gītā verse brahmaṇo hi pratiṣṭḥāham: I am the basis of brahman. Thus, śāntoparasa can arise from appreciating exclusively the impersonal aspect (brahma-bhāvāt) of the Lord (para-brahmaṇi). Advaitādhikya-yogataḥ means “from considering the absolute non-difference of everything from the Lord since He is the cause of everything.” Bībhatsa-bhūmādeḥ means “from continual disgust with the body and other material factors.” Ādi indicates that śāntoparasa can also arise from absorption in discriminating cit from acit (matter and spirit). [Note: This is one of the activities of the jñānī.] From this point onwards, examples will be raised showing only some of these factors.
[vijnaana-sushamaadhaute samaadhau yad udanchati |]
sukhaṁ dṛṣṭe tad evādya purāṇa-puruṣe tvayi ||5||
[sukham drishte tad evaadya puraana-purushe tvayi ||5||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tatra ādyaṁ, yathā –
vijñāna-suṣamādhaute samādhau yad udañcati |
sukhaṁ dṛṣṭe tad evādya purāṇa-puruṣe tvayi ||5||
Accepting the impersonal brahman feature of the Lord: Seeing You, the ancient person, today, I have realized the bliss of impersonal brahman which arises in samādhi purified by the splendor of knowledge. [Note: This would be a distortion of the viṣaya aspect of vibhāva and distortion of the sthāyi-bhāva, though the examples in verses 5-17 are illustrations of irregular sthāyi-bhāvas.]
Purport
There is the following statement by an impersonalist who had just seen Kṛṣṇa: “When a person has passed completely from all contamination of material existence, he relishes a transcendental bliss of being established in trance. But as soon as I saw You, the original Personality of Godhead, I experienced the same bliss.” This perverted reflection of mellows is called śānta-uparasa, or a perverted reflection of mixed impersonalism and personalism.
Contemplating oneness: Whatever objects I see, I see as You alone, because there is nothing other than You as the cause of all causes and effect, O pure one!
Purport
There is another statement as follows: “Wherever I am glancing I simply see Your personality. Therefore I know that You are the uncontaminated Brahman effulgence, the supreme cause of all causes. I think that there is nothing but You in this cosmic manifestation.” This is another example of uparasa, or a perverted reflection of impersonalism and personalism.
Prītoparasa (dāsyoparasa) arises by showing audacity in the presence of the Lord, disrespecting His devotees, seeing the devatās as more attractive than the Lord, and ignoring the rules.
Showing audacity: After showing off his lack of bodily control and being ignored by the devotees when he danced, a fickle brāhmaṇa boy without shame addressed the deity of Kṛṣṇa in a bold voice. “O Lord! Look at me!” In this way, he showed his love for the Lord.
Purport
When Madhumaṅgala, an intimate friend of Kṛṣṇa, was dancing before Kṛṣṇa in a joking manner, no one was paying attention to him, and he jokingly said, “My dear Lord, please be merciful upon me. I am praying for Your mercy.” This is an example of uparasa in fraternal affection and neutrality.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
This person exaggerated his symptoms of lack of bodily control (vivaśatām prathayan), which were actually quite insignificant. Prabho (O lord) is an address to the deity form of the Lord.
One-sided friendship: When Kṛṣṇa addressed a king as His friend, the King replied, “I am not qualified to be Your friend.” When Kṛṣṇa joked with him, the King began to recite prayers of praise to Him. When Kṛṣṇa embraced him, the king began offering his respects on the ground.
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
“The king (sa nṛpaḥ)” refers to a father-in-law of one of Kṛṣṇa’s sons or daughters. [Note: Rukmiṇī had a daughter called Cārumatī. Śrīdhara Svāmī says that each queen of Kṛṣṇa had one daughter. SB 10.61.24]
Vatsaloparasa arises from recognizing too much power in the Lord, from making no effort to affectionately care for the Lord as child, and from excessive suffering.
Seeing too much power in the Lord: O sister! Ever since the time that I saw your son kill the wrestlers as hard as mountains, I cannot be disturbed even if He engages in extended battles.
Purport
Kaṁsa once addressed his sister Devakī as follows: “My dear sister, having seen your dear son Kṛṣṇa, I think that He is so strong that He can kill even wrestlers as strong as the mountains. So I will have no more anxieties about Him, even if He is engaged in a terrible fight.” This is an instance of uparasa in a perverted reflection of parental love.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Jāmi means “O sister!” [Note: One of the co-wives of Vasudeva speaks to Devakī in this verse.]
madhuroparasa: The sthāyi-bhāva of madhura-rasa is distorted where the love between two persons is one-sided or where one of the persons has many lovers. The distortion of the vibhāva brings about a distortion in the sthāyi-bhāva.
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Vibhāvasyaiva vairūpyam means irregularity in the ālambana (viṣaya and āśraya). There may be some distortion of either the body or the antaḥkaraṇa (internal organ). That is because there can be no real distortion of the sthāyi-bhāva by its very nature. In the example of one-sided rati, there is irregularity in the bodies of the brāhmaṇas’ wives, since their bodies are from brāhmaṇa families. This causes irregularity in the rati (being one-sided): since it is improper, it does not invoke a similar rati in Kṛṣṇa. Thus it is said that one fault brings about another fault elsewhere, by transference. One party having more than one lover indicates irregularity in the antaḥkaraṇa, since there is no dedication to one object of love. This fault would be in reference to the women who love Kṛṣṇa. Another irregularity in female lovers arises when they do not distinguish between superior and inferior male lovers.
One-sided love, from Lalita-mādhava: Though the fire of Cupid began to smolder in the brāhmaṇas’ wives, Kṛṣṇa avoided their spontaneous, sweet smiles. He hid the restless glances from His eyes. An indescribable state of peace appeared in Kṛṣṇa’s mind.
Purport
In the Lalita-mādhava, Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī says, “The wives of the yājñika brāhmaṇas were all young girls, and they were attracted to Kṛṣṇa in the same way as the gopīs of Vṛndāvana. Out of their attraction, they distributed food to Kṛṣṇa.” Here the two devotional mellows are conjugal love and parental love, and the result is called uparasa in conjugal love.
etasyāḥ prāg-abhāve tu śucir noparaso bhavet ||15||
[etasyaah praag-abhaave tu shuchir noparaso bhavet ||15||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
atyantābhāva evātra rateḥ khalu vivakṣitaḥ |
etasyāḥ prāg-abhāve tu śucir noparaso bhavet ||15||
The intention of the previous verse is also to point out the temporary nature of the wives’ rati (atyanta abhāvaḥ). However, madhuroparasa does not arise here solely because the rati did not exist previously. Though the fire of Cupid began to smolder in the brāhmaṇas’ wives, I suppressed my spontaneous, sweet smile and hid the restless glances in my eyes. An indescribable state of peace appeared in my mind.
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Atyanta abhāva rateḥ atra means that the rati of those women with brāhmaṇa bodies did not exist in all three stages of time (past, present and future).
Rati for several persons: O Rādhā! O friend! O chaste woman! Seeing Balarāma perform pastimes on this earth, and hearing the sound of Mukunda’s flute, today you have been divided into two parts by Cupid.
Purport
One of the friends of Śrīmatī Rādhārāṇī told Her, “My dear friend Gāndharvikā [Rādhārāṇī], You were the most chaste girl in our village, but now You have divided Yourself and are partially chaste and partially unchaste. It is all due to Cupid’s influence upon You after You saw Kṛṣṇa and heard the sound of His flute.” This is another example of uparasa caused by divided interests in conjugal love.
Some say that madhuroparasa arises where the male lover does not distinguish between many types of women lovers and treats them all equally.
Purport
According to some expert learned scholars, the feelings between lover and beloved create perverted reflections of mellows in many ways.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Those knowledgeable of rasa (kecit) say that madhuroparasa arises where the male lover treats all types of women with differing types of prema (nāyikāsu anekāsu) in the same way.
latā-paśu-pulindīṣu vṛddhāsv api sa vartate ||18||
[lataa-pashu-pulindeeshu vriddhaasv api sa vartate ||18||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vibhāva-vairūpyam –
vaidagdhyaujjvalya-viraho vibhāvasya virūpatā |
latā-paśu-pulindīṣu vṛddhāsv api sa vartate ||18||
There is irregularity in the vibhāva (āśrayas) where there is lack of cleverness, suitability, good dress and purity. This irregularity is present in creepers, animals, the Pulinda women and old women.
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Vaidagdhyaujjvalya-viraho (absence of cleverness and suitability) is not a complete list, being representative only, indicating the inappropriate qualities of elders and others for madhura-rati. The wives of the brāhmaṇas were considered irregular as vibhāvas for madhura-rasa because of being from superior brāhmaṇa families. The experience of bliss by the plants and creepers is only fancied to be madhura-rati. The devotees attribute madhura-rati to them, because they have very close association with the Lord. Elderly women are described as having madhura-rati just for joking. Therefore, because of the absence of actual madhura-rati, it is classed as rasābhāsa. The creepers do not have cleverness in loving affairs. The elderly women have the opposite of cleverness in loving affairs. Cleverness also does not manifest much in the Pulinda women. Thus absence of cleverness (vaidagdhya) has been singled out. Ujjvalyam refers to suitability by form or species. The absence of these qualities (sa) exists (vartate) in creepers, animals and old ladies.
Creepers: The creepers which had become soft by the glance of Kṛṣṇa are oozing honey on hearing the sound of His flute. They reveal their love for Kṛṣṇa which has sprouted in their hearts by displaying goose bumps in the form of buds sprouting on their limbs.
Purport
“The gopīs have become purified by Kṛṣṇa’s glance, and as such, Cupid’s influence is distinctly visible on their bodies.” Although in the material sense the glancing of a boy at a girl is a kind of pollution, when Kṛṣṇa threw His transcendental glance at the gopīs, they became purified. In other words, because Kṛṣṇa is the Absolute Truth, any action by Him is transcendentally pure.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
There is another version.
samukula-pulakā niśamya vaṁśīṁ nakha-likhitā ca harīm prasajya jātā
tad iha navavayāḥ pratāninīyaṁ lasati yathā bhavatī tatha vārāṅgi
In the forest, this creeper with new branches, hearing the flute, develops goose bumps with its buds. Clinging to the Lord, it has become engraved with His nails. O beautiful woman, it engages in loving affairs just as you do.
Animals: O friend! See these fortunate deer, experiencing extraordinary bliss on the bank of the Yamunā. Today, purified by the side glance of Kṛṣṇa, they are casting playful glances of conjugal love at His limbs.
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Another version of the last half of the verse is as follows:
yāḥ keśavāṅgaṁ sakhi saṅgamaya
svairād apāṅgaṁ bhavatīr jayati
Touching the limbs of Kṛṣṇa, they cast glances at Him without restraint.
Pulinda women: Look here! The Pulinda women, seeing the restless eyes of Hari on the bank of the Yamunā, are wandering about with their hairs standing on end.
Old women: Look, Rādhā! This old woman has dyed her hair black using kajjala and has raised her breasts by inserting bilva fruits in her bodice. She makes Kṛṣṇa smile as she throws amorous glances at Him.
If there is irregularity in the sthāyi-bhāva because of one-sided love, then the example will also show irregularity in the vibhāva. It was previously said that irregularity in the vibhāva will produce irregularity in the sthāyi-bhāva.
It is said that proper condition for madhura-rasa arises from purity, appropriate form and species, cleverness in love and good dress. Lack of these qualities in the vibhāva creates ābhāsa in the vibhāva of madhura-rasa.
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
The points made in verse 18 are expanded on and summarized in this verse. Purity, appropriate form and species, cleverness and good dress are qualities which must be found in the ālambana for madhura-rasa to manifest properly. Vibhāvatvam, which is analyzed as viśeṣaḥ bhāvaḥ, means “special or excellent situation.” Thus the objects and experiencers of love (vibhāva) should have these excellent qualities inherent in them. Another version of the verse is:
pāvitraujjvalyia-vaidigdhya-suveṣatvair vibhāvagaiḥ
śṛṅgāraḥ puṣtām āgacched ābhāsatvam ato ’nyathā
Madhura-rasa becomes nourished by the vibhāvas of purity, appropriate form and species, cleverness in love and proper dress. Without these conditions the madhura-rasa becomes ābhāsa.
The proper conduct for a woman who has been neglected by her lover is to show anger. The proper conduct of the man when hit by flowers thrown by his lover is to smile. For the man and woman to act otherwise is called transgression of normal conduct.
Improper conduct: O lord! Though you are marked by the nails of other women lovers, I give up all shyness, and request that you please accept me, who am Your servant residing on Mount Kailāsa.
Unsuitable words: O baby cowherd! How is it that you loosen the belts of us young snake girls living in the lake of Kāliya, by the sound of Your flute?
Purport
After Kṛṣṇa chastised the Kāliya-nāga in the Yamunā River by dancing on his heads, the Kāliya-nāga’s wives addressed Kṛṣṇa, “Dear cowherd boy, we are all only young wives of the Kāliya-nāga, so why do You agitate our minds by sounding Your flute?” Kāliya’s wives were flattering Kṛṣṇa so that He would spare their husband. Therefore this is an example of uparasa, or false expression.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
The uparasa exemplified in the young girls living in Kāliya’s lake, like the example of the girls living on Mount Kailasa in verses 27 and 31, is according to descriptions from other Purāṇas. This uparasa involving anubhāvas is caused by describing Kṛṣṇa with disrespect. Puṣkara-sadām means those girls living in the waters of Kāliya’s lake. Though young in one sense, Kṛṣṇa had assumed the stage of kaiśora age because the sound of the flute is mentioned. Thus, using the word bāla (usually referring to His baby years) to describe Kṛṣṇa is a symptom of the girls’ lack of expertise in loving affairs (lack of vaidagdhya).
prakaṭa-prārthanādiḥ syāt sambhogādes tu dhṛṣṭatā ||30||
[prakata-praarthanaadih syaat sambhogaades tu dhrishtataa ||30||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
atha dhṛṣṭatā –
prakaṭa-prārthanādiḥ syāt sambhogādes tu dhṛṣṭatā ||30||
Audacity: To request for enjoyment with Kṛṣṇa overtly is called boldness.
Purport
One devotee said, “My dear Govinda, here is a nice flowery bush in Kailāsa. I am a young girl, and You are a young poetic boy. After this, what more can I say? You just consider.” This is an example of uparasa, caused by impudence in conjugal love.
O my lover! O Govinda! Living in bower on Mount Kailāsa, I am of the late kaiśora age and attractive, and You are clever in love affairs. What more can be said?
If the devotees as ālambanas and other elements are devoid of a relationship with Kṛṣṇa when expressing a certain rasa, then anurasa arises for the seven secondary rasas and śānta-rasa. [Note: Anurasa will not arise in the primary rasas other than śānta, because those rasas are directly related to Kṛṣṇa.]
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Bhaktādibhiḥ (by devotees etc.) means devotees of the five types (śānta, dāsya, sakhya, vatsala and madhura). Other scriptures on rasa consider śānta to be unsuitable for this list. [Note: Thus the four types of devotees are indicated by the word bhakta and the śānta-bhakta is indicated by ādi.]
Hearing the prolonged debate among the parrots on Vedānta in creepers climbing the Bhāṇdira tree, Nārada eyes stopped blinking in wonder, and his hairs stood on end.
Purport
When Nārada Muni was passing through Vṛndāvana, he came to the Bhāṇḍīravana forest and saw in one of the trees the famous parrot couple that always accompanies Lord Kṛṣṇa. The couple was imitating some discussion they had heard upon the Vedānta philosophy, and thus were seemingly arguing upon various philosophical points. Upon seeing this, Nārada Muni was struck with wonder, and he began to stare without moving his eyelids. This is an example of anurasa, or imitation.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Bhāṇḍīra-kakṣe means “in the tall creepers climbing up the Bhāṇḍira tree.” Viśva-kośa says saurabhye ca tṛne kaksaḥ śuṣka-kānanavīrudhor: kakṣa means fragrant grass, grass in general, a dry forest or a creeper. Another version has bhāṇḍīra-vṛkṣe which is easily understood.
If the seven secondary rasas or śānta-rasa appear in neutral devotees [Note: Taṭastha-bhaktas are described as those who are attached to the brahman (śānta rasa) and those who appreciate the qualities of the Lord but do not identify themselves as His followers. (Prīti-sandarbha 92) The taṭastha-bhakta’s experience of Kṛṣṇa is inferior to the śānta-bhakta with uparasa as a temporary phenomena, and is thus classed as anurasa.] with Kṛṣṇa as the vibhāva etc. it is still considered anurasa.
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
Aśṭau means śānta-rasa and the seven secondary rasas.
hāsādīnāṁ tadā te ’tra prājñair aparasā matāḥ ||38||
[haasaadeenaam tadaa te ’tra praajnair aparasaa mataah ||38||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
atha aparasāḥ –
kṛṣṇa-tat-pratipakṣaś ced viṣayāśrayatāṁ gatāḥ |
hāsādīnāṁ tadā te ’tra prājñair aparasā matāḥ ||38||
If Kṛṣṇa becomes the viṣaya and His enemies become the āśraya of hāsya and other secondary rasas, [Note: The enemies of Kṛṣṇa can not be the āśraya for the primary rasas, because they would no longer be enemies.] it is called aparasa by the wise.
Seeing from far off restless-eyed Kṛṣṇa fleeing, Jarāsandha began to laugh repeatedly.
Purport
When Kṛṣṇa was fleeing from the battlefield, from a distant place Jarāsandha was watching Him with restless eyes and was feeling very proud. Being thus puffed up with his conquest, he was repeatedly laughing. This is an example of aparasa.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
The laughter of Jarāsandha is certainly aparasa. If one of Jarāsandha’s followers, with demonic nature laughs at Kṛṣṇa or the event, it is also aparasa. If one of the devotees laughs at the event, it is pure hāsya-rasa.
[evam anye ’pi vijneyaas te ’dbhutaaparasaadayah |]
uttamās tu rasābhāsāḥ kaiścid rasatayoditāḥ ||40||
[uttamaas tu rasaabhaasaah kaishchid rasatayoditaah ||40||]
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
evam anye ’pi vijñeyās te ’dbhutāparasādayaḥ |
uttamās tu rasābhāsāḥ kaiścid rasatayoditāḥ ||40||
In a similar way, one should understand examples of aparasa for adbhūta and other rasas. Some persons consider superior rasābhāsa (uparasa) to be rasa, because it has a relishable nature.
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Durgama-saṅgamanī
Commentary
The meaning of the whole topic is presented in summary.
vibhāvādyā mitho yogyāḥ sampadyante rasāya te
vairasyāyānyathā sā tu yogyatā loka-viśrutā
The mutual combinations of vibhāva and other elements should produce rasa, without producing distaste. The ability of that combination to do so is acknowledged by all.
For instance, it is said: Some experts in rasa say that all bhāvas, even bhāvābhāsas and rasābhāsas are rasa since they are enjoyable.
Purport
Everything in connection with Kṛṣṇa is called ecstatic devotional love, although it may be exhibited in different ways: sometimes in right order and sometimes as a perverted reflection. According to the opinion of all expert devotees, anything that will arouse ecstatic love for Kṛṣṇa is to be taken as an impetus for transcendental mellow.
Thus ends the Bhaktivedanta summary study of Śrī Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu by Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī.
The four styles [Note: These are styles employed to convey different rasas. Kauśikī vṛtti is used to convey madhura-rasa; sātvatī is used to convey vīra, śānta, dāsya, vatsala, hāsya, and adbhuta-rasa; ārabhaṭī is used to convey vīra, raudra, karuṇa, bhayānaka and bībhatsa-rasa: and bharatī vṛtti is used to convey all rasas.] such as bharatī which indicate a condition of rasa in speech and drama have been explained in the work Nāṭaka-candrikā, since they are suitable only for dramas.
For fear of making the work too long, in this work I have gathered together in a summarized way the wealth of bhakti-rasa. May He with eternal form, who possesses the beauty of a cowherd boy’s form, and who spreads His bhāvas to Rāmacandra and other forms, be pleased with this northern section of the ocean of sweet rasa. May Sanātana Gosvāmī, who spread the mood of love expressed by Raghunātha dāsa Gosvāmī, and nourished the love of Gopāla Bhaṭṭa Gosvāmī, be pleased with the northern section of the ocean of sweet rasa. Thus ends the Ninth Wave, concerning rasābhāsa, in the Northern Section of the Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu. Here ends the Northern section. Here ends the Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu. rāmāṅga-śatru-gaṇite śāke gokulam adhiṣṭhitenāyam | bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhur viṭaṅkitaḥ kṣudra-rūpeṇa || Translation: This work called Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu was written in meager form, in the year 1436 Śāka while living in Gokula.
Purport
NoD Concluding Words
Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī concludes by saying that Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu is very difficult for ordinary men to understand, yet he hopes that Lord Kṛṣṇa, the eternal Supreme Personality of Godhead, will be pleased with his presentation of this book.
By rough calculation it is estimated that Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī finished Śrī Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu in Gokula Vṛndāvana in the year 1552. While physically present, Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī was living in different parts of Vṛndāvana, and his headquarters were in the temple of Rādhā-Dāmodara in the present city of Vṛndāvana. The place of Rūpa Gosvāmī’s bhajana, execution of devotional service, is commemorated still. There are two different tomblike structures in the Rādhā-Dāmodara temple; one structure is called his place of bhajana, and in the other his body is entombed. Behind this very tomb I have my place of bhajana, but since 1965 I have been away. The place, however, is being taken care of by my disciples. By Kṛṣṇa’s will, I am now residing at the Los Angeles temple of the International Society for Krishna Consciousness. This purport is finished today, the 30th of June, 1969.