Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī states that although Lord Kṛṣṇa is the reservoir of unlimited pleasure and the greatest leader of all, He is still dependent upon His devotees in three ways. According to the emotional status of the devotee, the Supreme Personality of Godhead is appreciated in three ways: as the most perfect, as very perfect and as perfect. When He exhibits Himself in fullness, He is appreciated by great learned scholars as most perfect. When He exhibits Himself in lesser degrees, He is called very perfect. And when He exhibits still less, He is called perfect. This means that Kṛṣṇa is appreciated for three degrees of perfection. These three degrees of perfection are especially exhibited as follows: when He is in Goloka Vṛndāvana His transcendental qualities are exhibited as most perfect, when He is in Dvārakā He exhibits His qualities as very perfect, and when He is in Mathurā He exhibits His qualities as perfect.
Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu · BRS 2.1.220 — Śrī Rūpa Gosvāmī
the sūtra behind this passage
nitya-guṇo vanamālī, yad api śikhāmaṇir aśeṣa-netṝṇām |
bhaktāpekṣikam asya, trividhatvaṁ likhyate tad api ||220||
Even though Kṛṣṇa is the topmost jewel among unlimited heroes endowed with eternal qualities, He is described as having three forms, which manifest according to the type of devotion in the devotee.
Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu · BRS 2.1.221 — Śrī Rūpa Gosvāmī
the sūtra behind this passage
hariḥ pūrṇatamaḥ pūrṇataraḥ pūrṇa iti tridhā |
śreṣṭha-madhyādibhiḥ śabdair nāṭye yaḥ paripaṭhyate ||221||
The Lord takes three forms: most perfect, more perfect and perfect. These are described in nāṭya-śāstra as best, medium and inferior.
Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu · BRS 2.1.222 — Śrī Rūpa Gosvāmī
the sūtra behind this passage
prakāśitākhila-guṇaḥ smṛtaḥ pūrṇatamo budhaiḥ |
asarva-vyañjakaḥ pūrṇataraḥ pūrṇo ’lpa-darśakaḥ ||222||
When Kṛṣṇa manifests all qualities, He is described by the intelligent as most perfect. Manifesting the qualities incompletely, He called more perfect, and manifesting even less qualities, He is called perfect.
Jīva Gosvāmī · Durgama-saṅgamanī
In comparison to the other two, He is called most perfect by manifesting all qualities (though Kṛṣṇa may not display all the qualities all the time), because of the correspondence between the greater intensity of bhakti in Kṛṣṇa’s devotees. In comparison to this, when Kṛṣṇa manifests Himself incompletely (asarva-vyañjakaḥ), and shows comparatively less qualities, He is called more perfect. In comparison to that, when He manifests even less of the qualities (alpa-darśakaḥ), He is called perfect.
Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu · BRS 2.1.223 — Śrī Rūpa Gosvāmī
the sūtra behind this passage
kṛṣṇasya pūrṇatamatā vyaktābhūd gokulāntare |
pūrṇatā pūrṇataratā dvārakā-mathurādiṣu ||223||
In Gokula, Kṛṣṇa appears as most perfect. In Dvārakā, Mathurā and other places, He appears as perfect and more perfect.
Jīva Gosvāmī · Durgama-saṅgamanī
The perfection in Gokula includes fullness in majesty as illustrated by the following:
tāvat sarve vatsa-pālāḥ paśyato ’jasya tat-kṣaṇāt
vyadṛśyanta ghana-śyāmāḥ pīta-kauśeya-vāsasaḥ
Then, while Lord Brahmā looked on, all the calves and the boys tending them immediately appeared to have complexions the color of bluish rain clouds and to be dressed in yellow silken garments. SB 10.13.46
The perfection of Kṛṣṇa in Gokula also includes fullness in sweetness:
nandaḥ kim akarod brahman śreya evaṁ mahodayam
yaśodā ca mahā-bhāgā papau yasyāḥ stanaṁ hariḥ
O learned brāhmaṇa, mother Yaśodā’s breast milk was sucked by the Supreme Personality of Godhead. What past auspicious activities did she and Nanda Mahārāja perform to achieve such perfection in ecstatic love? SB 10.8.46
Kṛṣṇa in Gokula also includes fullness of mercy:
aho bakī yaṁ stana-kāla-kūṭaṁ jighāṁsayāpāyayad apy asādhvī
lebhe gatiṁ dhātry-ucitāṁ tato ’nyaṁ kaṁ vā dayāluṁ śaraṇaṁ vrajema
Alas, how shall I take shelter of one more merciful than He who granted the position of mother to a she-demon [Pūtanā] although she was unfaithful and she prepared deadly poison to be sucked from her breast? SB 3.2.23
Manifestations in places other than Dvārakā and Mathurā (indicated by the word ādi) are not classified as more perfect or perfect in this statement, since no correlation of gradations have been given for these places. Rather the graduations of perfect and more perfect should be applied appropriately to other places (such as Avanti, Kurukṣetra, and Hastināpura) according to Kṛṣṇa’s particular display of mercy, powers and sweetness at these places.
Kṛṣṇa’s personality is analyzed as dhīrodātta, dhīra-lalita, dhīra-praśānta and dhīroddhata. If one asks how a personality can be beheld in four quite opposing ways, the answer is that the Lord is the reservoir of all transcendental qualities and activities. Therefore, His different aspects can be analyzed according to the exhibition of His limitless variety of pastimes, and as such there is no contradiction.
Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu · BRS 2.1.224 — Śrī Rūpa Gosvāmī
the sūtra behind this passage
sa punaś caturvidhaḥ syād dhīrodāttaś ca dhīra-lalitaś ca |
dhīra-praśānta-nāmā tathaiva dhīroddhataḥ kathitaḥ ||224||
Kṛṣṇa is also classed into four types: dhīrodātta, dhīra-lalita, dhīra-praśānta and dhīroddhata.
Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu · BRS 2.1.225 — Śrī Rūpa Gosvāmī
the sūtra behind this passage
bahuvidha-guṇa-kriyāṇām āspada-bhūtasya padmanābhasya |
tat-tal-līlā-bhedād virudhyate na hi catur-vidhāḥ ||225||
Classifying Kṛṣṇa into four different types is not a contradiction, because of respective differences in pastimes of the Lord, who is the abode of many types of qualities and activities.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura · Bhakti-sāra-pradarśinī
“If one is a dhīra-śānta he cannot be a dhīra-lalita.” Though this rule applies to other people, it does not apply to Kṛṣṇa. That is because at different times He displays these different types.
DHĪRODĀTTA
A dhīrodātta is a person who is naturally very grave, gentle, forgiving, merciful, determined, humble, highly qualified, chivalrous and physically attractive.
Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu · BRS 2.1.226 — Śrī Rūpa Gosvāmī
the sūtra behind this passage
tatra dhīrodāttaḥ (elevated) –
gambhīro vinayī kṣantā karuṇaḥ sudṛḍha-vrataḥ |
akatthano gūḍha-garvo dhīrodāttaḥ su-sattva-bhṛt ||226||
The person who is inscrutable, modest, tolerant, merciful, determined in vows, who obscures others’ pride, is not boastful, and is strong, is called dhīrodātta.
In this connection, the following statement given by Indra, the king of heaven, is very significant: “My dear Lord, I admit that I have committed great offenses unto You, but I cannot express my feelings of regret, being bewildered at seeing Your extraordinary chivalrous spirit, Your endeavor to protect Your devotees, Your determination, Your steadiness in lifting the great hill of Govardhana, Your beautiful bodily features and Your astonishing characteristic of being pleased simply by accepting the prayers of Your devotees and offenders.”
Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu · BRS 2.1.227 — Śrī Rūpa Gosvāmī
the sūtra behind this passage
yathā –
vīraṁ-manya-mada-prahāri-hasitaṁ dhaureyam ārtoddhṛtau
nirvyūḍha-vratam unnata-kṣiti-dharoddhāreṇa dhīrākṛtim |
mayy uccaiḥ kṛta-kilbiṣe ’pi madhuraṁ stutyā muhur yantritaṁ
prekṣya tvāṁ mama durvitarkya-hṛdayaṁ dhīr gīś ca na spandate ||227||
An example: Your smile steals the pride of those who think they are brave. You are eager to deliver those in suffering condition. You are true to Your promises. You are firm in holding up the high mountain. You have treated me kindly though I have committed offense. You are brought under control by verses of praise. Seeing You with such an inscrutable heart, my words and intelligence have become inactive.
Jīva Gosvāmī · Durgama-saṅgamanī
These are the words of Indra. “Stealing others’ pride by His smile” indicates His power to obscure others’ pride. “Being eager to deliver those in suffering” indicates His merciful nature. Nirvyūḍha-vrata means “determined in His vows” “Firmness in holding up the mountain” indicates His strength. “Being kind in spite of receiving offenses” indicates His tolerant attitude. “Being controlled by verses of praise” indicates His modesty and not being boastful. Durvitakrya-hṛdaya indicates His inscrutable nature.
The above statement by the king of heaven is an exact corroboration of Kṛṣṇa’s being dhīrodātta. Many learned scholars have agreed to also accept Lord Rāmacandra as dhīrodātta, but all of Lord Rāmacandra’s qualities are also included in the character of Lord Kṛṣṇa.
Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu · BRS 2.1.228 — Śrī Rūpa Gosvāmī
the sūtra behind this passage
gambhīratvādi-sāmānya-guṇā yad iha kīrtitāḥ |
tad eteṣu tad-ādhikya-pratipādana-hetave ||228||
All the qualities in the particular list mentioned in relation to Kṛṣṇa should be understood to manifest more prominently in these four types than other qualities, though the other qualities are also present.
Jīva Gosvāmī · Durgama-saṅgamanī
In the first three types, the qualities listed are those which are more prominent than other qualities present. They suppress the other qualities in order to manifest themselves clearly in those types.
Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu · BRS 2.1.229 — Śrī Rūpa Gosvāmī
the sūtra behind this passage
idaṁ hi dhīrodāttatvaṁ pūrvaiḥ proktaṁ raghūdvahe |
tat-tad-bhaktānusāreṇa tathā kṛṣṇe vilokyate ||229||
The previous authorities have described dhīrodātta qualities in Rāmacandra. These same qualities are also seen in Kṛṣṇa according to the type of love in His devotees.
DHĪRA-LALITA
A person is called dhīra-lalita if he is naturally very funny, always in full youthfulness, expert in joking and free from all anxieties. Such a dhīra-lalita personality is generally found to be domesticated and very submissive to his lover. This dhīra-lalita trait in the personality of Kṛṣṇa is described by Yajña-patnī, the wife of one of the brāhmaṇas who were performing sacrifices in Vṛndāvana. She tells her friends, “One day Śrīmatī Rādhārāṇī, accompanied by Her associates, was taking rest in Her garden, and at that time Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa arrived in that assembly. After sitting down, He began to narrate very impudently about His previous night’s pastimes with Rādhārāṇī. While He was speaking in that way, Rādhārāṇī became very embarrassed. She was feeling ashamed and was absorbed in thought, and Kṛṣṇa took the opportunity to mark Her breasts with different kinds of tilaka. Kṛṣṇa proved Himself to be very expert in that art.” In this way Kṛṣṇa, as dhīra-lalita, was enjoying His youthful proclivities in the company of the gopīs.
Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu · BRS 2.1.230 — Śrī Rūpa Gosvāmī
the sūtra behind this passage
dhīra-lalitaḥ (playful) –
vidagdho nava-tāruṇyaḥ parihāsa-viśāradaḥ |
niścinto dhīra-lalitaḥ syāt prāyaḥ preyasī-vaśaḥ ||230||
He is called dhīra-lalita who is clever, endowed with fresh youth (end of kaiśora period), skilful at joking and free of worries. He is controlled by His dear devotees.
Jīva Gosvāmī · Durgama-saṅgamanī
He is controlled by the devotees according to their endowment of excellent prema.
na pāraye ’haṁ niravadya-saṁyujāṁ
sva-sādhu-kṛtyaṁ vibudhāyuṣāpi vaḥ
yā mābhajan durjara-geha-śṛṅkhalāḥ
saṁvṛścya tad vaḥ pratiyātu sādhunā
I am not able to repay My debt for your spotless service, even within a lifetime of Brahmā. Your connection with Me is beyond reproach. You have worshiped Me, cutting off all domestic ties, which are difficult to break. Therefore, please let your own glorious deeds be your compensation. SB 10.32.22
anayārādhito nūnaṁ bhagavān harir īśvaraḥ
yan no vihāya govindaḥ prīto yām anayad rahaḥ
Certainly this particular gopī has perfectly worshiped the all-powerful Personality of Godhead, Govinda, since He was so pleased with her that He abandoned the rest of us and brought her to a secluded place. SB 10.30.28
Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu · BRS 2.1.231 — Śrī Rūpa Gosvāmī
the sūtra behind this passage
yathā–
vācā sūcita-śarvarī-rati-kalā-prāgalbhyayā rādhikāṁ
vrīḍā-kuñcita-locanāṁ viracayann agre sakhīnām asau |
tad-vakṣo-ruha-citra-keli-makarī-pāṇḍitya-pāraṁ gataḥ
kaiśoraṁ saphalī-karoti kalayan kuñje vihāraṁ hariḥ ||231||
An example: Kṛṣṇa made Rādhā lower her eyes in shame by boldly describing their pastimes of the previous night in front of her friends. Taking that opportunity, He displayed His skill by expertly drawing frolicking makaris on her breasts. In this way Kṛṣṇa sported in the groves and fulfilled His youthful years.
Jīva Gosvāmī · Durgama-saṅgamanī
This is a statement spoken to persons similar to the wives of the brāhmaṇas by a female messenger who participated in the intimate pastimes.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura · Bhakti-sāra-pradarśinī
“He fulfilled His youthful years” indicates that He had reached the end of His kaiśora age (nava-tāruṇya) and his carefree nature. Describing His pastimes of the previous night shows his skill at joking. Drawing on Rādhā’s breasts indicates his cleverness and being controlled by His lover.
Generally, those who are expert in writing drama choose to call Cupid the ideal dhīra-lalita, but we can more perfectly find in the personality of Kṛṣṇa all the characteristics of dhīra-lalita.
Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu · BRS 2.1.232 — Śrī Rūpa Gosvāmī
the sūtra behind this passage
govinde prakaṭaṁ dhīra-lalitatvaṁ pradarśyate |
udāharanti nāṭya-jñāḥ prāyo ’tra makara-dhvajam ||232||
The qualities of the dhīra-lalita are clearly revealed in Kṛṣṇa. But the dramatic scholars give the example of Cupid.
DHĪRA-PRAŚĀNTA
A person who is very peaceful, forbearing, considerate and obliging is called dhīra-praśānta. This dhīra-praśānta trait of Kṛṣṇa was exhibited in His dealings with the Pāṇḍavas. On account of the Pāṇḍavas’ faithful devotion to the Lord, He agreed to become their charioteer, their advisor, their friend, their messenger and sometimes their bodyguard. Such is an example of the result of devotional service toward Viṣṇu. When Kṛṣṇa was speaking to Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira about religious principles, He demonstrated Himself to be a great learned scholar, but because He accepted the position of younger cousin to Yudhiṣṭhira, He was speaking in a very gentle tone, which enhanced His beautiful bodily features. The movements of His eyes and the mode of His speech proved that He was very, very expert in giving moral instruction. Sometimes, Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira is also accepted by learned scholars as dhīra-praśānta.
Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu · BRS 2.1.233 — Śrī Rūpa Gosvāmī
the sūtra behind this passage
dhīra-śāntaḥ (gentle)
śama-prakṛtikaḥ kleśa-sahanaś ca vivecakaḥ |
vinayādi-guṇopeto dhīra-śānta udīryate ||233||
The learned say that He who is peaceful, tolerates suffering, uses discrimination, and possesses qualities like modesty is called dhīra-śānta.
Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu · BRS 2.1.234 — Śrī Rūpa Gosvāmī
the sūtra behind this passage
yathā –
vinaya-madhura-mūrtir manthara-snigdha-tāro
vacana-paṭima-bhaṅgī-sūcitāśeṣa-nītiḥ |
abhidadhad iha dharmaṁ dharma-putropakaṇṭhe
dvija-patir iva sākṣāt prekṣyate kaṁsa-vairī ||234||
An example: Speaking about dharma in front of Yudhiṣṭhira, Kṛṣṇa appears like the best of brāhmaṇas, pleasant with modesty. His eyes are moving steadily and are filled with love. He shows unlimited good qualities through His skilful speech.
Jīva Gosvāmī · Durgama-saṅgamanī
Vinaya-madhura-mūrtiḥ (with sweet modesty) indicates that He able to tolerate difficulties (a quality of the dhīra-śānta) by His modesty (another quality of the dhīra-śānta). Whatever He was instructed to do at that place, He would follow.
sārathya-pāraṣada-sevana-sakhya-dautya-
vīrāsanānugamana-stavana-praṇāmān
snigdheṣu pāṇḍuṣu jagat-praṇatiṁ ca viṣṇor
bhaktiṁ karoti nṛ-patiś caraṇāravinde
Mahārāja Parīkṣit heard that out of His causeless mercy Lord Kṛṣṇa [Viṣṇu], who is universally obeyed, rendered all kinds of service to the malleable sons of Pāṇḍu by accepting posts ranging from chariot driver to president to messenger, friend, night watchman, etc., according to the will of the Pāṇḍavas, obeying them like a servant and offering obeisances like one younger in years. When he heard this, Mahārāja Parīkṣit became overwhelmed with devotion to the lotus feet of the Lord. SB 1.16.16
The verse quoted is connected with the verb “hearing” in the previous verse. Vīrāsana (sitting as a warrior) means that He stayed awake at night with sword in His hand. Nṛpati (king) refers to Parīkṣit. An alternate version of the verse has dharma-putropakaṇṭham (in front of Yudhiṣṭhira).
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura · Bhakti-sāra-pradarśinī
Kṛṣṇa appeared just like the best of brāhmaṇas. He showed his modesty by acting as Arjuna’s charioteer, and following along with the Pāṇdavas, and serving them. This also indicates that He tolerated suffering. Manthara-snigdha-tāraḥ (His eyes moving steadily) indicates his peacefulness. Discussing dharma with Yudhiṣṭhira indicates His discrimination.
Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu · BRS 2.1.235 — Śrī Rūpa Gosvāmī
the sūtra behind this passage
yudhiṣṭhirādiko dhīrair dhīra-śāntaḥ prakīrtitaḥ ||235||
The learned glorify Yudhiṣṭhira and others as being dhīra-śanta.
DHĪRODDHATA
A person who is very envious, proud, easily angered, restless and complacent is called dhīroddhata by learned scholars. Such qualities were visible in the character of Lord Kṛṣṇa, because when He was writing a letter to Kālayavana, Kṛṣṇa addressed him as a sinful frog. In His letter Kṛṣṇa advised Kālayavana that he should immediately go and find some dark well for his residence because there was a black snake named Kṛṣṇa who was very eager to devour all such sinful frogs. Kṛṣṇa reminded Kālayavana that He could turn all the universes to ashes simply by looking at them.
Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu · BRS 2.1.236 — Śrī Rūpa Gosvāmī
the sūtra behind this passage
dhīroddhataḥ –
mātsaryavān ahaṅkārī māyāvī roṣaṇaś calaḥ |
vikatthanaś ca vidvadbhir dhīroddhata udāhṛtaḥ ||236||
The wise call dhīroddhata (haughty) the person who shows envy, pride, deceit, anger, fickleness, and boastful nature.
Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu · BRS 2.1.237 — Śrī Rūpa Gosvāmī
the sūtra behind this passage
yathā –
āḥ pāpin yavanendra dardura punar vyāghuṭya sadyas tvayā
vāsaḥ kutracid andha-kūpa-kuhara-kroḍe ’dya nirmīyatām |
helottānita-dṛṣṭi-mātra-bhasita-brahmāṇḍa-bhāṇḍaḥ puro
jāgarmi tvad-upagrahāya bhujagaḥ kṛṣṇo ’tra kṛṣṇābhidhaḥ ||237||
An example: O sinner! King of the Yavanas! O frog! Today, being foiled, make your residence in the corner of a dark hole. The black snake called Kṛṣṇa is waiting there alert to catch you. Just by glancing casually upwards, I have turned the vessel of the universe to ashes.
Jīva Gosvāmī · Durgama-saṅgamanī
This is from a letter written to Kālayavana. Vyāghuṭya means turning away. Kṛṣṇa’s threat to turn the universe to ashes is only speaking of some power of creating illusions, since such a thing did not happen.
The above statement by Kṛṣṇa seems apparently to be of an envious nature, but according to different pastimes, places and times this quality is accepted as a great characteristic. Kṛṣṇa’s dhīroddhata qualities have been accepted as great because Kṛṣṇa uses them only to protect His devotees. In other words, even undesirable traits may also be used in the exchange of devotional service.
Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu · BRS 2.1.239 — Śrī Rūpa Gosvāmī
the sūtra behind this passage
mātsaryādyāḥ pratīyante doṣatvena yad apy amī |
līlā-viśeṣa-śālitvān nirdoṣe ’tra guṇāḥ smṛtāḥ ||239||
Although qualities such as envy mentioned in verse 236 appear to be faults, they should be regarded as good qualities in Kṛṣṇa, because they are befitting certain pastimes.
Jīva Gosvāmī · Durgama-saṅgamanī
These qualities are suitable (śālitvāt) for certain pastimes such as punishing the wicked in order to protect the devotees.
Sometimes Bhīma, the second brother of the Pāṇḍavas, is also described as dhīroddhata.
Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu · BRS 2.1.238 — Śrī Rūpa Gosvāmī
the sūtra behind this passage
dhīroddhatas tu vidvadbhir bhīmasenādir ucyate ||238||
The learned call persons like Bhīma dhīroddhata.
Once, while fighting with a demon who was appearing as a deer, Kṛṣṇa challenged him in this way: “I have come before you as a great elephant named Kṛṣṇa. You must leave the battlefield, accepting defeat, or else there is death awaiting you.” This challenging spirit of Kṛṣṇa’s is not contradictory to His sublime character; because He is the Supreme Being, everything is possible in His character.
Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu · BRS 2.1.240 — Śrī Rūpa Gosvāmī
the sūtra behind this passage
yathā vā –
ambho-bhāra-bhara-praṇamra-jalada-bhrāntiṁ vitanvann asau
ghorāḍambara-ḍambaraḥ suvikuṭām utkṣipya hastārgalām |
durvāraḥ para-vāraṇaḥ svayam ahaṁ labdho ’smi kṛṣṇaḥ puro
re śrīdāma-kuraṅga saṅgara-bhuvo bhaṅgaṁ tvam aṅgīkuru ||240||
Another example: Making the low-hanging, water-filled clouds disperse, swinging a frightful trunk, with terrifying trumpeting sounds, I, the monstrous, irrepressible elephant called Kṛṣṇa, destroyer of opponents, have arrived! Flee from the battlefield, O deer called Śrīdāma!
Jīva Gosvāmī · Durgama-saṅgamanī
Fearing the disappearance of bhakti-rasa by the previous verse quoted, starting with āḥ pāpinaḥ, the author gives another example filled with mock derision directed to Śrīdāma. Ambho-bhāra-bhara-praṇamra-jalada is the correct version. Ambho-bhāra-naman-navīna-jalada (new clouds bowing down heavy with water) is an alternative version of the first phrase but not acceptable, since a tat-puruṣa compound such as ambho-bhāra-naman-jalada should not be formed with a present participle of a parasmaipada verb (naman). Viśva-Prakāśa says that aḍambara means the roaring of an elephant or a trumpet announcing a beginning. Ghorāḍambara-ḍambaraḥ means the loud sound of terrifying trumpeting.
Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu · BRS 2.1.241 — Śrī Rūpa Gosvāmī
the sūtra behind this passage
mitho virodhino ’py atra kecin nigaditā guṇāḥ |
harau niraṅkuśaiśvaryāt ko ’pi na syād asambhavaḥ ||241||
Some of the qualities listed above are contradictory to each other. Though contrary, their existence is not impossible in Kṛṣṇa, because of His unrestricted powers.
Jīva Gosvāmī · Durgama-saṅgamanī
This verse shows the wonderful nature of qualities in Kṛṣṇa, affirming even qualities such as envy in Him. Niraṅkuśaiśvaryāt (unrestricted powers) means “because of His ability to control everything and because He is the shelter of everything.”
There is a nice statement in the Kūrma Purāṇa about these contradictory traits of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. It is stated there that the Supreme Person is neither very fat nor very thin; He is always transcendental to material qualities, and yet His bodily luster is blackish. His eyes are reddish, He is all-powerful, and He is equipped with all different kinds of opulences. Contradictory traits in Kṛṣṇa’s person are not at all surprising; one should not consider the characteristics of Kṛṣṇa, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, to be actually contradictory. One should try to understand the traits of Kṛṣṇa from authorities and try to understand how these characteristics are employed by the supreme will of the Lord.
Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu · BRS 2.1.242 — Śrī Rūpa Gosvāmī
the sūtra behind this passage
atha ca kaurme –
asthūlaś cānaṇuś caiva sthūlo ’ṇuś caiva sarvataḥ |
avarṇaḥ sarvataḥ proktaḥ śyāmo raktānta-locanaḥ |
aiśvarya-yogād bhagavān viruddhārtho’bhidhīyate ||242||
This is illustrated in a statement from the Kūrma Purāṇa: The Lord is not gross, nor is He subtle. But He is both gross and subtle. He is without color, but is blackish with red at the edges of His eyes. By His power He possesses contrary qualities.
Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu · BRS 2.1.243 — Śrī Rūpa Gosvāmī
the sūtra behind this passage
tathāpi doṣāḥ parame naivāhāryāḥ kathañcana |
guṇā viruddhā apy ete samāhāryāḥ samantataḥ ||243||
One should never find any fault in the Lord. Though the qualities are contrary, He can resolve them all completely.
In the Mahā-varāha Purāṇa it is confirmed that the transcendental bodies of the Supreme Personality of Godhead and His expansions are all existing eternally. Such bodies are never material; they are completely spiritual and full of knowledge. They are reservoirs of all transcendental qualities. In the Viṣṇu-yāmala-tantra there is a statement that because the Personality of Godhead and His expanded bodies are always full of knowledge, bliss and eternity, they are always free from the eighteen kinds of material contaminations – illusion, fatigue, errors, roughness, material lust, restlessness, pride, envy, violence, disgrace, exhaustion, untruth, anger, hankering, dependence, desire to lord over the universe, seeing duality and cheating.
Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu · BRS 2.1.244 — Śrī Rūpa Gosvāmī
the sūtra behind this passage
mahāvārāhe ca–
sarve nityāḥ śāśvatāś ca dehās tasya parātmanaḥ |
hānopādāna-rahitā naiva prakṛtijāḥ kvacit ||244||
paramānanda-sandohā jñāna-mātrāś ca sarvataḥ |
sarve sarva-guṇaiḥ pūrṇāḥ sarva-doṣa-vivarjitāḥ ||245||
This is confirmed in the Mahā-varāha Purāṇa: All of the bodies of the Lord are eternal, and appear repeatedly in the material world. They are devoid of decrease and increase. They are never born of matter. All the bodies have the very nature of the highest bliss, are pure knowledge, are full of all good qualities, and are devoid of all faults.
Jīva Gosvāmī · Durgama-saṅgamanī
Śāśvatāḥ (eternal) here means that they continually appear in the material world. “Being endowed with all qualities” means that, as required, the forms manifest the qualities (not that all avatāras manifest all the qualities) Kṛṣṇa is the complete manifestation. This is understood from ete cāṁśa kalāḥ puṁsaḥ.
Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu · BRS 2.1.245 — Śrī Rūpa Gosvāmī
the sūtra behind this passage
mahāvārāhe ca–
sarve nityāḥ śāśvatāś ca dehās tasya parātmanaḥ |
hānopādāna-rahitā naiva prakṛtijāḥ kvacit ||244||
paramānanda-sandohā jñāna-mātrāś ca sarvataḥ |
sarve sarva-guṇaiḥ pūrṇāḥ sarva-doṣa-vivarjitāḥ ||245||
This is confirmed in the Mahā-varāha Purāṇa: All of the bodies of the Lord are eternal, and appear repeatedly in the material world. They are devoid of decrease and increase. They are never born of matter. All the bodies have the very nature of the highest bliss, are pure knowledge, are full of all good qualities, and are devoid of all faults.
Jīva Gosvāmī · Durgama-saṅgamanī
Śāśvatāḥ (eternal) here means that they continually appear in the material world. “Being endowed with all qualities” means that, as required, the forms manifest the qualities (not that all avatāras manifest all the qualities) Kṛṣṇa is the complete manifestation. This is understood from ete cāṁśa kalāḥ puṁsaḥ.
Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu · BRS 2.1.246 — Śrī Rūpa Gosvāmī
the sūtra behind this passage
vaiṣṇava-tantre ’pi –
aṣṭādaśa-mahā-doṣai rahitā bhagavat-tanuḥ |
sarvaiśvaryamayī satya-vijñānānanda-rūpiṇī ||246||
It is also confirmed in a Vaiṣṇava-tantra: The form of the Lord is without the eighteen great faults, is endowed with all powers and is the very essence (svarūpa) of existence, knowledge and bliss.
Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu · BRS 2.1.247 — Śrī Rūpa Gosvāmī
the sūtra behind this passage
aṣṭadaśa mahādoṣaḥ, yathā viṣṇu-yāmale –
mohas tandrā bhramo rukṣa-rasatā kāma ulbaṇaḥ |
lolatā mada-mātsarye hiṁsā kheda-pariśramau ||247||
asatyaṁ krodha ākāṅkṣā āśaṅkā viśva-vibhramaḥ |
viṣamatvaṁ parāpekṣā doṣā aṣṭādaśoditāḥ ||248||
The eighteen great faults are mentioned in the Viṣṇu-yāmala: The eighteen faults are bewilderment, sleep, error, material attachment without prema, material lust which brings suffering, fickleness, intoxication, envy, violence, exhaustion, toil, lying, anger, hankering, worry, absorption in worldly affairs, prejudice, and dependency on others.
Jīva Gosvāmī · Durgama-saṅgamanī
However, these same bad qualities are considered good qualities in Kṛṣṇa in relation to the devotees’ prema. Thus moha is illustrated as follows:
tato vatsān adṛṣṭvaitya puline ’pi ca vatsapān
ubhāv api vane kṛṣṇo vicikāya samantataḥ
Thereafter, when Kṛṣṇa was unable to find the calves, He returned to the bank of the river, but there He was also unable to see the cowherd boys. Thus He began to search for both the calves and the boys, as if He could not understand what had happened. SB 10.13.16
Sleep, exhaustion and toil (tandrā, kheda, pariśrama) are illustrated as follows:
kvacit pallava-talpeṣuniyuddha-śrama-karśitaḥ
vṛkṣa-mūlāśrayaḥ śetegopotsaṅgopabarhaṇaḥ
Sometimes Lord Kṛṣṇa grew tired from fighting and lay down at the base of a tree, resting upon a bed made of soft twigs and buds and using the lap of a cowherd friend as His pillow. SB 10.15.16
Error (bhrama) is illustrated as follows:
tāv aṅghri-yugmam anukṛṣya sarīsṛpantau
ghoṣa-praghoṣa-ruciraṁ vraja-kardameṣu
tan-nāda-hṛṣṭa-manasāv anusṛtya lokaṁ
mugdha-prabhītavad upeyatur anti mātroḥ
When Kṛṣṇa and Balarāma, with the strength of Their legs, crawled in the muddy places created in Vraja by cow dung and cow urine, Their crawling resembled the crawling of serpents, and the sound of Their ankle bells was very charming. Very much pleased by the sound of other people’s ankle bells, They used to follow these people as if going to Their mothers, but when They saw that these were other people, They became afraid and returned to Their real mothers, Yaśodā and Rohiṇī. SB 10.8.22
Attachment without prema (rukṣita-rasatā) however does not exist in the spiritual realm. Material lust which brings grief (ulbaṇa-kāma) also does not exist, because in Kṛṣṇa it takes the form of prema. Fickleness (lolatā) becomes a good quality:
vatsān muñcan kvacid asamaye krośa-sañjāta-hāsaḥ
steyaṁ svādv atty atha dadhi-payaḥ kalpitaiḥ steya-yogaiḥ
markān bhokṣyan vibhajati sa cen nātti bhāṇḍaṁ bhinnatti
dravyālābhe sagṛha-kupito yāty upakrośya tokān
Our dear friend Yaśodā, your son sometimes comes to our houses before the milking of the cows and releases the calves, and when the master of the house becomes angry, your son merely smiles. Sometimes He devises some process by which He steals palatable curd, butter and milk, which He then eats and drinks. When the monkeys assemble, He divides it with them, and when the monkeys have their bellies so full that they won’t take more, He breaks the pots. Sometimes, if He gets no opportunity to steal butter or milk from a house, He will be angry at the householders, and for His revenge He will agitate the small children by pinching them. Then, when the children begin crying, Kṛṣṇa will go away. SB 10.8.29
Intoxication (mada) is illustrated as follows:
mada-vighūrṇita-locana īṣat
māna-daḥ sva-suhṛdāṁ vana-mālī
badara-pāṇḍu-vadano mṛdu-gaṇḍaṁ
maṇḍayan kanaka-kuṇḍala-lakṣmyā
As Kṛṣṇa respectfully greets His well-wishing friends, His eyes roll slightly as if from intoxication. He wears a flower garland, and the beauty of His soft cheeks is accentuated by the brilliance of His golden earrings and the whiteness of His face, which has the color of a badara berry. SB 10.35.24
Envy (mātsarya) is illustrated as follows:
tatra pratividhiṁ samyag ātma-yogena sādhaye
lokeśa-mānināṁ mauḍhyād dhaniṣye śrī-madaṁ tamaḥ
By My mystic power I will completely counteract this disturbance caused by Indra. Demigods like Indra are proud of their opulence, and out of foolishness they falsely consider themselves the Lord of the universe. I will now destroy such ignorance. SB 10.25.16
There are many clear examples of violence (so they are not given). Lying is illustrated when Kṛṣṇa and the Pāṇḍavas disguised themselves in front of Jarāsandha, and in other pastimes:
nāhaṁ bhakṣitavān amba sarve mithyābhiśaṁsinaḥ
yadi satya-giras tarhi samakṣaṁ paśya me mukham
My dear mother, I have never eaten dirt. All My friends complaining against Me are liars. If you think they are being truthful, you can directly look into My mouth and examine it. SB 10.8.35
Examples of anger (krodha) are also well known. Hankering (ākāṅkṣā) illustrated as follows:
tāṁ stanya-kāma āsādya mathnantīṁ jananīṁ hariḥ
gṛhītvā dadhi-manthānaṁ nyaṣedhat prītim āvahan
While mother Yaśodā was churning butter, Lord Kṛṣṇa, desiring to drink the milk of her breast, appeared before her, and in order to increase her transcendental pleasure, He caught hold of the churning rod and began to prevent her from churning. SB 10.9.4
Worry (āsaṅkā) illustrated in the following:
kvāpy adṛṣṭvāntar-vipine vatsān pālāṁś ca viśva-vit
sarvaṁ vidhi-kṛtaṁ kṛṣṇaḥ sahasāvajagāma ha
When Kṛṣṇa was unable to find the calves and their caretakers, the cowherd boys, anywhere in the forest, He could suddenly understand that this was the work of Lord Brahmā. SB 10.13.17
Absorption in worldly affairs (viśva-vibhramaḥ) is shown in having the desire to maintain the universe, related to His devotees such as Brahmā. Prejudice (viṣamatvaṁ) is illustrated as follows:
samo ’haṁ sarva-bhūteṣu na me dveṣyo ’sti na priyaḥ
ye bhajanti tu māṁ bhaktyā mayi te teṣu cāpy aham
I envy no one, nor am I partial to anyone. I am equal to all. But whoever renders service unto Me in devotion is a friend, is in Me, and I am also a friend to him. BG 9.29
Dependency on others (parāpekṣā) is shown as follows:
ahaṁ bhakta-parādhīno hy asvatantra iva dvija
sādhubhir grasta-hṛdayo bhaktair bhakta-jana-priyaḥ
I am completely under the control of My devotees. Indeed, I am not at all independent. Because My devotees are completely devoid of material desires, I sit only within the cores of their hearts. What to speak of My devotee, even those who are devotees of My devotee are very dear to Me. SB 9.4.63
Therefore, it says in the Bhāgavatam:
kva śoka-mohau sneho vā bhayaṁ vā ye ’jña-sambhavāḥ
kva cākhaṇḍita-vijñāna-jñānaiśvaryas tv akhaṇḍitaḥ
How can lamentation, bewilderment, material affection or fear, all born out of ignorance, be ascribed to the infinite Supreme Lord, whose perception, knowledge and power are all similarly infinite? SB 10.77.31
Lamentation, bewilderment and material affection and fear when they originate from ignorance are definitely not present in the Lord. However, lamentation, bewilderment, material affection and fear when they originate from knowledge do exist in the Lord.
These qualities originating from knowledge, such as bewilderment arising from prema for the Lord, are also present in the devotees:
itthaṁ sma pṛṣṭaḥ sa tu bādarāyaṇis
tat-smāritānanta-hṛtākhilendriyaḥ
kṛcchrāt punar labdha-bahir-dṛśiḥ śanaiḥ
pratyāha taṁ bhāgavatottamottama
O Śaunaka, greatest of saints and devotees, when Mahārāja Parīkṣit inquired from Śukadeva Gosvāmī in this way, Śukadeva Gosvāmī, immediately remembering subject matters about Kṛṣṇa within the core of his heart, externally lost contact with the actions of his senses. Thereafter, with great difficulty, he revived his external sensory perception and began to speak to Mahārāja Parīkṣit about kṛṣṇa-kathā. SB 10.12.44
Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu · BRS 2.1.248 — Śrī Rūpa Gosvāmī
the sūtra behind this passage
aṣṭadaśa mahādoṣaḥ, yathā viṣṇu-yāmale –
mohas tandrā bhramo rukṣa-rasatā kāma ulbaṇaḥ |
lolatā mada-mātsarye hiṁsā kheda-pariśramau ||247||
asatyaṁ krodha ākāṅkṣā āśaṅkā viśva-vibhramaḥ |
viṣamatvaṁ parāpekṣā doṣā aṣṭādaśoditāḥ ||248||
The eighteen great faults are mentioned in the Viṣṇu-yāmala: The eighteen faults are bewilderment, sleep, error, material attachment without prema, material lust which brings suffering, fickleness, intoxication, envy, violence, exhaustion, toil, lying, anger, hankering, worry, absorption in worldly affairs, prejudice, and dependency on others.
Jīva Gosvāmī · Durgama-saṅgamanī
However, these same bad qualities are considered good qualities in Kṛṣṇa in relation to the devotees’ prema. Thus moha is illustrated as follows:
tato vatsān adṛṣṭvaitya puline ’pi ca vatsapān
ubhāv api vane kṛṣṇo vicikāya samantataḥ
Thereafter, when Kṛṣṇa was unable to find the calves, He returned to the bank of the river, but there He was also unable to see the cowherd boys. Thus He began to search for both the calves and the boys, as if He could not understand what had happened. SB 10.13.16
Sleep, exhaustion and toil (tandrā, kheda, pariśrama) are illustrated as follows:
kvacit pallava-talpeṣuniyuddha-śrama-karśitaḥ
vṛkṣa-mūlāśrayaḥ śetegopotsaṅgopabarhaṇaḥ
Sometimes Lord Kṛṣṇa grew tired from fighting and lay down at the base of a tree, resting upon a bed made of soft twigs and buds and using the lap of a cowherd friend as His pillow. SB 10.15.16
Error (bhrama) is illustrated as follows:
tāv aṅghri-yugmam anukṛṣya sarīsṛpantau
ghoṣa-praghoṣa-ruciraṁ vraja-kardameṣu
tan-nāda-hṛṣṭa-manasāv anusṛtya lokaṁ
mugdha-prabhītavad upeyatur anti mātroḥ
When Kṛṣṇa and Balarāma, with the strength of Their legs, crawled in the muddy places created in Vraja by cow dung and cow urine, Their crawling resembled the crawling of serpents, and the sound of Their ankle bells was very charming. Very much pleased by the sound of other people’s ankle bells, They used to follow these people as if going to Their mothers, but when They saw that these were other people, They became afraid and returned to Their real mothers, Yaśodā and Rohiṇī. SB 10.8.22
Attachment without prema (rukṣita-rasatā) however does not exist in the spiritual realm. Material lust which brings grief (ulbaṇa-kāma) also does not exist, because in Kṛṣṇa it takes the form of prema. Fickleness (lolatā) becomes a good quality:
vatsān muñcan kvacid asamaye krośa-sañjāta-hāsaḥ
steyaṁ svādv atty atha dadhi-payaḥ kalpitaiḥ steya-yogaiḥ
markān bhokṣyan vibhajati sa cen nātti bhāṇḍaṁ bhinnatti
dravyālābhe sagṛha-kupito yāty upakrośya tokān
Our dear friend Yaśodā, your son sometimes comes to our houses before the milking of the cows and releases the calves, and when the master of the house becomes angry, your son merely smiles. Sometimes He devises some process by which He steals palatable curd, butter and milk, which He then eats and drinks. When the monkeys assemble, He divides it with them, and when the monkeys have their bellies so full that they won’t take more, He breaks the pots. Sometimes, if He gets no opportunity to steal butter or milk from a house, He will be angry at the householders, and for His revenge He will agitate the small children by pinching them. Then, when the children begin crying, Kṛṣṇa will go away. SB 10.8.29
Intoxication (mada) is illustrated as follows:
mada-vighūrṇita-locana īṣat
māna-daḥ sva-suhṛdāṁ vana-mālī
badara-pāṇḍu-vadano mṛdu-gaṇḍaṁ
maṇḍayan kanaka-kuṇḍala-lakṣmyā
As Kṛṣṇa respectfully greets His well-wishing friends, His eyes roll slightly as if from intoxication. He wears a flower garland, and the beauty of His soft cheeks is accentuated by the brilliance of His golden earrings and the whiteness of His face, which has the color of a badara berry. SB 10.35.24
Envy (mātsarya) is illustrated as follows:
tatra pratividhiṁ samyag ātma-yogena sādhaye
lokeśa-mānināṁ mauḍhyād dhaniṣye śrī-madaṁ tamaḥ
By My mystic power I will completely counteract this disturbance caused by Indra. Demigods like Indra are proud of their opulence, and out of foolishness they falsely consider themselves the Lord of the universe. I will now destroy such ignorance. SB 10.25.16
There are many clear examples of violence (so they are not given). Lying is illustrated when Kṛṣṇa and the Pāṇḍavas disguised themselves in front of Jarāsandha, and in other pastimes:
nāhaṁ bhakṣitavān amba sarve mithyābhiśaṁsinaḥ
yadi satya-giras tarhi samakṣaṁ paśya me mukham
My dear mother, I have never eaten dirt. All My friends complaining against Me are liars. If you think they are being truthful, you can directly look into My mouth and examine it. SB 10.8.35
Examples of anger (krodha) are also well known. Hankering (ākāṅkṣā) illustrated as follows:
tāṁ stanya-kāma āsādya mathnantīṁ jananīṁ hariḥ
gṛhītvā dadhi-manthānaṁ nyaṣedhat prītim āvahan
While mother Yaśodā was churning butter, Lord Kṛṣṇa, desiring to drink the milk of her breast, appeared before her, and in order to increase her transcendental pleasure, He caught hold of the churning rod and began to prevent her from churning. SB 10.9.4
Worry (āsaṅkā) illustrated in the following:
kvāpy adṛṣṭvāntar-vipine vatsān pālāṁś ca viśva-vit
sarvaṁ vidhi-kṛtaṁ kṛṣṇaḥ sahasāvajagāma ha
When Kṛṣṇa was unable to find the calves and their caretakers, the cowherd boys, anywhere in the forest, He could suddenly understand that this was the work of Lord Brahmā. SB 10.13.17
Absorption in worldly affairs (viśva-vibhramaḥ) is shown in having the desire to maintain the universe, related to His devotees such as Brahmā. Prejudice (viṣamatvaṁ) is illustrated as follows:
samo ’haṁ sarva-bhūteṣu na me dveṣyo ’sti na priyaḥ
ye bhajanti tu māṁ bhaktyā mayi te teṣu cāpy aham
I envy no one, nor am I partial to anyone. I am equal to all. But whoever renders service unto Me in devotion is a friend, is in Me, and I am also a friend to him. BG 9.29
Dependency on others (parāpekṣā) is shown as follows:
ahaṁ bhakta-parādhīno hy asvatantra iva dvija
sādhubhir grasta-hṛdayo bhaktair bhakta-jana-priyaḥ
I am completely under the control of My devotees. Indeed, I am not at all independent. Because My devotees are completely devoid of material desires, I sit only within the cores of their hearts. What to speak of My devotee, even those who are devotees of My devotee are very dear to Me. SB 9.4.63
Therefore, it says in the Bhāgavatam:
kva śoka-mohau sneho vā bhayaṁ vā ye ’jña-sambhavāḥ
kva cākhaṇḍita-vijñāna-jñānaiśvaryas tv akhaṇḍitaḥ
How can lamentation, bewilderment, material affection or fear, all born out of ignorance, be ascribed to the infinite Supreme Lord, whose perception, knowledge and power are all similarly infinite? SB 10.77.31
Lamentation, bewilderment and material affection and fear when they originate from ignorance are definitely not present in the Lord. However, lamentation, bewilderment, material affection and fear when they originate from knowledge do exist in the Lord.
These qualities originating from knowledge, such as bewilderment arising from prema for the Lord, are also present in the devotees:
itthaṁ sma pṛṣṭaḥ sa tu bādarāyaṇis
tat-smāritānanta-hṛtākhilendriyaḥ
kṛcchrāt punar labdha-bahir-dṛśiḥ śanaiḥ
pratyāha taṁ bhāgavatottamottama
O Śaunaka, greatest of saints and devotees, when Mahārāja Parīkṣit inquired from Śukadeva Gosvāmī in this way, Śukadeva Gosvāmī, immediately remembering subject matters about Kṛṣṇa within the core of his heart, externally lost contact with the actions of his senses. Thereafter, with great difficulty, he revived his external sensory perception and began to speak to Mahārāja Parīkṣit about kṛṣṇa-kathā. SB 10.12.44
Regarding all of the above-mentioned statements, it is understood that the Mahā-viṣṇu is the source of all incarnations in the material world. But because of His greater, extraordinary opulence, we can understand that the son of Nanda Mahārāja is the source of the Mahā-viṣṇu also. This is confirmed in the Brahma-saṁhitā, wherein it is stated, “Let me offer my respectful obeisances unto Govinda, whose partial representation is the Mahā-viṣṇu.” The gigantic form of the Mahā-viṣṇu is the source of generation for innumerable universes. Innumerable universes are coming out of His exhaling breath, and the same universes are going back in with His inhaling breath. This Mahā-viṣṇu is also a plenary portion of a portion of Kṛṣṇa.
Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu · BRS 2.1.249 — Śrī Rūpa Gosvāmī
the sūtra behind this passage
itthaṁ sarvāvatārebhyas tato ’py atrāvatāriṇaḥ |
vrajendra-nandane suṣṭhu mādhurya-bhara īritaḥ ||249||
Thus, it has been explained that the amount of sweetness in Kṛṣṇa exceeds that of all of the avatāras and the source of avatāras, Mahā-viṣṇu.
Jīva Gosvāmī · Durgama-saṅgamanī
This verse, showing the most perfect position of Kṛṣṇa, summarizes the preceding description. According to the method explained in the previous section (ittham), being complete in sweetness, and also in powers, Kṛṣṇa is said to be superior even to Mahā-viṣṇu (avatārinaḥ), famous as the source of all the avatāras.
Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu · BRS 2.1.250 — Śrī Rūpa Gosvāmī
the sūtra behind this passage
tathā ca brahma-saṁhitāyām ādi-puruṣa-rahasye (5.59) –
asyaika-niśvasita-kālam athāvalambya
jīvanti loma-bilajā jagad-aṇḍa-nāthāḥ |
viṣṇur mahān sa iha yasya kalā-viśeṣo
govindam ādi-puruṣaṁ tam ahaṁ bhajāmi ||250||
This is explained in the Brahma-saṁhitā: Mahā-viṣṇu, into whom all the innumerable universes enter and from whom they come forth again simply by His breathing process, is a plenary expansion of Kṛṣṇa. Therefore, I worship Govinda, Kṛṣṇa, the cause of all causes.
Jīva Gosvāmī · Durgama-saṅgamanī
This verse explains how Kṛṣṇa is superior to Mahā-viṣṇu. Govinda mentioned in Brahma-saṁhitā is Vrajendra-nandana Kṛṣṇa, since the beginning verses describe Vṛndāvana Kṛṣṇa. From that, His sweetness can be understood. One should not consider that Govinda mentioned here is different from the son of Nanda. Gautamīya-tantra, explaining the eight and eighteen syllable Kṛṣṇa mantras, describes Govinda as follows:
aneka-janma-siddhānāṁ gopīnāṁ patir eva vā
nanda-nandana ity uktas trailokyānanda-vardhanaḥ
The master of gopīs who reached their perfection after many births is called the son of Nanda. He increases the bliss of the three worlds.
This is the meaning of Govinda after seeing many such statements. The sages have also said sakala-loka-maṅgalo nanda-gopa-tanayo devatā: The son of the cowherd Nanda is auspiciousness for the whole world. (Gautamīya-tantra)