← All temples

Varaha Lakshmi Narasimha Temple

Simhachalam, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India

VerifiedDocumented + legend

Also known as: Simhachalam Temple

Deities
Varaha Narasimha (Vishnu), Simhavalli Thayar (Lakshmi)
Traditions
vaishnava
Worship status
active
Coordinates
17.7664, 83.2505
Darshan hours
Varies by temple and season; consult the temple's own trust/management for the current daily schedule before visiting.
Best time to visit
October to February for cooler weather; Chandanotsavam on Akshaya Tritiya (April/May) is the one day of the year the sandalwood-covered idol's actual form is visible, and draws especially large crowds.
How to reach
On Simhachalam hill about 16 km from central Visakhapatnam, which has its own railway station and international airport; local buses and autos run directly to the hill.
Festivals
Chandanotsavam (Akshaya Tritiya) (April/May)

Location

Open in Google Maps

Simhachalam’s presiding deity is worshipped in a composite form found at few other temples: Varaha Narasimha, combining Vishnu’s boar avatar (Varaha, who slew the demon Hiranyaksha) with his man-lion avatar (Narasimha, who slew Hiranyaksha’s brother Hiranyakashipu). Temple tradition credits Hiranyakashipu’s own son, the devotee Prahlada, with building the very first shrine to this composite form on the hill after his father’s death — a legend rather than a documented event, since inscriptions found at the complex only go back to 1087 CE, well before any known written record of who actually raised that earliest structure.

The temple as it stands today is much better documented: it was built by the Eastern Ganga king Narasingha Deva I and formally consecrated by his son Bhanudeva I in 1268 CE, after which it received continued patronage across several centuries and dynasties, including the Cholas, the Reddy kings, the Gajapatis of Odisha, and the Tuluva rulers of the Vijayanagara Empire — a span of royal interest reflected in the nearly five hundred inscriptions recovered from the site, the latest dated as late as 1798 CE. The temple’s most distinctive living practice is the Chandanotsavam: for all but a single day each year, the main idol is kept entirely coated in sandalwood paste, and only on Akshaya Tritiya is that paste removed so pilgrims can view the deity’s actual form for about twelve hours before it is reapplied.

Sources

  • historical record: Cross-checked against Wikipedia's Varaha Lakshmi Narasimha Temple, Simhachalam article: confirms the present temple structure was built by Eastern Ganga dynasty king Narasingha Deva I and consecrated by his son Bhanudeva I in 1268 CE; later patronage from the Cholas, the Reddy dynasty, the Gajapatis, and the Vijayanagara Empire's Tuluva dynasty; nearly 500 inscriptions recovered from the temple complex, ranging in date from 1087 CE to 1798 CE; the temple's setting on Simhachalam hill (part of the Eastern Ghats, locally called 'Kailasa') near Visakhapatnam; and the annual Chandanotsavam on Akshaya Tritiya, when the sandalwood paste covering the idol is removed for about twelve hours. Coordinates (17.7664°N, 83.2505°E) confirmed via the Wikipedia article infobox.
  • oral tradition: The temple's own account of its origin — that Prahlada, after Vishnu slew his father Hiranyakashipu in the man-lion (Narasimha) form, built the very first shrine here for a composite Varaha-Narasimha deity — is devotional tradition, not a documented historical event. A separate tradition crediting the Vaishnava theologian Ramanuja with visiting and reconsecrating the temple in the 11th-12th century is treated by some historians as apocryphal rather than established fact.

For review

  • The earliest inscriptions at the site are dated to 1087 CE, roughly 180 years before Narasingha Deva I's 13th-century reconstruction (consecrated 1268 CE) — implying an earlier shrine stood on the hill, but Wikipedia does not identify who built that earlier structure; only the Prahlada legend fills that gap, and this entry does not present it as documented history. The tradition of a visit and reconsecration by the theologian Ramanuja is likewise noted as contested rather than confirmed.