← All temples

Grishneshwar Temple

Ellora (Verul), Maharashtra, India

Pending reviewDocumented + legend

Also known as: Ghrishneshwar Temple · Ghushmeshwar Jyotirlinga Temple

Deities
Grishneshwar (Shiva)
Traditions
shaiva
Worship status
active
Address
Verul village, near Ellora Caves, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar (Aurangabad) district, Maharashtra, India
Coordinates
20.024972, 75.169917
Darshan hours
Varies by temple and season; consult the temple's own trust/management for the current daily schedule before visiting.
Best time to visit
October to March for cooler weather; easily combined with a visit to the neighboring Ellora Caves. Maha Shivaratri is the principal festival.
How to reach
In Verul village, about 1.5 km from the Ellora Caves and 30 km from Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar (Aurangabad), which has its own airport and railway station.
Festivals
Maha Shivaratri (February/March)

Location

Open in Google Maps

Grishneshwar (also spelled Ghrishneshwar, and sometimes called Ghushmeshwar), the westernmost and traditionally last-listed of the twelve Jyotirlingas, stands in Verul village barely 1.5 km from the Ellora Caves in Maharashtra — a separate, still-active Shiva shrine, distinct from the famous 8th-century rock-cut Kailasa Temple monument at Ellora covered elsewhere in this directory. Shaiva legend traces its origin to a devoted woman named Ghushma, who is said to have fashioned and immersed a hundred and one Shiva lingas each day; when her stepson was killed out of jealousy and then miraculously restored to life from a sacred pond, Shiva appeared and, at her request, agreed to remain at the site forever as the Ghushmeshwar/Grishneshwar Jyotirlinga.

The temple’s documented history is one of repeated destruction and rebuilding: an earlier structure was destroyed under the Delhi Sultanate in the 13th-14th centuries and suffered further damage during the long Mughal-Maratha conflict. Restoration began in the 16th century under Maloji Bhosale, grandfather of the Maratha king Shivaji, and the black-stone, Hemadpanthi-style temple seen today was rebuilt to its present form in 1729 with Holkar-family patronage, after Mughal power in the Deccan had waned. Exactly which Holkar queen funded this 1729 rebuilding is not fully settled in the sources checked for this entry — Wikipedia’s own article text and its category tagging point to two different names — so that detail is flagged here rather than stated with false certainty.

Sources

  • scripture: Shiva Purana — Grishneshwar (Ghushmeshwar) named among the twelve Jyotirlingas; the Ghushma legend is recounted in the Shiva Purana tradition.
  • historical record: Cross-checked against Wikipedia's account of Grishneshwar Temple: confirms destruction of an earlier structure under the Delhi Sultanate in the 13th-14th centuries and further rebuilding/re-destruction during Mughal-Maratha conflict, a 16th-century restoration begun by Maloji Bhosale (Shivaji's grandfather), and reconstruction to the present form in 1729 under Holkar patronage after the Mughal Empire's decline; confirms the black-stone, Hemadpanthi-style structure and its location roughly 1.5 km from the Ellora Caves, distinct from the separate, non-Jyotirlinga Kailasa rock-cut temple monument at Ellora.
  • oral tradition: The Puranic story of the devotee Ghushma, who fashioned 101 lingas daily and whose murdered stepson was miraculously revived from a sacred pond, after which Shiva manifested here as the Jyotirlinga at her request, is devotional legend rather than documented history.

For review

  • Sources disagree on which Holkar patron sponsored the 1729 reconstruction: the Wikipedia article's own prose names 'Gautama Bai Holkar of Indore', while the same article's category metadata (and much popular tradition, by analogy with her documented sponsorship of Kashi Vishwanath and other temple rebuilding) instead credits Ahilyabai Holkar. Ahilyabai Holkar (b. 1725, regent from 1767) would have been only about four years old in 1729, which is chronologically inconsistent with the 'Gautama Bai Holkar' attribution as well as with a popular Ahilyabai attribution; this entry flags the discrepancy rather than asserting either name with confidence.