FolioCorpusŚrī Īśopaniṣad

Śrī Īśopaniṣad — 5

तदेजति तन्नैजति तद्दूरे तद्वन्तिके । तदन्तरस्य सर्वस्य तदु सर्वस्यास्य बाह्यतः ॥ ५ ॥
tad ejati tan naijati
[tad ejati tan naijati]
tad dūre tad v antike
[tad doore tad v antike]
tad antar asya sarvasya
[tad antar asya sarvasya]
tad u sarvasyāsya bāhyataḥ
[tad u sarvasyaasya baahyatah]
tat — this Supreme Lord ejati — walks tat — He na — not ejati — walks tat — He dūre — far away tat — He u — also antike — very near tat — He antaḥ — within asya — of this sarvasya — of all tat — He u — also sarvasya — of all asya — of this bāhyataḥ — external to .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tad ejati tan naijati
tat
this Supreme Lord
ejati
walks
tat
He
na
not
ejati
walks
tad dūre tad v antike
tat
He
dūre
far away
tat
He
u
also
antike
very near
tad antar asya sarvasya
tat
He
antaḥ
within
asya
of this
sarvasya
of all
tad u sarvasyāsya bāhyataḥ
tat
He
u
also
sarvasya
of all
asya
of this
bāhyataḥ
external to .
The Supreme Lord walks and does not walk. He is far away, but He is very near as well. He is within everything, and yet He is outside of everything.

Here is a description of some of the Supreme Lord’s transcendental activities, executed by His inconceivable potencies. The contradictions given here prove the inconceivable potencies of the Lord. “He walks, and He does not walk.” Ordinarily, if someone can walk, it is illogical to say he cannot walk. But in reference to God, such a contradiction simply serves to indicate His inconceivable power. With our limited fund of knowledge we cannot accommodate such contradictions, and therefore we conceive of the Lord in terms of our limited powers of understanding. For example, the impersonalist philosophers of the Māyāvāda school accept only the Lord’s impersonal activities and reject His personal feature. But the members of the Bhāgavata school, adopting the perfect conception of the Lord, accept His inconceivable potencies and thus understand that He is both personal and impersonal. The bhāgavatas know that without inconceivable potencies there can be no meaning to the words “Supreme Lord.” We should not take it for granted that because we cannot see God with our eyes the Lord has no personal existence. Śrī Īśopaniṣad refutes this argument by declaring that the Lord is far away but very near also. The abode of the Lord is beyond the material sky, and we have no means to measure even this material sky. If the material sky extends so far, then what to speak of the spiritual sky, which is altogether beyond it? That the spiritual sky is situated far, far away from the material universe is confirmed in the Bhagavad-gītā (15.6) . But despite the Lord’s being so far away, He can at once, within less than a second, descend before us with a speed swifter than that of the mind or wind. He can also run so swiftly that no one can surpass Him. This has already been described in the previous mantra. Yet when the Personality of Godhead comes before us, we neglect Him. Such foolish negligence is condemned by the Lord in the Bhagavad-gītā (9.11) , where He says that the foolish deride Him, considering Him a mortal being. He is not a mortal being, nor does He come before us with a body produced of material nature. There are many so-called scholars who contend that the Lord descends in a body made of matter, just like an ordinary living being. Not knowing His inconceivable power, such foolish men place the Lord on an equal level with ordinary men. Because He is full of inconceivable potencies, God can accept our service through any sort of medium, and He can convert His different potencies according to His own will. Nonbelievers argue either that the Lord cannot incarnate Himself at all, or that if He does He descends in a form of material energy. These arguments are nullified if we accept the existence of the Lord’s inconceivable potencies. Then we will understand that even if the Lord appears before us in the form of material energy, it is quite possible for Him to convert this energy into spiritual energy. Since the source of the energies is one and the same, the energies can be utilized according to the will of their source. For example, the Lord can appear in the form of the arcā-vigraha, a Deity supposedly made of earth, stone or wood. Deity forms, although engraved from wood, stone or other matter, are not idols, as the iconoclasts contend. In our present state of imperfect material existence, we cannot see the Supreme Lord due to imperfect vision. Yet those devotees who want to see Him by means of material vision are favored by the Lord, who appears in a so-called material form to accept His devotees’ service. One should not think that such devotees, who are in the lowest stage of devotional service, are worshiping an idol. They are factually worshiping the Lord, who has agreed to appear before them in an approachable way. Nor is the arcā form fashioned according to the whims of the worshiper. This form is eternally existent with all paraphernalia. This can be actually felt by a sincere devotee, but not by an atheist. In the Bhagavad-gītā (4.11) the Lord says that how He treats His devotee depends on the devotee’s degree of surrender. The Lord reserves the right not to reveal Himself to anyone and everyone but to show Himself only to those souls who surrender unto Him. Thus for the surrendered soul He is always within reach, whereas for the unsurrendered soul He is far, far away and cannot be approached. In this connection, two words the revealed scriptures often apply to the Lord – saguṇa (“with qualities”) and nirguṇa (“without qualities”) – are very important. The word saguṇa does not imply that when the Lord appears with perceivable qualities He must take on a material form and be subject to the laws of material nature. For Him there is no difference between the material and spiritual energies, because He is the source of all energies. As the controller of all energies, He cannot at any time be under their influence, as we are. The material energy works according to His direction; therefore He can use that energy for His purposes without ever being influenced by any of the qualities of that energy. (In this sense He is nirguṇa, “without qualities.”) Nor does the Lord become a formless entity at any time, for ultimately He is the eternal form, the primeval Lord. His impersonal aspect, or Brahman effulgence, is but the glow of His personal rays, just as the sun’s rays are the glow of the sun-god. When the child saint Prahlāda Mahārāja was in the presence of his atheist father, his father asked him, “Where is your God?” When Prahlāda replied that God resides everywhere, the father angrily asked whether his God was within one of the pillars of the palace, and the child said yes. At once the atheist king shattered the pillar in front of him to pieces, and the Lord instantly appeared as Nṛsiṁha, the half-man, half-lion incarnation, and killed the atheist king. Thus the Lord is within everything, and He creates everything by His different energies. Through His inconceivable powers He can appear at any place in order to favor His sincere devotee. Lord Nṛsiṁha appeared from within the pillar not by the order of the atheist king but by the wish of His devotee Prahlāda. An atheist cannot order the Lord to appear, but the Lord will appear anywhere and everywhere to show mercy to His devotee. The Bhagavad-gītā (4.8) similarly states that the Lord appears in order to vanquish nonbelievers and protect believers. Of course, the Lord has sufficient energies and agents who can vanquish atheists, but it pleases Him to personally favor a devotee. Therefore He descends as an incarnation. Actually, He descends only to favor His devotees and not for any other purpose. In the Brahma-saṁhitā (5.35) it is said that Govinda, the primeval Lord, enters everything by His plenary portion. He enters the universe as well as all the atoms of the universe. He is outside in His virāṭ form, and He is within everything as antaryāmī. As antaryāmī He witnesses everything that is going on, and He awards us the results of our actions as karma-phala. We ourselves may forget what we have done in previous lives, but because the Lord witnesses our actions, the results of our actions are always there, and we have to undergo the reactions nonetheless. The fact is that there is nothing but God within and without. Everything is a manifestation of His different energies, like the heat and light emanating from a fire, and in this way there is a oneness among His diverse energies. Although there is oneness, however, the Lord in His personal form still enjoys unlimitedly all the pleasures enjoyed minutely by the tiny part-and-parcel living entities.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Śrīla Bhaktivinoda Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Vedārka-dīdhiti
Commentary

tad ejati tan naijati tad dūre tad v antike

tad antar asya sarvasya tad u sarvasyāsya bāhyataḥ

Vedārka Dīdhiti Commentary

tad ejati tat ātma-tattvaṁ ejati chalati. tan-naijati ejati tad-dūre varttate. tad vantike varttate. tat antarasya sarvasya. tadu tat asya viśvasya sarvasya bāhyataḥ tiṣṭhati.

(“The ātmā-tattva [Paramātmā] is both moving and non-moving. He is both far and near, present within the universe and outside of it.”)

PURPORT

Just as material objects have jaḍa-śakti (material potency) inherent within them, so also transcendental objects have their own potency known as ātma-śakti. By this energy, all contradictory natures found in connection to matter find harmony in ātmā-tattva (transcendental reality). Animate and inanimate is naturally contradictory, near and far has contradictory natures, internal and external are contradictory – these cannot exist simultaneously in relation to mundane objects, yet it is possible that they can be harmonised due to the acintya–śakti (inconceivable potency) of the Paramātmā.

Madhvācārya Classical
Commentary

Sanskrit text, Unicode transliteration, Word-for-word and English translation of Īśa-upaniṣad mantra 5:

तदेजति तन्नैजति तद्दूरे तद्वन्तिके ।

तदन्तरस्य सर्वस्य तदु सर्वस्यास्य बाह्यतः ॥ ५ ॥ tadejati tannaijati taddūre tadvantike |

tadantarasya sarvasya tadu sarvasyāsya bāhyataḥ || 5 ||

tat—from Him (the word ‘tad’ is an indeclinable here=tasmāt); ejati—trembles in awe; tat—He Himself; na—not; ejati—trembles, fears; tat—He; Because all-pervading—He is; dūre—far off; tadu—so also; antike—near; tat—He; antar—within; asya—of this; sarvasya—of all; tat u sarvasyaḥ—that verily of all; asya—of this; bāhyataḥ—outside.

5. All tremble from fear of Him, but He is afraid of none (and since He is All-pervading) He is far off as well as near, He is without as well as within.

Commentary: The Bhāṣya of Madhva (Madhvācārya):

(English translation of Madhva’s 13th-century commentary called the Īśāvāsyopaniṣadbhāṣya or Īśopaniṣadbhāṣya)

The words ‘tad ejat’ mean that “the others tremble from fear of Him.” But He Himself is afraid of none and so does not tremble. As we find in the Tattva Saṃhitā:—“All even are afraid of Him, but Hari is afraid of no one. As He is all-pervading, He is said to be far off as well as near: to be outside of all as well as inside of all.”

Note.—The words “tad ejat” do not mean either that Brahman is agitated or active Himself; or that He is afraid. In fack the word ‘tad’ is an indeclinable here, and means ‘from him’ or ‘on account of Him.’ The indeclinable has the force of the ablative case. The word ‘anyat,’ “others” is understood here and is the agent to the verb ejat. This verse cannot be consistently explained on the theory that Brahman is actionless.

Article published on 22 November, 2020

Last Updated: 22 November, 2020

📝 My note

← Back to Śrī Īśopaniṣad