Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu .2.47
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
There is a passage in the Hayaśīrṣa Pañcarātra which states, “My dear Lord, O Supreme Personality of Godhead, I do not want any resultant benediction from my religious life, nor do I want any economic development, nor do I want to enjoy sense gratification, nor liberation. I simply pray to be an eternal servant at Your lotus feet. Kindly oblige me and give me this benediction.” In the same Hayaśīrṣa Pañcarātra, after Nṛsiṁhadeva wanted to give benedictions to Prahlāda Mahārāja, Prahlāda did not accept any material benediction and simply asked the favor of the Lord to remain His eternal devotee.
The less immediate object of action, Viṣṇu, becomes the subject of yācitaḥ, instead of mukti, as in the case of verbs starting with duh. [Note: Some verbs such as duh (to milk) and pracch (to request) can take two objects. Viṣṇuṁ na yācate varān: He does not ask Viṣṇu for a boon. In the passive, for yāc, the secondary object “Viṣṇu” becomes the subject. (Pāṇini 1.4.51) Verbs of similar meaning such as vṛ (to ask for) also can take two objects and should follow the same rule. However, in this case, the principal object bhakti becomes the subject, counter to the rule.] On the other hand, in the second line, bhakti, the main object of action becomes the subject of vṛtāḥ for emphasis. This is poetic license (to emphasize Viṣṇu and bhakti and denigrate mukti).
My note
Source: vedabase.io